The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday traded barbs over DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) proposed “Taiwan consensus,” with the DPP saying it would provide a strong foundation for cross-strait talks, while the KMT dismissed the idea as “mere rhetoric.”
Tsai, the DPP’s presidential candidate, during the first leg of her current US visit on Wednesday, renewed her commitment to seek a consensus among Taiwanese through a democratic process, which would be used as the basis for negotiations with China.
Accusing the KMT administration of fabricating the so-called “1992 consensus,” which she said was too fragile to serve as a foundation for China and Taiwan to build a long-term relationship, Tsai said that after a “Taiwan consensus” was formed via a democratic mechanism, a legal foundation could be built via legislation.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), seeking re-election, yesterday challenged Tsai to define the meaning of “Taiwan consensus.”
“We should at least know what it is before discussing the possibility of legalization. So far, no one knows the context of [Taiwan consensus], and I am afraid that we need to wait for an explanation before we know whether it can be legislated,” Ma said.
King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), executive director of Ma’s re-election campaign office, joined Ma in criticizing Tsai’s cross-strait platform, challenging Tsai to elaborate on how such a consensus could be formulated through a democratic process.
King, currently in the US to seek support for Ma from US-based Taiwanese voters, described Tsai’s idea of a “Taiwan consensus” as “mere rhetoric,” and said that on cross-strait relations, the public consensus is to maintain the ‘status quo,’ which is Ma’s “three-noes policy: no unification, no independence and no use of force.”
“Tsai and the DPP has been obsessed with the ‘1992 consensus’ issue, and ignored our achievements in cross-strait developments over the past years. Tsai’s ‘Taiwan consensus’ lacks solid content and political implications. It’s nothing but slogan-like rhetoric,” King said.
In response, Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全), the DPP’s vice presidential candidate and secretary-general, yesterday said in Taipei that transparency, democratic procedure and stability were the most important factors in the “Taiwan consensus,” which aims to facilitate a virtuous cycle for cross-strait engagement, so that cross-strait relations would be stable and consistent regardless of which political party wins the election.
A “Taiwan consensus” means that any change in Taiwan’s status should be determined by the people of Taiwan through a democratic procedure, Tsai campaign spokesperson Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) said.
“Ma is not qualified to be the head of state of a democracy when he tries to strip Taiwanese of their rights to determine their own future in favor of one-party rule,” Hsu said.
Hsu said that various public opinion polls showed that more than 70 percent of Taiwanese agree that “Taiwan is the Republic of China (ROC) and the ROC is Taiwan” and that Taiwan is a sovereign country and that they opposed engaging with China under the “one China” principle. Only slightly more than 10 percent of people agree with Ma’s argument of “one China equals the ROC,” she said.
Additional reporting by CNA
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) plans to make advanced 3-nanometer chips in Japan, stepping up its semiconductor manufacturing roadmap in the country in a triumph for Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s technology ambitions. TSMC is to adopt cutting-edge technology for its second wafer fab in Kumamoto, company chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said yesterday. That is an upgrade from an original blueprint to produce 7-nanometer chips by late next year, people familiar with the matter said. TSMC began mass production at its first plant in Japan’s Kumamoto in late 2024. Its second fab, which is still under construction, was originally focused on
DETERRENCE EFFORTS: Washington and partners hope demonstrations of force would convince Beijing that military action against Taiwan would carry high costs The US is considering using HMAS Stirling in Western Australia as a forward base to strengthen its naval posture in a potential conflict with China, particularly over Taiwan, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday. As part of its Indo-Pacific strategy, Washington plans to deploy up to four nuclear-powered submarines at Stirling starting in 2027, providing a base near potential hot spots such as Taiwan and the South China Sea. The move also aims to enhance military integration with Pacific allies under the Australia-UK-US trilateral security partnership, the report said. Currently, US submarines operate from Guam, but the island could
EMERGING FIELDS: The Chinese president said that the two countries would explore cooperation in green technology, the digital economy and artificial intelligence Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday called for an “equal and orderly multipolar world” in the face of “unilateral bullying,” in an apparent jab at the US. Xi was speaking during talks in Beijing with Uruguayan President Yamandu Orsi, the first South American leader to visit China since US special forces captured then-Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro last month — an operation that Beijing condemned as a violation of sovereignty. Orsi follows a slew of leaders to have visited China seeking to boost ties with the world’s second-largest economy to hedge against US President Donald Trump’s increasingly unpredictable administration. “The international situation is fraught
Opposition parties not passing defense funding harms Taiwan’s national security, two US senators said separately in rare public criticism. “I am disappointed to see Taiwan’s opposition parties in parliament [the legislature] slash President [William] Lai’s (賴清德) defense budget so dramatically,” Roger Wicker, a Republican who chairs the US Senate Armed Forces Committee, said on social media. “The original proposal funded urgently needed weapons systems. Taiwan’s parliament should reconsider — especially with rising Chinese threats,” he added. Wicker’s post linked to an article published by Bloomberg that said that the two opposition parties’ move was “potentially jeopardizing the purchases of billions of dollars of
RSS