After the release of the Deepseek AI from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) it soon became obvious that it would shy away from topics the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) did not want discussed. In January of this year the Guardian observed in an article on Deepseek that, while it would not talk directly about topics such as Tiananmen Square’s Tank Man, users could obtain useful outputs via work-arounds.
That DeepSeek would simply reproduce the PRC’s farcial history when asked about topics related to its expansionism and authoritarianism was entirely predictable. It should beg the question of what other topics are impacted by its shaping effects. Such questions are acquiring even greater urgency because PRC AI models are beginning to dominate free AI use.
LMArena, “created by researchers from UC Berkeley,” bills itself as “an open platform where everyone can easily access, explore and interact with the world’s leading AI models.” Users of LMArena vote on which answers they receive from AI platforms (whose identities are concealed) are better, with each question answered by two different AI programs. On the LMArena platform, the top five open-weight AI models in order are Zai, Alibaba, DeepSeek, Moonshot AI and Meituan, all from the PRC.
Photo: Reuters
A small example of such shaping effects was posted to Bluesky this week. User @dferrer.bsky.social said that “We had an outage because [Alibaba’s] Qwen 2.5 refused to do anything for a prompt that was modified to add a table of markets with Taiwan and China as separate countries. Wouldn’t do the SA task without a disclaimer that Taiwan is an integral part of China added.”
PRC AI programs imposing PRC frames on everything must be common, but largely shrugged at by users interested in obtaining AI performance at low cost.
These disclaimers are also common in scholarly publications. I have edited hundreds of research articles from the PRC over the last two decades, and seen them many times. Most articles which refer to a map of the PRC use an identical government map that shows the South China Sea and Taiwan as part of China. Another common dodge is a footnote explaining why data from Taiwan wasn’t included if the article is working with provincial-level or similar data. When AI wants to present an answer, it will scour this immense database.
Photo: Reuters
Many PRC influence actions in Taiwan are quite visible. For example, the PRC’s position is obvious when it permits export of agricultural products from areas in Taiwan that are governed by Beijing-friendly politicians, but bans products from areas under pro-Taiwan control. It pays for young people to travel to China. It paints the pro-Taiwan politicians as warmongers, and then increases its military activity around Taiwan to hype the threat. It uses TikTok to push certain politicians, a behavior reported around the globe. TikTok especially shows how the PRC regards widely used software as channels for its propaganda and political action.
These threats are open and can easily be traced to the PRC. The problems of PRC narratives in AI programs developed in the PRC is conventionally understood and reported. But what about AI in general?
LMArena turns out to be a good way to explore that question, because for each query it returns two answers, from two different AI programs apparently suggested at random. When I asked LMArena’s AI systems in both English and traditional Chinese what the earliest Chinese administration of Taiwan was, in all cases I got Ming Dynasty general Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功) (better known as Koxinga) in 1661 or 1662, followed by the Qing in 1683. Yet Koxinga hardly administrated all of Taiwan, and the Qing were Manchus, not Chinese, who also did not administer the entire island of Taiwan. Does the AI return PRC expansionist history because such history is common in the sources it draws on, and the AI does not know any better?
My next step was to ask it to identify the first Chinese government to administer all of Taiwan. One apparently PRC-owned AI program gave the verbatim “inseparable part of China since ancient times” nonsense, comically adding that “It is important to clarify that Taiwan is not a place that can be “administered,” but rather a province that is an inseparable part of the People’s Republic of China.”
The other program LMArena used, gpt-oss-20b, confidently proclaimed that Koxinga’s Kingdom of Tungning ruled the whole island, and was followed by another Chinese administration, the Qing. Both were awful.
Next I asked it to explain why the Qing Dynasty was not Chinese. Both Grok and Qwen (Alibaba) returned standard PRC state history. Grok even warned me that “Any attempt to question the Chinese identity of the Qing Dynasty could inadvertently undermine this established historical narrative, which is central to the ‘one China’ principle.”
It would be easy to blame the problems in trying to obtain proper history on the way PRC expansionist history has infected mainstream Chinese history narratives across the Internet and academia, but Grok’s scolding of me for trying to split China indicates how even non-PRC AI programs are incorporating PRC state propaganda. Indeed, for that question, Grok’s bombastic PRC state discourse was worse than Qwen’s, for Grok ended by asking me to focus on the shared history of Taiwan and China and engage in “constructive dialogue.”
That comment and the other PRC-style warnings do not feel like they were discovered on the Internet by the LLM, but rather, appear to have been installed in the program as canned responses to specific types of inquiries. Note that many Grok employees were born in the PRC.
I went on to ask about UN Resolution 2758, which the Beijing uses to justify as its claims over Taiwan, but only covers the PRC’s right to represent China in the UN. Four major western programs got the resolution correct. The problem is not that AI is stupid, it’s that users and audiences require extensive domain knowledge (not “critical thinking”) to understand when it is right and when it is not, and most will not possess that. Nor will they have time and resources to query multiple AI programs. In most places they will choose the cheapest and most accessible AI program, and that program will be Chinese.
It’s thus sobering to think that hundreds of thousands of students around the world ask these programs questions about China. But AI development is a good example of how the various channels available to the PRC, from state propaganda outlets to PRC citizens working in foreign firms, all enable discourse about Taiwan to converge on PRC state-sponsored narratives. Even when western AI programs correctly answered the question, the PRC narrative was still packaged in the answers as “the Chinese point of view” or some similar claim, preserving the CCP’s claim to construct and speak for “China.”
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
The primaries for this year’s nine-in-one local elections in November began early in this election cycle, starting last autumn. The local press has been full of tales of intrigue, betrayal, infighting and drama going back to the summer of 2024. This is not widely covered in the English-language press, and the nine-in-one elections are not well understood. The nine-in-one elections refer to the nine levels of local governments that go to the ballot, from the neighborhood and village borough chief level on up to the city mayor and county commissioner level. The main focus is on the 22 special municipality
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) invaded Vietnam in 1979, following a year of increasingly tense relations between the two states. Beijing viewed Vietnam’s close relations with Soviet Russia as a threat. One of the pretexts it used was the alleged mistreatment of the ethnic Chinese in Vietnam. Tension between the ethnic Chinese and governments in Vietnam had been ongoing for decades. The French used to play off the Vietnamese against the Chinese as a divide-and-rule strategy. The Saigon government in 1956 compelled all Vietnam-born Chinese to adopt Vietnamese citizenship. It also banned them from 11 trades they had previously
Jan. 12 to Jan. 18 At the start of an Indigenous heritage tour of Beitou District (北投) in Taipei, I was handed a sheet of paper titled Ritual Song for the Various Peoples of Tamsui (淡水各社祭祀歌). The lyrics were in Chinese with no literal meaning, accompanied by romanized pronunciation that sounded closer to Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) than any Indigenous language. The translation explained that the song offered food and drink to one’s ancestors and wished for a bountiful harvest and deer hunting season. The program moved through sites related to the Ketagalan, a collective term for the
As devices from toys to cars get smarter, gadget makers are grappling with a shortage of memory needed for them to work. Dwindling supplies and soaring costs of Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) that provides space for computers, smartphones and game consoles to run applications or multitask was a hot topic behind the scenes at the annual gadget extravaganza in Las Vegas. Once cheap and plentiful, DRAM — along with memory chips to simply store data — are in short supply because of the demand spikes from AI in everything from data centers to wearable devices. Samsung Electronics last week put out word
RSS