Former diplomat and trade expert Benjamin Lu (魯肇忠) is calling on the Ma administration to clearly explain and reveal all details of a proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China before developing the pact any further with Beijing.
“People in Taiwan are very much concerned about an ECFA, but strangely the government is keeping them in the dark,” he said during an interview in Washington, where he is currently visiting family.
“It is very unusual,” Lu added. “They are not releasing details of their talks with Beijing. They are keeping things secret and that is making people [feel it is] very dubious.”
A specialist in international trade policy, Lu served as deputy director of the Bureau of Foreign Trade in the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and in the late 1980s and early 1990s he was one of Taiwan’s top diplomats, serving as representative in the UK, the US and in Belgium.
“I certainly don’t believe that the proposed ECFA will provide any opportunity for Taiwan to increase its exports to the PRC [People’s Republic of China],” he said. “The reason is that what we can manufacture in Taiwan can be manufactured in mainland China at a much cheaper price. We have no competitive edge at all, even with the concession of a tariff provided by ECFA, if there is any. There is a slight chance for Taiwan to export more tropical fruit to mainland China and some semi-finished products.”
Lu spoke out in the aftermath of a statement from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) office dismissing criticism from former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and retired US diplomat John Tkacik, who both said they believed an ECFA would undermine Taiwan’s competitiveness.
The statement said that Tkacik had been “misleading” and offered to “explain” the trade pact to Lee, hinting that he had failed to understand it.
Lu, on the other hand, said that he agreed with Tkacik and Lee, and that both men deserved to be treated with respect and have their concerns properly answered.
“As a result of [an] ECFA, a lot of other products, including agricultural products, will be sold from mainland China to Taiwan and that will definitely hurt the domestic economy,” Lu said.
“I am also skeptical that the proposed pact will pave the way to other free-trade agreements. I believe that a certain kind of political maneuver will be exercised to put up obstacles to the enforcement of the pact,” he added.
The only positive point that Lu could see to an ECFA was the protection it might provide to Taiwanese investment in China, but to what extent that protection would be implemented remained to be seen.
“It’s easy talking, but doing is something else,” he said.
Lu added that he “totally agreed” with Tkacik that an ECFA would marginalize the Taiwanese economy.
“I think Ma’s government is pretty stubborn,” he said. “They don’t care about the concerns of the people. We need to have all of the details of the talks. They must not continue to keep them secret.”
Also See: Beijing’s intentions for ECFA very clear
MISINFORMATION: The generated content tends to adopt China’s official stance, such as ‘Taiwan is currently governed by the Chinese central government,’ the NSB said Five China-developed artificial intelligence (AI) language models exhibit cybersecurity risks and content biases, an inspection conducted by the National Security Bureau (NSB) showed. The five AI tools are: DeepSeek, Doubao (豆包), Yiyan (文心一言), Tongyi (通義千問) and Yuanbao (騰訊元寶), the bureau said, advising people to remain vigilant to protect personal data privacy and corporate business secrets. The NSB said it, in accordance with the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法), has reviewed international cybersecurity reports and intelligence, and coordinated with the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau and the National Police Agency’s Criminal Investigation Bureau to conduct an inspection of China-made AI language
BOOST IN CONFIDENCE: The sale sends a clear message of support for Taiwan and dispels rumors that US President Donald Trump ‘sold out’ the nation, an expert said The US government on Thursday announced a possible sale to Taiwan of fighter jet parts, which was estimated to cost about US$330 million, in a move that an expert said “sends a clear message of support for Taiwan” amid fears that Washington might be wavering in its attitude toward Taipei. It was the first announcement of an arms sale to Taiwan since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House earlier this year. The proposed package includes non-standard components, spare and repair parts, consumables and accessories, as well repair and return support for the F-16, C-130 and Indigenous Defense Fighter aircraft,
CHECKING BOUNDARIES: China wants to disrupt solidarity among democracies and test their red lines, but it is instead pushing nations to become more united, an expert said The US Department of State on Friday expressed deep concern over a Chinese public security agency’s investigation into Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for “secession.” “China’s actions threaten free speech and erode norms that have underpinned the cross-strait ‘status quo’ for decades,” a US Department of State spokesperson said. The Chongqing Municipal Public Security Bureau late last month listed Shen as “wanted” and launched an investigation into alleged “secession-related” criminal activities, including his founding of the Kuma Academy, a civil defense organization that prepares people for an invasion by China. The spokesperson said that the US was “deeply concerned” about the bureau investigating Shen
DISPUTE: A Chinese official prompted a formal protest from Tokyo by saying that ‘the dirty head that sticks itself out must be cut off,’ after Takaichi’s Taiwan remarks Four armed China Coast Guard vessels yesterday morning sailed through disputed waters controlled by Japan, amid a diplomatic spat following Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments on Taiwan. The four ships sailed around the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) to Taiwan, and which Taiwan and China also claim — on Saturday before entering Japanese waters yesterday and left, the Japan Coast Guard said. The China Coast Guard said in a statement that it carried out a “rights enforcement patrol” through the waters and that it was a lawful operation. As of the end of last month,
RSS