Plans to pass a legislative motion clarifying Taiwan’s stance on UN Resolution 2758 might be derailed as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demurs on the issue, saying it could adversely affect cross-strait relations.
The Democratic Progressive Party, which is planning to draft a motion to address UN Resolution 2758, is hoping to gain the support of other parties, but the KMT caucus yesterday said that such a motion needs further evaluation.
China has aligned UN Resolution 2758 with its own definition of the “one China principle,” reducing Taiwan’s opportunity for participation on the world stage.
Photo: AP
However, the resolution has recently captured the attention of the international community, with the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, the Australian Senate and the Dutch House of Representatives successively passing motions in support of Taiwan and seeking to clarify that the resolution does not involve Taiwan nor is it the same as China’s interpretation.
UN Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative” of China, but it does not state that it has sovereignty over Taiwan, as Beijing has insisted.
The KMT caucus yesterday said that the DPP’s proposed motion “needs to be evaluated pragmatically.”
Rather than hastily passing such a motion, it is necessary to determine how it could potentially affect the development of cross-strait relations, including if it could raise tensions between the two sides, KMT caucus secretary-general Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) said.
Every member of the legislature loves their country and hopes to see Taiwan engage with the international community, but it is necessary to first pragmatically manage cross-strait relations, he said.
Cross-strait relations take precedence over other diplomatic ties, and only by handling them well would Taiwan have more space to participate on the world stage, he added.
Lin urged the DPP to carefully consider whether such a motion would contribute toward peaceful relations with China, rather than only helping Taiwan.
He also expressed gratitude on behalf of his party for the support from other countries.
The KMT’s response drew sharp criticism from the DPP.
“With a party like that, who needs enemies? The KMT should apologize to Taiwanese society,” DPP caucus deputy secretary-general Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) said.
DPP caucus secretary-general Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) accused the KMT caucus of backtracking on its earlier support for the proposed motion, citing Lin’s comments when the Australian Senate passed its motion last month.
“The KMT is under pressure from whom?” she asked, in an apparent reference to China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) last week urging countries to stop supporting Taiwan and reaffirming its own interpretation linking UN Resolution 2758 and its “one China principle.”
Wu asked whether the KMT caucus had been influenced by China’s comments, and questioned whether the party is fit to partake in governing the country.
Lin’s lack of support is disappointing, DPP Legislator Tsai Yi-yu (蔡易餘) said.
While the world supports Taiwan in its hopes of clarifying UN Resolution 2758, the KMT reversed its position as soon as the TAO commented on the issue, he said, adding that the KMT preferred to follow the TAO’s lead.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
RSS