Once again, we are listening to the government talk about bringing in foreign workers to help local manufacturing. Speaking at an investment summit in Washington DC, the Minister of Economic Affairs, J.W. Kuo (郭智輝), said that the nation must attract about 400,000 to 500,000 skilled foreign workers for high end manufacturing by 2040 to offset the falling population.
That’s roughly 15 years from now. Using the lower number, Taiwan would have to import over 25,000 foreigners a year for these positions to reach that goal.
The government has no idea what this sounds like to outsiders and to foreigners already living here. Because that same week, Workforce Development Agency Director-General Tsai Meng-liang (蔡孟良) was saying that Taiwan would import 1,000 migrant workers from India on a trial basis for use in local manufacturing firms next year. Laudably, the government broadly hinted that they would not be hired through the current brokerage system, but through some government body.
Photo: Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Sadly, Tsai added that efforts would be made to ensure that the workers would not “destabilize” the country and would adapt to its language and culture.
I am sure the Indians already living happily here would be shocked to learn that they could potentially “destabilize” Taiwan.
Does the government think that India is not listening? Does no one imagine the effect of such words on the people listening to them?
Photo: Taipei Times
‘CONTROL BREACH’
The racism is so blatant, so deeply ingrained. A solid paper by Shan-Jan Sarah Liu and Tsung-Lun Alan Wan (“COVID success? For whom? Examining the political representation of migrants in Taiwan,” May 2024, Ethnic and Racial Studies) observed, after analyzing legislative speeches during the COVID pandemic, that migrant workers are described as threats to health when present in Taiwan. “Native citizens being painted as healthy, clean, pure, and civilized while migrant workers diseased inevitably leads to the fear of migrants, as well as exclusion of migrants through harsh policies and reforms,” they note, while migrant spouses, having entered native society somewhat, are subject to a mirrored discourse in which Taiwanese are their saviors from victimhood.
Because of this, in legislative debates “the strongest collocate associated with migrant workers is control breach (破口).” When migrant workers come into Taiwan and move about under their own initiative, they are often portrayed not as “entering” but as “breaching,” indicating a loss of control, one that metaphorically treats the workers as a form of infection. Director-General Tsai was merely reassuring the public that control would be maintained. Even the tiny number of 1,000 individuals triggered this deep racism.
Now imagine that it is 25,000 or more skilled foreign workers each year. They are not going to accept being policed in dorms with curfews, or treated like an infectious disease. How will the government cope?
I ask this because the government has said that for the new group of Indians it could potentially breach the system of brokerage control and directly recruit them via some government entity erected for that purpose. The government may be able to veil its current system of racist power and control behind layers of third-party labor brokers and opaque corporate policies. It won’t be able to do that if its own people are running the labor brokerage systems.
For the first time, the government’s official racism may become a serious foreign policy issue, especially if the government itself is doing the recruiting.
The government’s focus on securing workers for manufacturing is hiding another burgeoning crisis, one intimately connected to migrant workers who have gone AWOL: Taiwan’s ancient farming population, whose average age is well above 60. We could use thousands of new young farmers as well, but since the government thinks of foreigners as workers, the focus has been on securing labor for farms, rather than securing farmers for the land.
MIGRANT FARM LABOR
According to government statistics, agriculture takes 5% of the workforce, over half a million people. In Taiwan 98,000 farmers over the age of 65 are still working their farms. Because the farming population is aging, the government has been focusing on developing smart assistive technologies such as wearable assistive devices to help with lifting that will enable aging farmers to extend their working life, and database technologies for capturing the “tacit knowledge” of farming that one only acquires via experience. The underlying assumption is that the work life of people in their declining years can be extended indefinitely. That is nonsense.
As the American science fiction writer Robert Heinlein once observed “There is nothing in this world so permanent as a temporary emergency.” The farm crisis in Taiwan goes back decades. It cannot be solved by applying various forms of assistive technology. It can only be solved by adding human beings.
For years the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has had programs in place to poach Taiwan farmers and their agricultural know-how, in order to address its own farm crisis. The result has been a steady flow of Taiwan varietals and farmers to the PRC. Yongfu Township in Fujian has so many Alishan specialties and tea masters its officials refer to it as “China’s Alishan,” according to a 2010 report in Commonwealth Magazine.
There is no reason people can’t flow in the other direction as well. Indeed, the repeated moves by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the years to establish some program or policy that permits PRC citizens to come to Taiwan to work in manufacturing and other industries suggests that at some point in the next decade it will occur to the one-track minds at the top of the KMT that farmers could be the right wedge to bring in PRC citizens (“Look at all the aged farmers! Look at all the fallow land in Taiwan!”).
The pro-Taiwan side has to get there first with a small trial program, not laborers, but young people who can work the land for long-term low rent-to-own or rent-to-citizenship programs. The focus should be on people from nations to the south who already have some know-how about working in the heated climate that is now the norm in Taiwan. Taiwan already has a program that gives scholarships to foreigners for studying agriculture. All we need to do is extend that to include some form of access to land. Then as it becomes successful, expand it.
Who knows? Maybe the presence of attractive, energetic young people with children, working and living as locals, will help address Taiwan’s pervasive racism problem.
That would in fact help stabilize society.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Every now and then, it’s nice to just point somewhere on a map and head out with no plan. In Taiwan, where convenience reigns, food options are plentiful and people are generally friendly and helpful, this type of trip is that much easier to pull off. One day last November, a spur-of-the-moment day hike in the hills of Chiayi County turned into a surprisingly memorable experience that impressed on me once again how fortunate we all are to call this island home. The scenery I walked through that day — a mix of forest and farms reaching up into the clouds
With one week left until election day, the drama is high in the race for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair. The race is still potentially wide open between the three frontrunners. The most accurate poll is done by Apollo Survey & Research Co (艾普羅民調公司), which was conducted a week and a half ago with two-thirds of the respondents party members, who are the only ones eligible to vote. For details on the candidates, check the Oct. 4 edition of this column, “A look at the KMT chair candidates” on page 12. The popular frontrunner was 56-year-old Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文)
“How China Threatens to Force Taiwan Into a Total Blackout” screamed a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) headline last week, yet another of the endless clickbait examples of the energy threat via blockade that doesn’t exist. Since the headline is recycled, I will recycle the rebuttal: once industrial power demand collapses (there’s a blockade so trade is gone, remember?) “a handful of shops and factories could run for months on coal and renewables, as Ko Yun-ling (柯昀伶) and Chao Chia-wei (趙家緯) pointed out in a piece at Taiwan Insight earlier this year.” Sadly, the existence of these facts will not stop the
Oct. 13 to Oct. 19 When ordered to resign from her teaching position in June 1928 due to her husband’s anti-colonial activities, Lin Shih-hao (林氏好) refused to back down. The next day, she still showed up at Tainan Second Preschool, where she was warned that she would be fired if she didn’t comply. Lin continued to ignore the orders and was eventually let go without severance — even losing her pay for that month. Rather than despairing, she found a non-government job and even joined her husband Lu Ping-ting’s (盧丙丁) non-violent resistance and labor rights movements. When the government’s 1931 crackdown
RSS