After several dashed predictions, quantum computing is accelerating rapidly with actual use cases and scientific breakthroughs expected within years, not decades. US tech giants, startups, banks and pharmaceutical companies are pouring investments into this revolutionary technology.
Here’s what to know about tech that may change the world, but can be hard to decipher:
BEYOND 0 AND 1
Photo: Reuters
While classical computing relies on bits with just two states (0 or 1), quantum computing harnesses “qubits” with infinite possible states.
Each added qubit theoretically doubles computing capacity, allowing quantum computers to analyze countless possibilities simultaneously, solving in minutes what might take millions of years classically.
“Classical computers are speaking the wrong language. In quantum we’re almost speaking the language of nature,” said John Levy, CEO of hybrid chip developer SEEQC. “This unlocks previously unsolvable problems.”
Microsoft recently unveiled quantum technology based on an entirely new state of matter — neither solid, gas nor liquid. Levy’s verdict: “They should win a Nobel Prize.”
‘EFFICIENCY RACE’
Given its exponential computing power, Levy believes quantum’s potential exceeds our “limited imagination,” especially when paired with AI.
Some even view quantum computing as the only path to “superintelligent” AI with superior cognitive abilities.
Practically speaking, quantum technology will dramatically accelerate discovery of new molecules — extending the periodic table learned at school.
This will mean new materials, breakthrough medications, advanced fabrics, complex financial models and super-efficient batteries.
Philosopher and investor Anders Indset foresees an “efficiency race” transforming everything from agriculture to transportation.
“We’ll have hyper-efficient, lighter cars and cheaper, cleaner air travel methods.”
TOO MUCH NOISE
Quantum computers already operate today.
IBM claims its quantum services have generated sales of US$1 billion, though current applications remain limited mainly to research.
The market will initially expand through servers equipped with specialized chips and systems. “We are now switching from quantum theory to the quantum economy,” said Indset.
This explains why cloud leaders Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are jumping in.
“The drive is to be leader in trillion dollar industries,” Indset added.
The giants, already in a furious race to lead on AI, are heavily investing to solve quantum’s biggest challenge: calculation errors.
Qubits require sub-freezing temperatures and are extremely sensitive to environmental “noise” — vibrations, heat, electromagnetic interference — that cause computational errors.
Google’s new Willow quantum chip and Amazon’s Ocelot semiconductor prototype aim to dramatically reduce these errors and costs.
“We’re witnessing the creation of an ecosystem,” said Levy, the CEO, noting that pharmaceutical giant Merck is investing in SEEQC to secure access to future quantum tools.
IS IT SAFE?
The US and China are racing ahead in quantum development, with Washington imposing export restrictions on the technology.
Beyond competition, quantum computing poses serious cybersecurity concerns. Since qubits can test countless combinations simultaneously, they could potentially break conventional encryption methods.
US government agencies and tech companies like Apple are already developing “post-quantum” encryption to prepare for this new reality.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
RSS