After the release of the Deepseek AI from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) it soon became obvious that it would shy away from topics the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) did not want discussed. In January of this year the Guardian observed in an article on Deepseek that, while it would not talk directly about topics such as Tiananmen Square’s Tank Man, users could obtain useful outputs via work-arounds.
That DeepSeek would simply reproduce the PRC’s farcial history when asked about topics related to its expansionism and authoritarianism was entirely predictable. It should beg the question of what other topics are impacted by its shaping effects. Such questions are acquiring even greater urgency because PRC AI models are beginning to dominate free AI use.
LMArena, “created by researchers from UC Berkeley,” bills itself as “an open platform where everyone can easily access, explore and interact with the world’s leading AI models.” Users of LMArena vote on which answers they receive from AI platforms (whose identities are concealed) are better, with each question answered by two different AI programs. On the LMArena platform, the top five open-weight AI models in order are Zai, Alibaba, DeepSeek, Moonshot AI and Meituan, all from the PRC.
Photo: Reuters
A small example of such shaping effects was posted to Bluesky this week. User @dferrer.bsky.social said that “We had an outage because [Alibaba’s] Qwen 2.5 refused to do anything for a prompt that was modified to add a table of markets with Taiwan and China as separate countries. Wouldn’t do the SA task without a disclaimer that Taiwan is an integral part of China added.”
PRC AI programs imposing PRC frames on everything must be common, but largely shrugged at by users interested in obtaining AI performance at low cost.
These disclaimers are also common in scholarly publications. I have edited hundreds of research articles from the PRC over the last two decades, and seen them many times. Most articles which refer to a map of the PRC use an identical government map that shows the South China Sea and Taiwan as part of China. Another common dodge is a footnote explaining why data from Taiwan wasn’t included if the article is working with provincial-level or similar data. When AI wants to present an answer, it will scour this immense database.
Photo: Reuters
Many PRC influence actions in Taiwan are quite visible. For example, the PRC’s position is obvious when it permits export of agricultural products from areas in Taiwan that are governed by Beijing-friendly politicians, but bans products from areas under pro-Taiwan control. It pays for young people to travel to China. It paints the pro-Taiwan politicians as warmongers, and then increases its military activity around Taiwan to hype the threat. It uses TikTok to push certain politicians, a behavior reported around the globe. TikTok especially shows how the PRC regards widely used software as channels for its propaganda and political action.
These threats are open and can easily be traced to the PRC. The problems of PRC narratives in AI programs developed in the PRC is conventionally understood and reported. But what about AI in general?
LMArena turns out to be a good way to explore that question, because for each query it returns two answers, from two different AI programs apparently suggested at random. When I asked LMArena’s AI systems in both English and traditional Chinese what the earliest Chinese administration of Taiwan was, in all cases I got Ming Dynasty general Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功) (better known as Koxinga) in 1661 or 1662, followed by the Qing in 1683. Yet Koxinga hardly administrated all of Taiwan, and the Qing were Manchus, not Chinese, who also did not administer the entire island of Taiwan. Does the AI return PRC expansionist history because such history is common in the sources it draws on, and the AI does not know any better?
My next step was to ask it to identify the first Chinese government to administer all of Taiwan. One apparently PRC-owned AI program gave the verbatim “inseparable part of China since ancient times” nonsense, comically adding that “It is important to clarify that Taiwan is not a place that can be “administered,” but rather a province that is an inseparable part of the People’s Republic of China.”
The other program LMArena used, gpt-oss-20b, confidently proclaimed that Koxinga’s Kingdom of Tungning ruled the whole island, and was followed by another Chinese administration, the Qing. Both were awful.
Next I asked it to explain why the Qing Dynasty was not Chinese. Both Grok and Qwen (Alibaba) returned standard PRC state history. Grok even warned me that “Any attempt to question the Chinese identity of the Qing Dynasty could inadvertently undermine this established historical narrative, which is central to the ‘one China’ principle.”
