Pressure mounted on Israel yesterday as Australia became the latest country seeking answers over the use of Western passports in the Dubai killing of a top Hamas militant by suspected Mossad agents.
Australia summoned the Israeli ambassador to discuss the latest development in the investigation into the killing, which Dubai’s police chief has said was most likely carried out by agents of the Israeli intelligence service.
Australia “will not be silent on the matter,” Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said after three Australian passport-holders were named among 15 new suspects linked to last month’s Cold War-style killing of Mahmud al-Mabbouh.
“If Australian passports are being used or forged by any state, let alone for the purpose of assassination, this is of the deepest concern and we are getting to the bottom of this now,” Rudd told public broadcaster ABC. “We will not leave a single stone unturned.”
A statement on Monday from Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said there was no evidence to link Israel to the killing of Mabbouh, who was found dead at a luxury Dubai hotel on Jan. 20.
The country’s envoys, however, have already been called in over the affair by four European countries — Britain, France, Germany and Ireland — because of the use of such passports seemingly issued by these countries.
In many cases, the documents appeared either to have been faked or obtained illegally.
Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith, who summoned Israeli Ambassador Yuval Rotem for an explanation yesterday, said initial investigations showed the Australian passports were probably “duplicated or altered.”
They had not yet reached any conclusions, Smith said.
“But I made it crystal clear to the ambassador that if the results of that investigation cause us to come to the conclusion that the abuse of Australian passports was in any way sponsored or condoned by Israeli officials, then Australia would not regard that as the act of a friend,” Smith said.
The other 15 new suspects being sought are six British, three French and three Irish passport-holders, Dubai investigators said in a statement.
Wednesday’s announcement by Dubai police brought the total number of people being sought to 26. All had used Western passports.
In addition to the Western suspects, three Palestinians are being questioned over the killing, Al-Ittihad newspaper reported yesterday, citing a police source.
Dubai police have previously announced that they have in custody two Palestinians, who were deported from Jordan.
“The source confirmed that one of those [previously detained] Palestinians has been proven to have been involved in Mabbouh’s killing,” Al-Ittihad said.
The scale of the operation as detailed by Dubai police has raised eyebrows in Israel.
“It is hard to believe that, if Mossad ... carried out the operation, the planners were so irresponsible as to dispatch nearly 30 agents and to expose an entire select operational unit on one assassination operation,” said Yossi Melman, security correspondent for Israel’s Haaretz newspaper. “Either the new revelations are another salvo in Dubai’s psychological warfare or the police investigators are groping in the dark.”
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive