Whether you love or loathe generative AI chatbots, they’re becoming increasingly involved in the business of romance.
There’s understandable skepticism about the technology’s place in dating. Still, a growing number of people are turning to AI as a de facto dating coach or relationship expert. Some use the technology to get guidance on creating a dating app profile, decode messages from potential partners and draft replies or seek general dating advice.
But those inquiries can have varying degrees of success. Understanding how to best harness a chatbot’s power and acknowledging its limitations can help.
Illustration: Peter Hamlin, AP
Here are some tips from experts.
WINGMAN, NOT GHOSTWRITER
Logan Ury, the director of relationship science at the dating app Hinge, said she understands people’s hesitance about AI but however we search for love, “what we’re searching for stays the same.” Hinge has AI-powered conversation starters and feedback tools to help build users’ profiles and make interactions smooth.
Ury said AI should be like your wingman rather than your ghostwriter because “when you show up on that date, it’s very important that who your match meets is the person who they’ve been talking to online.”
Getting feedback on a dating app profile and asking for first date ideas based on the interests of your match are good uses of the technology in Ury’s opinion. She does not advise copying and pasting messages written by a chatbot or using generative AI to alter or create images of yourself.
Some believe AI should have an even more limited role, like dating coach Erika Ettin. Tasks like proofreading your dating profile or messages are as far as she advises going with a chatbot. Ettin urges those looking for love to strive for authenticity, not perfection.
“All I ask is for people to put their own thought and critical thinking in first, and then if they’re going to use AI to check something, it’s after they have already formulated an opinion,” Ettin said.
ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS
Many users are providing chatbots with “way too little and then expecting it to read their minds,” said Jules White, the director of Vanderbilt University’s initiative on the future of learning and generative AI.
The quality of the advice can vary significantly based on how you prompt the chatbot. Vague questions will likely yield a generic response. Specificity and question structure can get you a much more tailored result. But prompting isn’t about wordsmithing, contrary to some definitions, White said. It’s about learning how to “yield this computational thought effectively to solve problems.”
One technique White suggests is instructing your chatbot to ask questions of you. Users can input a prompt like, “Here’s what I’m trying to do. I want you to ask me questions one at a time until you have enough information to do that thing,” White said.
This way, the chatbot can adapt and change its next question based on users’ responses.
Prompts that help you think deeply about the situation are best, said Matt Shumer, a general partner at investment firm Shumer Capital and a prominent voice in the AI industry. Shumer advises people to tell their chatbots not to give them the answer, but “help me get there on my own.” In dating, an example would be presenting the chatbot with messages from a potential match you’re struggling to interpret and asking it to help you think about the situation like a dating coach would.
“Help me understand the nuance, how they might be thinking about it, what the right way to respond is, but don’t give me the answer,” Shumer said of how users could best communicate with a bot.
UNDERSTAND YOUR BIASES
Although many turn to AI because they think it will yield an objective response, the advice a chatbot can give you will only ever be as good as the information you feed it. And many chatbots are aiming to please you, so they’re more likely to tell you you’re right if you’re seeking advice about an argument or another complex situation.
If you only present your own perspective when asking for help with how to handle a fight with a partner, the chatbot likely wouldn’t be able to offer an objective take.
Liesel Sharabi, director of the Relationships and Technology Lab at Arizona State University, said providing a chatbot with as much information as you can from both sides of a situation — yours and your partner’s — can help, but it isn’t a cure all for combating the sycophantic nature of the bot.
“Hopefully, if you were having a problem in your relationship you wouldn’t make all of your decisions based on what one friend told you, right? Don’t do that with AI either — use it as one data point among many,” she said.
June 29 to July 5 The daily morning flag raising ceremony at Laosong Elementary School (老松國小) was once a sight to behold, with thousands of students lined up on the main field. Boasting a record 11,110 students in 1966, the school wasn’t just the most populous primary institution in Taiwan — most sources claim it was the world’s most attended. At a time when students had to pass entrance exams to attend junior high, Laosong became a magnet school due to its high advancement rate. According to news reports, 12 buses transported students to the campus in Taipei’s Wanhua District
“You have several different internship experiences across different industries,” the interviewer told Hazel Lin (林敏淳). “But they are still internships, not jobs. Why should we hire you? What are you actually capable of?” It was a blunt question. It is also the question increasingly faced by many young Taiwanese workers trying to enter the AI economy, which is a key factor in transforming Taiwan into an indispensable global “AI island.” Lin studied international business, worked in marketing, supply-chain coordination and sustainability events, received a Master’s degree in customer relationship management in Germany and was completing an applied AI training program in Taiwan.
“Restarting” cross-strait dialogue, contends Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), is the only way to avoid “Taiwan becoming the next Ukraine.” Presenting Taiwan negatively as the “next Ukraine” has become a staple of pro-KMT and pro-China discourse. The alignment of “Taiwan as Ukraine” with People’s Republic of China (PRC) trope needs unpacking. It is part of a package of narratives that serve a variety of PRC propaganda needs. Restarting talks? We don’t have government to government talks because the PRC rejects them. We can have talks any time the PRC wants, it just doesn’t want to. Indeed, it is
For a nation facing a potentially existential military threat from an aggressive, hostile neighbor, Taiwanese have a curious relationship both politically and culturally with the armed forces that stand between them and invasion. That needs to change, but historical baggage is hard to shed. In 1993, a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker made some disparaging remarks about military veterans. Outraged, a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker flipped over a table and came at him in a rage, fists swinging. The DPP lawmaker was hospitalized as a result. Video of the incident is available on YouTube. Today’s violence in the legislature
RSS