Chinese practice
一知半解
having limited understanding of a matter
照片：維基共享資源
(yi1 zhi1 ban4 jie3)
英國科學家及哲學家弗朗西斯‧培根（西元一五六一～一六二六年），是提倡經驗主義作為獲得知識之方法的先鋒，他主張以嚴格的科學方法來質疑我們對世界的了解。
培根在他一六○一年的文章〈論無神論〉中寫道：「一點點的哲學，會讓人的思想傾向於無神論；但深入鑽研哲學，便會把人的心智帶向宗教。」
當然，培根寫作此文的時代背景，普遍仍是宗教掛帥的。
這句話的宗教內容是否為真，並非此處的焦點，對我們而言重要的是培根此言之含義──學習得不完整反而會造成誤導，讓人自以為知道的比實際所知還多，因此我們對事物必須先有全面的認識，才能夠對其作出適切的評論。
在一六九八年集結出版，名為《The Mystery of Phanaticism》（盲信之謎）的一批匿名信中提到了培根的概念，並闡述了這個想法：
「培根大人知道得很清楚，一點點的知識容易讓人自我膨脹、變得輕率，但更多的知識會將他們拉回正軌，並讓他們對自我有謙卑的認識。」
這也就是說，少量的知識會讓人對一己所學驕傲自滿，變得自我迷戀，除非他們後來有更全面的理解，否則他們不會對其所知所學做合理的評估。
十年之後，英國詩人亞歷山大‧波普（一六八八～一七四四年）在他一七○九年的作品〈論批評〉中，把這概念寫成了詩句：
膚淺之學乃危殆之事;
窮經深探，始能一嚐皮埃里亞百靈甘泉。
淺沾使人徒入迷津；
飽學深思終可戒懵增慧。
希臘神話中，有雙翅膀的飛馬珀伽索斯是海神波塞頓的孩子，馬蹄所踏之地，就會冒出泉水，稱作「皮埃里亞泉」，傳說飲此泉水的人，都會得到靈感與知識。
波普的詩句即為英文諺語「a little learning is a dangerous thing」（有一點點的知識是件危險的事）的出處。在一七七四年版的《Gentleman and Lady’s Complete Magazine》中，一篇文章引用這句話時出了錯，變成：「誠然，波普先生說，『A little knowledge is a dangerous thing』」。
波普的原句「a little learning」和錯引的「a little knowledge」這兩種版本今皆通行，用來指人有了一些知識就以為自己是專家，從而犯下錯誤。
「A little knowledge is a dangerous thing」若翻譯成中文，可譯為「一知半解是危險的」，或是「淺學誤人」。「一知半解」是個成語，其用法大約可歸成兩類，一為單純形容人對事物的了解有限、不夠深入；另一為推衍至語境中的隱含意，意指對事物只有皮毛的知識而妄加行動，可能造成禍害與危險。
成語「一知半解」，一般認為出自宋代著名理學家張栻（西元一一三三～一一八○年）的〈寄周子充尚書〉。這篇文章有一部分談到他即知即行、知行合一的理學觀，他說：
「蓋致知力行，此兩者工夫互相發也」（「致知」與「力行」兩者是相輔相成的），又說：「若學者以想象臆度，或一知半解為知道，而日知之則無不能行，是妄而已」（但若為學時未求真知，光憑主觀揣度，或不求甚解，又以其為所知並據之而行，那麼所得的一切將會是虛妄不實的）。
有趣的是，無論是「A little knowledge is a dangerous thing」或「一知半解」，經驗主義或格物致知(探求事物的道理，求得真理)，雖然產生於東西方不同時空、有著不同名稱，但都是源於哲學上知識論的探索。
(台北時報林俐凱譯)
很多人在一知半解之下簽約，承受極大風險，事後常導致許多糾紛。
(Many people sign contracts without fully understanding the implications, and get themselves in a lot of trouble as a result. This often leads to all kinds of conflict.)
抱歉，我對這個議題一知半解，所以不方便多作評論。
(Sorry, I don’t really know too much about this issue, so I don’t feel comfortable discussing it.)
英文練習
a little knowledge is a dangerous thing
The English scientist Francis Bacon (1561 - 1626) was an early advocate of empiricism as an approach to knowledge, and of the adoption of a rigorous scientific method for questioning what we believe we know about the world.
In his 1601 essay Of Atheism, Bacon writes: “A little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion.”
Bacon was writing, of course, at a time when the prevailing outlook was still strongly religious.
The veracity of the religious message is not the subject at hand, however: The important thing for us here is Bacon’s implication that incomplete learning can mislead one into thinking one knows more than one does, and that one must attain a comprehensive understanding of a subject before it is safe to comment on it.
This idea was elaborated in a set of anonymous letters published in 1698 under the name The Mystery of Phanaticism, in a reference to Bacon’s concept:
“Twas well observed by my Lord Bacon, that a little knowledge is apt to puff up, and make men giddy, but a greater share of it will set them right, and bring them to low and humble thoughts of themselves.”
That is, a little knowledge will make people proud of their learning, and they will become enamored of themselves, and will not return to a more reasonable assessment of their knowledge until they understand the subject more fully.
