Beijing’s insistence that its so-called “one China principle” is a prerequisite for Taiwan’s participation in APEC activities is a serious violation of the organization’s norms and practices, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday.
The ministry reiterated that Taiwan, as an official member of APEC, shares equal participation rights with other member economies.
The APEC grouping is one of the few international bodies Taiwan is a member of, although it takes part as “Chinese Taipei” to avoid political problems and its president never attends.
Photo: Reuters
Next year’s summit is scheduled to take place in Shenzhen, China, in November.
On Saturday, MOFA official Jonathan Sun (孫儉元) said in South Korea at the end of this year’s summit that China had provided written assurances last year about the safety of all participants at next year’s summit.
In a written statement to Reuters, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said there were no worries.
“As the host of APEC in 2026, China will fulfil its host-country obligations in accordance with APEC rules and customary practice, and there will be no issue with all parties participating smoothly,” it said.
“We would like to emphasize that the key to Chinese Taipei’s participation in APEC activities lies in compliance with the ‘one China’ principle and the relevant APEC memorandum of understanding, rather than any safety issues,” it said.
Speaking in Taipei on Monday after returning from South Korea, Sun said Taiwan had already asked China last year whether it would receive “equal treatment” and expressed concerns about its people’s safety.
Other “like-minded partners” had similar worries, he added.
“We hope everyone can urge the Chinese side to fulfil their promises to ensure to safety of all the participants and equal participation of the economies, not only Taiwan,” he said.
“At the joint request of our country and like-minded nations, China explicitly guaranteed in writing last year that it would ensure the personal safety of all economic participants and facilitate their smooth entry and exit to attend meetings in China,” MOFA said in a statement yesterday.
The joint statement from the bilateral ministerial meetings last year and this year clearly included the statement that “all economies should have equal participation in all APEC meetings, including the leaders’ meetings,” it said.
Taiwan “sternly demands that the Chinese side must honor its commitments and, in accordance with APEC rules and practices, ensure Taiwan’s equal, dignified and safe participation in all APEC meetings and activities held in China next year,” MOFA said.
“It must safeguard the personal safety of our delegates,” it added. “We will not accept any political maneuver aimed at diminishing or excluding Taiwan’s participation, and we will resolutely counter such actions in cooperation with like-minded partners.”
The last time China hosted an APEC summit, in 2014, relations with Taiwan were much better under then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who signed landmark trade and tourism deals with Beijing.
However, in 2001, Taiwan boycotted the APEC summit in China after a disagreement over who it could send.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu said the strengthening of military facilities would help to maintain security in the Taiwan Strait Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi, visiting a military base close to Taiwan, said plans to deploy missiles to the post would move forward as tensions smolder between Tokyo and Beijing. “The deployment can help lower the chance of an armed attack on our country,” Koizumi told reporters on Sunday as he wrapped up his first trip to the base on the southern Japanese island of Yonaguni. “The view that it will heighten regional tensions is not accurate.” Former Japanese minister of defense Gen Nakatani in January said that Tokyo wanted to base Type 03 Chu-SAM missiles on Yonaguni, but little progress
NO CHANGES: A Japanese spokesperson said that Tokyo remains consistent and open for dialogue, while Beijing has canceled diplomatic engagements A Japanese official blasted China’s claims that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has altered Japan’s position on a Taiwan crisis as “entirely baseless,” calling for more dialogue to stop ties between Asia’s top economies from spiraling. China vowed to take resolute self-defense against Japan if it “dared to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait” in a letter delivered Friday to the UN. “I’m aware of this letter,” said Maki Kobayashi, a senior Japanese government spokeswoman. “The claim our country has altered its position is entirely baseless,” she said on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg on Saturday. The Chinese Ministry