It would be easy to blame the problems in trying to obtain proper history on the way PRC expansionist history has infected mainstream Chinese history narratives across the Internet and academia, but Grok’s scolding of me for trying to split China indicates how even non-PRC AI programs are incorporating PRC state propaganda. Indeed, for that question, Grok’s bombastic PRC state discourse was worse than Qwen’s, for Grok ended by asking me to focus on the shared history of Taiwan and China and engage in “constructive dialogue.”
That comment and the other PRC-style warnings do not feel like they were discovered on the Internet by the LLM, but rather, appear to have been installed in the program as canned responses to specific types of inquiries. Note that many Grok employees were born in the PRC.
I went on to ask about UN Resolution 2758, which the Beijing uses to justify as its claims over Taiwan, but only covers the PRC’s right to represent China in the UN. Four major western programs got the resolution correct. The problem is not that AI is stupid, it’s that users and audiences require extensive domain knowledge (not “critical thinking”) to understand when it is right and when it is not, and most will not possess that. Nor will they have time and resources to query multiple AI programs. In most places they will choose the cheapest and most accessible AI program, and that program will be Chinese.
It’s thus sobering to think that hundreds of thousands of students around the world ask these programs questions about China. But AI development is a good example of how the various channels available to the PRC, from state propaganda outlets to PRC citizens working in foreign firms, all enable discourse about Taiwan to converge on PRC state-sponsored narratives. Even when western AI programs correctly answered the question, the PRC narrative was still packaged in the answers as “the Chinese point of view” or some similar claim, preserving the CCP’s claim to construct and speak for “China.”
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
By global standards, the traffic congestion that afflicts Taiwan’s urban areas isn’t horrific. But nor is it something the country can be proud of. According to TomTom, a Dutch developer of location and navigation technologies, last year Taiwan was the sixth most congested country in Asia. Of the 492 towns and cities included in its rankings last year, Taipei was the 74th most congested. Taoyuan ranked 105th, while Hsinchu County (121st), Taichung (142nd), Tainan (173rd), New Taipei City (227th), Kaohsiung (241st) and Keelung (302nd) also featured on the list. Four Japanese cities have slower traffic than Taipei. (Seoul, which has some
Michael slides a sequin glove over the pop star’s tarnished legacy, shrouding Michael Jackson’s complications with a conventional biopic that, if you cover your ears, sounds great. Antoine Fuqua’s movie is sanctioned by Jackson’s estate and its producers include the estate’s executors. So it is, by its nature, a narrow, authorized perspective on Jackson. The film ends before the flood of allegations of sexual abuse of children, or Jackson’s own acknowledgment of sleeping alongside kids. Jackson and his estate have long maintained his innocence. In his only criminal trial, in 2005, Jackson was acquitted. Michael doesn’t even subtly nod to these facts.
Writing of the finds at the ancient iron-working site of Shihsanhang (十 三行) in New Taipei City’s Bali District (八里), archaeologist Tsang Cheng-hwa (臧振華) of the Academia Sinica’s Institute of History and Philology observes: “One bronze bowl gilded with gold, together with copper coins and fragments of Tang and Song ceramics, were also found. These provide evidence for early contact between Taiwan aborigines and Chinese.” The Shihsanhang Web site from the Ministry of Culture says of the finds: “They were evidence that the residents of the area had a close trading relation with Chinese civilians, as the coins can be
During her 2015 trip to Taiwan, Sophia J. Chang (張詠慧) got fewer answers than she’d hoped for, but more revelations than she could have imagined. “That was the year I last saw my grandmother. She was in hospice care in Tainan, and it was painful to see her in bed, barely able to open her eyes,” says Los Angeles-born Chang. “The grandma I’d known, a fantastic cook and incredibly kind, was already gone.” After their visit, Chang and her grandfather went back to his apartment. There she asked him how he’d met her grandmother. “He hesitated, then started talking a bit.
RSS