Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months.
Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in 1929.
Deputy Director-General Chen Chen-cheng (陳建成) said that the Taiwanese citizens in violation of the law had been receiving notices to supply the necessary documentation for months.
Photo: Reuters
The notices had been issued long before the government kicked out the notorious three PRC influencers whose dependent-based residency permits it revoked last month for “reunification” comments made online.
Most of the 10,000 people failed to provide documentation because of health problems related to the COVID-19 pandemic and paperwork issues, Chen said.
It’s 2025. Pandemic eased a couple of years ago. It is easy to ask: would any other naturalized citizens be shown such forbearance, permitted to keep their old citizenship for years after naturalizing? But that question is wrong.
Photo: EPA-EFE
No, these 10,000 cases don’t show the government’s leniency or harshness (cue: “Green terror!”) towards PRC citizens. Rather, it shows, once again, the stupidity, rigidity and deep racism of Taiwan’s immigration laws. If Taiwan had a reasonable 5-7 year path to dual citizenship, these people would not be facing onerous and risky returns to the PRC to get paperwork, and the government would not be looking like it has picked a specific population to terrorize.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and other PRC-aligned parties lost no time in pouncing. On Thursday last week, New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) went to the NIA to “turn himself in,” after being notified that he had failed to provide proof of having renounced his Chinese household registration. He naturalized in 1995, before the requirements. You’s move was a potent political stunt.
KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) chastised the government, saying that chasing twenty-year-old bureaucratic violations is a violation of human rights. It must be admitted that the KMT knows a thing or two about violating human rights.
Photo: Wang Kuan-jen, Taipei Times
Yes, bad policy always creates bad optics.
THE DUAL DILEMMA
What the government should be doing is giving them all an amnesty and then changing the laws to permit all residents to become Taiwanese. The distortions in Taiwan’s immigration system occur because the government keeps evading the possibility of a dual citizenship path. Hence, it must constantly spawn new categories of immigration exceptions that gradually evolve into permanent problems, like the status of PRC spouses. Similar categories easily come to mind: the stateless children of runaway migrant workers, for instance. The government would rather have thousands of stateless children in Taiwan than offer them what might become dual citizenship.
The lack of a clear, universal dual nationality path is part of the “hypocrisy of sovereignty,” as scholar Isabelle Cheng terms it.
“This hypocrisy is manifested by Taiwan’s flexibility towards Japanese citizens’ unavailability of renunciation, in contrast to Taiwan’s rigidity towards Vietnamese citizens and its pragmatism of using household registration as a make-believe nationality for Chinese citizens,” she notes.
The cross-strait relations act defines PRC spouses as neither foreign nor domestic but “special.” Foreign spouses must relinquish their original nationality, but Chinese spouses are required only to cancel their household registration in China. The PRC, she observes, winks at this practice.
She contrasts this, and Taiwan’s acceptance of Japan’s refusal to permit its people to give up their citizenship, with Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia. The latter three accept the PRC’s claim to sovereignty over Taiwan, but treat Republic of China (ROC) sovereignty as real for the purposes of its citizens who wish to acquire ROC citizenship and give up their own.
In ROC practice, foreigners are treated as inferiors who are costly sites of (cultural) contamination and disease that may erode Taiwan’s competitiveness, says Cheng, particularly those from Southeast Asia. That is the reason the government in 2005 added Chinese language proficiency as a prerequisite for naturalization, she observes.
Time has not mellowed that racism. In November of 2024, the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) rejected a petition from thousands of long-term residents asking the government to establish a dual citizenship path.
“If foreign nationals who have lived permanently for five years [in Taiwan] can naturalize without having to prove the loss of their original nationality, it may have a significant negative impact on our country’s finances, social welfare and national security,” the MOI said.
The Taiwan government also imagines that “culture” is an identifiable, eternal, immutable thing whose purity requires that pesky foreigners be kept at arm’s length.
Clearly the government thinks of foreigners as irritants, not participants. If we are so costly, why does Taiwan keep asking for workers from abroad?
POPULATION PROBLEMS
One of the leaders of the rejected dual citizenship petition effort described Taiwan’s most recent demographic statistics on Bluesky the other day: “Taiwan’s population declined by 25,278 people in the first quarter of 2025. Births declined by 7 percent year-on-year. Crude birth rate is down to 5.08 percent. Demographic decline is starting to pick up speed, on track for population decline of 100,000 in 2025, compared to 20,000 in 2024.”
Taiwan’s massive shortage of labor is only going to get worse. The problem is not that people are avoiding work: the February 2025 unemployment rate was the lowest for that month in 25 years. There simply are not enough warm bodies. The government, which has its usual policy of temporary solutions to permanent crises, has mooted bringing in more “migrant workers,” another exceptional category that lies at the intersection of racism and the lack of a dual citizenship path. The mirror category of “migrant worker” is “Gold Card,” another exception created as a dual citizenship dodge.
Dual citizenship is no panacea for Taiwan’s plummeting birthrate and shrinking population, as immigrants do not have significantly more children. But citizenship is an important perk for people looking at countries to work and live in. In fact, one of the PRC citizens just captured in Ukraine said that he had joined the Russian army to obtain Russian citizenship.
If foreign citizenship is considered so valuable that people will risk death in war to obtain it, perhaps the government could get a leg up on competitor states by offering it to people who come to work peacefully in Taiwan.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
A couple of weeks ago the parties aligned with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), voted in the legislature to eliminate the subsidy that enables Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) to keep up with its burgeoning debt, and instead pay for universal cash handouts worth NT$10,000. The subsidy would have been NT$100 billion, while the cash handout had a budget of NT$235 billion. The bill mandates that the cash payments must be completed by Oct. 31 of this year. The changes were part of the overall NT$545 billion budget approved
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
RSS