A decade later, in his 1709 work An Essay on Criticism, the English poet Alexander Pope (1688 - 1744) wrote:
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
and drinking largely sobers us again.
According to Greek mythology, the winged horse Pegasus, child of the god Poseidon, would cause a spring to emerge wherever he struck the ground with his hoof. One such spring was the Pierian spring, thought to bring inspiration and knowledge to everyone who drank from it.
From Pope’s verse we get the English proverb “a little learning is a dangerous thing.” Pope would be misquoted in an article published in a 1774 edition of Gentleman and Lady’s Complete Magazine, in which the writer says, “Mr. Pope says, very truly, ‘A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.’” Both versions — Pope’s “a little learning” and the misquote “a little knowledge” — are both used today to mean that a bit of knowledge can make a person believe they are more expert than they actually are, and that this can lead to mistakes being made.
In Chinese, the proverb can be translated as either 一知半解是危險的 (incomplete understanding is dangerous) or 淺學誤人 (shallow knowledge misleads). The phrase 一知半解 is, in itself, a Chinese idiom that can be used in two different ways: The first is simply to describe someone whose knowledge is limited, and not deep enough; the second contains the implication that somebody with only superficial knowledge taking action can lead to disaster or danger.
The idiom 一知半解 is generally acknowledged as originating in a letter the Song Dynasty Neo-Confucian rationalist scholar Zhang Shi (1133 - 1180) sent to Zhou Zichong, a government minister. In this letter, Zhang talks of the rationalist concept of the dialectical relationship between knowledge and action. He wrote, 蓋致知力行，此兩者工夫互相發也 (knowledge and action are equally imperative: the one bolsters the other), and 若學者以想象臆度，或一知半解為知道，而日知之則無不能行，是妄而已 (if the scholar, in studying, neglects to strive for the truth, and only relies on subjective assumption, or does not try to fully understand, acting according to what he knows, then it will all be in vain.)
It is interesting to note that both phrases — “a little knowledge is a dangerous thing” and “一知半解,” derive from a similar epistemology, despite being called different names and emerging in different places and at different times: Empirical inquiry in the West, and the Neo-Confucian striving for the truth and reason in China.
(Paul Cooper, Taipei Times)
He thinks he knows everything, but he doesn’t. He will cause problems if he implements that policy. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
(他自以為無所不知，其實並非如此。如果他把這個政策付諸實行，問題會層出不窮。一知半解是很危險的。)
I’m not sure you understand the complexity of this situation. Be careful how you proceed: A little learning is a dangerous thing.
(不知道你了不了解這情況的複雜性。淺學誤人，你得要小心你的做法。)
When it comes to movies, some people delight in watching spine-chilling horror films. Surprisingly, apart from containing a few scares, horror movies may also offer an unexpected __1__. According to a study, watching 90 minutes of a scary movie can burn an average of 113 calories, which is roughly __2__ to taking a 30-minute walk. Researchers from the University of Westminster carried out an experiment in which they __3__ participants’ oxygen intake, carbon dioxide output, and heart rates while they were watching horror movies without any distractions. The results revealed that physiological responses to fear play a crucial role
Bilingual Story is a fictionalized account. 雙語故事部分內容純屬虛構。 Echo pulled out a worn and tattered shoe box under father’s large oak desk. “Mariko, what should we do with these family photos?” Mariko stared at the old box with a slightly hurt expression, and then blankly at the photos. “Throw them in the garbage pile. . . along with that old, ratty box,” she murmured. She resented that her father had not cared enough to find a nicer home for the family photos. “Father never really cared about me anyway.” Echo’s emotion sensor detected sorrow. ”Mariko, that is
In the vast landscapes of Australia, a unique and charming creature roams — the “wombat.” These round, adorable animals possess surprising abilities and fascinating traits that never fail to amaze. Let’s explore the world of this remarkable creature. Wombats are marsupials native to Australia, measuring around one meter in length and weighing between 20 and 35kg. Their fur varies in color, ranging from brown to gray to black. As herbivores, they primarily feed on grass, bark and roots. To adapt to Australia’s weather conditions, wombats have developed a slow metabolism and a leisurely pace. However, despite their bulky appearance,
Dos & Don’ts — 想想看，這句話英語該怎麼說？ 1. 你覺得這部電影怎樣？ ˇ What do you think of the movie? χ How do you like the movie? χ How do you think of the movie? 註︰What do you think of ＝ What is your opinion of。 think 的受詞是 what，不能用 how。 2. 你認為哪一個歌星唱得最好？ ˇ Which singer do you think is the best? χ Do you think which singer is the best? 註︰英語中 which singer 似乎是 do you think 的受詞，實則 do you think 是插入語，其他例子如下： 你以為他喜歡誰？ Who do you think he likes? 你以為我住在哪裏？ Where do you think I live? 你想我昨天在公園裏碰到了誰？ Whom/Who do you think I met in the park yesterday? 3. 他不論到什麼地方，總是帶著一把雨傘。 ˇ No matter where he goes, he
RSS