Sometimes I like to start a column by asking myself: should this really be a column that will live on the Internet forever, for all and sundry to see? Or is this really an airing of my many neuroses that is better shared privately, with a therapist?
Not infrequently the answer is the latter. But therapy is expensive and comment is free, so I’m afraid, dear reader, that you’re going to have to be my shrink today. And I’ll get straight into my issues: I have a voice in my head that won’t shut up.
Before you get too alarmed, the voice isn’t telling me to do dastardly things, or trying to convince me that I’m Jesus. It’s just a constant inner monologue. This inner voice isn’t a bad thing per se; often it’s useful, occasionally it’s entertaining. Sometimes it’s annoying as hell, though: it keeps me up at night replaying past conversations I’ve had and coming up with all the things I should have said. When things get stressful — and the world has been very stressful lately — then all this inner chatter can get very overwhelming.
Photo: EPA-EFE
Chances are you know exactly what I’m talking about, because you have an inner auditory narrator too. A lot of people do. I used to assume everyone in the world did until a tweet went viral a few years ago announcing that some people don’t. Now a variation of that tweet seems to go viral every year.
“Yo wtf…just saw a stat that said only 30-50% of people have an internal dialogue,” one podcaster tweeted in 2022, for example. “There’s really 50%+ of the population out here walking around with NOTHING going on in their head?? Everything is starting to make much more sense.”
While tweets like this have sparked a fascinating mainstream discussion about the different ways we think, they tend to be extremely simplistic summations of a very complex phenomenon. (I know, the idea that a tweet might be overly simplistic is shocking, right?!) There isn’t a clearcut binary between people who have internal voices and people who don’t. And research shows that the nature of our inner voices varies dramatically as well. Some of us might hear our own voice while others might experience the world — as the subject of a 2021 Guardian feature did — via a bickering Italian couple in their head.
CONFUSION
Speaking to me over the phone (I promise he’s not just a voice in my head), Russell Hurlburt, a psychology professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who has done pioneering work in this field, notes that most of us are very confused about our inner experiences. Even those of us who, like me, are sure that we have an inner monologue going on all the damn time probably don’t — we’re probably just talking to ourselves a certain percentage of the time. Basically, we’re all unreliable narrators.
To try to land on a more objective way of measuring how people experience the world, Hurlburt came up with a method called descriptive experience sampling, where participants are given beepers and then told to jot down their inner experience whenever the beeper goes off. After training people for a while on this method, he says, you get to a more accurate representation of what’s actually going on in their head. He’s been doing this for more than 50 years.
And what is going on in people’s heads? Well, what Hurlburt found is that when you do the beeper experiment, people have an inner voice roughly 25 percent of the time. What that means, he says, is that “some people never have words going on, and a few people have words going on all the time, and a lot of people have words going on some of the time.”
Now, all of this might be an accurate way of putting things, but it’s not exactly viral tweet material, is it? I kept trying to ask Hurlburt to give me a specific percentage of people who never speak to themselves, so I could have a nice flashy headline saying something like “30 percent of people don’t have an inner monologue at all, they see the world in cartoons,” but he was far too detail-oriented to give one to me. All he’d say is that the number of people who don’t think in words is more than you’d expect.
As for that 30-50 percent figure in the viral tweet I mentioned earlier? That comes from Hurlburt’s research but is a misrepresentation of the fact that the test subject only had the inner voice going on when the beeper went off. It doesn’t mean that 30-50 percent of the population don’t have an inner voice at all in any circumstance.
Anyway, there are two big takeaways from all of this. The first is that it’s always useful to remember that we all experience “reality” in completely different ways. Our brains are miraculous and extremely weird things, and everyone has a different way of processing the world. And the second big takeaway is that you should never immediately trust a statistic that you see on Twitter (now X).
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
A couple of weeks ago the parties aligned with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), voted in the legislature to eliminate the subsidy that enables Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) to keep up with its burgeoning debt, and instead pay for universal cash handouts worth NT$10,000. The subsidy would have been NT$100 billion, while the cash handout had a budget of NT$235 billion. The bill mandates that the cash payments must be completed by Oct. 31 of this year. The changes were part of the overall NT$545 billion budget approved
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
RSS