China yesterday countered US President Donald Trump’s across-the-board tariffs on Chinese products with tariffs on select US imports, as well as announcing an antitrust investigation into Google and other trade measures.
US tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico were also set to go into effect yesterday before Trump agreed to a 30-day pause, as the two countries acted to appease his concerns about border security and drug trafficking.
Trump planned to talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the next few days.
Photo: EPA-EFE
China said it would implement a 15 percent tariff on coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG) products, as well as a 10 percent tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery and large-engine vehicles imported from the US. The tariffs are to take effect on Monday next week.
“The US’ unilateral tariff increase seriously violates the rules of the World Trade Organization,” the Chinese State Council Tariff Commission said in a statement. “It is not only unhelpful in solving its own problems, but also damages normal economic and trade cooperation between China and the US.”
The impact on US exports might be limited. Although the US is the biggest exporter of LNG, it does not export much to China. In 2023, the US exported 4,906 million cubic meters of LNG to China, or about 2.3 percent of total natural gas exports, US Energy Information Administration data showed.
China imported only about 700,000 vehicles overall last year, mainly from Europe and Japan, said Bill Russo, the founder of the Automobility Ltd consultancy in Shanghai.
China also announced export controls on several elements critical to the production of modern high-tech products. They include tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum and indium, many of which are designated as critical minerals by the US Geological Survey, meaning they are essential to US economic or national security that have supply chains vulnerable to disruption. The export controls are in addition to ones China placed in December on key elements such as gallium.
In addition, the Chinese State Administration for Market Regulation yesterday said it is investigating Google on suspicion of breaching antitrust laws. The announcement did not mention the tariffs, but came just minutes after Trump’s 10 percent tariffs on China were to take effect.
It was unclear how the probe would affect Google’s operations.
The company has long faced complaints from Chinese smartphone makers over its business practices surrounding the Android operating system, said John Gong, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing.
Otherwise, Google has a limited presence in China, and its search engine is blocked in the country like most other Western platforms. Google did not immediately comment.
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce also placed two US companies on an unreliable entities list: PVH Group, which owns Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, and Illumina, which is a biotechnology company with offices in China.
The listing could bar them from engaging in China-related import or export activities and from making new investments in the country.
Beijing began investigating PVH Group in September last year over “improper Xinjiang-related behavior” after the company allegedly boycotted the use of Xinjiang cotton.
CROSS-STRAIT COLLABORATION: The new KMT chairwoman expressed interest in meeting the Chinese president from the start, but she’ll have to pay to get in Beijing allegedly agreed to let Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) around the Lunar New Year holiday next year on three conditions, including that the KMT block Taiwan’s arms purchases, a source said yesterday. Cheng has expressed interest in meeting Xi since she won the KMT’s chairmanship election in October. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a consensus on a meeting was allegedly reached after two KMT vice chairmen visited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in China last month. Beijing allegedly gave the KMT three conditions it had to
‘BALANCE OF POWER’: Hegseth said that the US did not want to ‘strangle’ China, but to ensure that none of Washington’s allies would be vulnerable to military aggression Washington has no intention of changing the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Saturday, adding that one of the US military’s main priorities is to deter China “through strength, not through confrontation.” Speaking at the annual Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, Hegseth outlined the US Department of Defense’s priorities under US President Donald Trump. “First, defending the US homeland and our hemisphere. Second, deterring China through strength, not confrontation. Third, increased burden sharing for us, allies and partners. And fourth, supercharging the US defense industrial base,” he said. US-China relations under
The Chien Feng IV (勁蜂, Mighty Hornet) loitering munition is on track to enter flight tests next month in connection with potential adoption by Taiwanese and US armed forces, a government source said yesterday. The kamikaze drone, which boasts a range of 1,000km, debuted at the Taipei Aerospace and Defense Technology Exhibition in September, the official said on condition of anonymity. The Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology and US-based Kratos Defense jointly developed the platform by leveraging the engine and airframe of the latter’s MQM-178 Firejet target drone, they said. The uncrewed aerial vehicle is designed to utilize an artificial intelligence computer
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus yesterday decided to shelve proposed legislation that would give elected officials full control over their stipends, saying it would wait for a consensus to be reached before acting. KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) last week proposed amendments to the Organic Act of the Legislative Yuan (立法院組織法) and the Regulations on Allowances for Elected Representatives and Subsidies for Village Chiefs (地方民意代表費用支給及村里長事務補助費補助條例), which would give legislators and councilors the freedom to use their allowances without providing invoices for reimbursement. The proposal immediately drew criticism, amid reports that several legislators face possible charges of embezzling fees intended to pay