South Korean actor Simon Lee was stunned when he saw his likeness — at times as a gynecologist or a surgeon — being used to promote questionable health cures on TikTok and Instagram.
He is one of scores of people who have licensed their image to AI marketing companies, and then ended up with the unpleasant surprise of seeing themselves feature in deepfakes, dubious adverts or even political propaganda.
“If it was a nice advertisement, it would’ve been fine to me. But obviously it is such a scam,” he said, adding that the terms of his contract prevented him from getting the videos removed.
Photo: Reuters
The result was that he was left him with his digital clone advocating for lemon balm tea to lose weight or ice baths to fight acne.
AI technology — cheaper than filming actors, but more realistic than an entirely AI-generated avatar — allows firms to build catalogs of digital models to appear in videos that mostly promote products or services.
Solene Vasseur, a digital communications and AI consultant, said this new form of advertising was fast and cheap compared to a real-life production.
Using avatars is also a way for brands to “show that they’re comfortable with the new tools.”
The method is quick and straightforward: half a day’s shooting, a green screen and a teleprompter.
The actor has to display different emotions, which will allow the artificial intelligence to make the avatar say all sorts of things, in an infinite number of languages.
“The performance in terms of the expressiveness of a real human — voice, facial movements, body language... is still superior to anything AI can generate right now,” said Alexandru Voica, head of corporate affairs at Synthesia, a UK-based industry leader.
To make a video, the platform’s customers just have to select a face, a language, a tone — such as serious or playful — and insert the script. The whole process comes at a modest price: the ultra-basic version is free, while the pro version costs a few hundred euros.
’AM I CROSSING A LINE?’
The contracts offer up to a few thousand euros, depending on duration and how well a person is known.
But they can be filled with legal jargon and sometimes abusive clauses, and in their rush to make quick cash, some people have found it hard to fully understand what they were signing up for.
Such was the case of Adam Coy, a 29-year-old actor and director based in New York, selling his image was a financial decision.
In October last year, he signed over the rights to his face and voice to MCM for US$1,000, granting the company the use of his avatar for one year.
“If I was more successful, I feel like I would maybe be able to have the ethical conversation with myself,” he said. “Is this right, or am I crossing a line by doing this?”
A few months later, his partner’s mother came across videos in which his digital clone claimed to come from the future and announced disasters to come.
None of this is forbidden by the contract, which only prohibits use for pornographic purposes, or in connection with alcohol and tobacco. Coy described the experience of watching his avatar as “surreal” and said he initially thought he would be an animated avatar.
But “it’s decent money for little work”, he added.
PROPAGANDA
British actor and model Connor Yeates, who signed a three-year contract with Synthesia for US$5,235, also encountered an unpleasant surprise in 2022.
At the time, he was sleeping on a friend’s sofa, he told British newspaper << “I don’t have rich parents and needed the money,” he said. This seemed like a “good opportunity.” But he then discovered that his image had been used to promote Ibrahim Traore, the president of Burkina Faso who took power in a coup in 2022. “Three years ago, a few videos slipped our content moderation partly because there was a gap in our enforcement for factually accurate but polarizing type content or videos with exaggerated claims or propaganda, for example.” said Voica, head of corporate affairs at Synthesia. The firm said it has introduced new procedures but other platforms have since appeared, some applying much less stringent rules. An AFP journalist was able to make an avatar from one of these platforms say outrageous things. “The clients I’ve worked with didn’t fully understand what they were agreeing to at the time,” said Alyssa Malchiodi, a lawyer who specializes in business law. “One major red flag is the use of broad, perpetual and irrevocable language that gives the company full ownership or unrestricted rights to use a creator’s voice, image and likeness across any medium,” she said. Contracts often contain clauses considered abusive, Malchiodi said, such as worldwide, unlimited, irrevocable exploitation, with no right of withdrawal. “Technology is evolving faster than courts or legislatures can respond,” the lawyer said. “These are not invented faces,” she said, calling for more caution.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS