After The People’s Republic of China (PRC) published 22 new guidelines on June 21 that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death “Taiwan independence separatists,” the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) upgraded its travel advisory to the PRC and the Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of Hong Kong and Macau to level 3, or “orange” alert, meaning Taiwanese nationals shouldn’t visit unless “absolutely necessary.”
Surveying commuters in Taipei’s bustling Main Station on Thursday, the Taipei Times found only 20 percent of people we spoke to had not heard that the travel alert had been raised to orange.
Similarly, only 30 percent had not heard of a Taiwanese traveler who was briefly held in Hong Kong due to his name being similar to a former Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) legislator named Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) when Romanized.
Photo: Daniel Oh
When asked if they’d consider visiting the PRC or the two SARs for work or tourism given the current travel advisory, 70 percent of respondents said they would not, with most expressing some concern for their safety in light of current cross-strait tensions. A troubling 30 percent of respondents said they’d even been worried transferring planes in a PRC or SAR airport.
However, Chang Cheng from New Taipei City said he’d visit Hong Kong again as he’d enjoyed his time there before and had a lot of friends in the territory. Similarly, 18-year-old Lin Chung-che, who has previously visited Shanghai, said he’d happily travel to the PRC or Hong Kong, although he has no immediate plans to do so.
A retired science teacher from Taipei who identified as Joe Kuo told the Taipei Times he’d been to the PRC 20 times in the past for tourism and work but wouldn’t go now due to safety concerns.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Similarly, 70-year-old retiree Lin Yu-chuan who has visited Hangzhou, Xiamen and Shanghai in the past and describes the landscape of the PRC as “beautiful” would not visit. Lin also bemoaned Hong Kong’s reduced appeal as a destination as somewhere that was “no longer lively” and in “economic decline,” which should “serve as a warning to Taiwan.”
Alice Lin, a 27-year-old teacher in New Taipei City, said she wouldn’t go in the current climate, although she maintains a dream to visit the pandas in their home environment of Sichuan and would do so should travel safety improve.
Only half of respondents said they’d let PRC policy influence travel opportunities in Myanmar, Laos or Cambodia — Southeast Asian countries with which Beijing maintains close ties and extradition treaties.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Kuo told the Taipei Times he simply wouldn’t visit any country that was “Communist” including Vietnam and North Korea.
When asked if they were concerned if any Western countries, which currently exclude “political offenses” from their extradition with China, might align with Beijing in the future, only 30 percent agreed, with most considering Western destinations “safe” in both the short and medium term.
However, Lin Ching-yu, a 36-year-old nurse, said “politics is always changing, you have to keep an eye on it and check up-to-date government warnings.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
A freelancer from Tainan, Miss Liu, expressed concerns for any Taiwan national traveling to the Russia Federation, given Moscow’s strengthening ties with Beijing.
Of those we spoke with, only 30 percent felt they had done something that might make them a target of Beijing, including attending a Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil, arguing with PRC citizens online and gathering outside the Legislative Yuan to protest the recent reform bill.
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
Aug. 4 to Aug. 10 When Coca-Cola finally pushed its way into Taiwan’s market in 1968, it allegedly vowed to wipe out its major domestic rival Hey Song within five years. But Hey Song, which began as a manual operation in a family cow shed in 1925, had proven its resilience, surviving numerous setbacks — including the loss of autonomy and nearly all its assets due to the Japanese colonial government’s wartime economic policy. By the 1960s, Hey Song had risen to the top of Taiwan’s beverage industry. This success was driven not only by president Chang Wen-chi’s
Last week, on the heels of the recall election that turned out so badly for Taiwan, came the news that US President Donald Trump had blocked the transit of President William Lai (賴清德) through the US on his way to Latin America. A few days later the international media reported that in June a scheduled visit by Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) for high level meetings was canceled by the US after China’s President Xi Jinping (習近平) asked Trump to curb US engagement with Taiwan during a June phone call. The cancellation of Lai’s transit was a gaudy
The centuries-old fiery Chinese spirit baijiu (白酒), long associated with business dinners, is being reshaped to appeal to younger generations as its makers adapt to changing times. Mostly distilled from sorghum, the clear but pungent liquor contains as much as 60 percent alcohol. It’s the usual choice for toasts of gan bei (乾杯), the Chinese expression for bottoms up, and raucous drinking games. “If you like to drink spirits and you’ve never had baijiu, it’s kind of like eating noodles but you’ve never had spaghetti,” said Jim Boyce, a Canadian writer and wine expert who founded World Baijiu Day a decade
RSS