After The People’s Republic of China (PRC) published 22 new guidelines on June 21 that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death “Taiwan independence separatists,” the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) upgraded its travel advisory to the PRC and the Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of Hong Kong and Macau to level 3, or “orange” alert, meaning Taiwanese nationals shouldn’t visit unless “absolutely necessary.”
Surveying commuters in Taipei’s bustling Main Station on Thursday, the Taipei Times found only 20 percent of people we spoke to had not heard that the travel alert had been raised to orange.
Similarly, only 30 percent had not heard of a Taiwanese traveler who was briefly held in Hong Kong due to his name being similar to a former Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) legislator named Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) when Romanized.
Photo: Daniel Oh
When asked if they’d consider visiting the PRC or the two SARs for work or tourism given the current travel advisory, 70 percent of respondents said they would not, with most expressing some concern for their safety in light of current cross-strait tensions. A troubling 30 percent of respondents said they’d even been worried transferring planes in a PRC or SAR airport.
However, Chang Cheng from New Taipei City said he’d visit Hong Kong again as he’d enjoyed his time there before and had a lot of friends in the territory. Similarly, 18-year-old Lin Chung-che, who has previously visited Shanghai, said he’d happily travel to the PRC or Hong Kong, although he has no immediate plans to do so.
A retired science teacher from Taipei who identified as Joe Kuo told the Taipei Times he’d been to the PRC 20 times in the past for tourism and work but wouldn’t go now due to safety concerns.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Similarly, 70-year-old retiree Lin Yu-chuan who has visited Hangzhou, Xiamen and Shanghai in the past and describes the landscape of the PRC as “beautiful” would not visit. Lin also bemoaned Hong Kong’s reduced appeal as a destination as somewhere that was “no longer lively” and in “economic decline,” which should “serve as a warning to Taiwan.”
Alice Lin, a 27-year-old teacher in New Taipei City, said she wouldn’t go in the current climate, although she maintains a dream to visit the pandas in their home environment of Sichuan and would do so should travel safety improve.
Only half of respondents said they’d let PRC policy influence travel opportunities in Myanmar, Laos or Cambodia — Southeast Asian countries with which Beijing maintains close ties and extradition treaties.
Photo: Daniel Oh
Kuo told the Taipei Times he simply wouldn’t visit any country that was “Communist” including Vietnam and North Korea.
When asked if they were concerned if any Western countries, which currently exclude “political offenses” from their extradition with China, might align with Beijing in the future, only 30 percent agreed, with most considering Western destinations “safe” in both the short and medium term.
However, Lin Ching-yu, a 36-year-old nurse, said “politics is always changing, you have to keep an eye on it and check up-to-date government warnings.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
A freelancer from Tainan, Miss Liu, expressed concerns for any Taiwan national traveling to the Russia Federation, given Moscow’s strengthening ties with Beijing.
Of those we spoke with, only 30 percent felt they had done something that might make them a target of Beijing, including attending a Tiananmen Square Massacre vigil, arguing with PRC citizens online and gathering outside the Legislative Yuan to protest the recent reform bill.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
When the South Vietnamese capital of Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese forces 50 years ago this week, it prompted a mass exodus of some 2 million people — hundreds of thousands fleeing perilously on small boats across open water to escape the communist regime. Many ultimately settled in Southern California’s Orange County in an area now known as “Little Saigon,” not far from Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, where the first refugees were airlifted upon reaching the US. The diaspora now also has significant populations in Virginia, Texas and Washington state, as well as in countries including France and Australia.
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS