After her mother’s death, Elizabeth (not her real name) sought therapy to process the trauma of seeing her father abuse her mother while she was suffering from dementia.
With a lack of therapists on the New South Wales South Coast, she turned to online counseling platform BetterHelp, which claims to “remove the traditional barriers to therapy.”
BetterHelp’s Web site says it provides “affordable and accessible” care, and charges clients US$90 to US$120 a week to talk with a therapist “however you feel comfortable — text, chat, phone, or video … when you need it.”
Photo: AP
After matching with a therapist on Feb. 20, Elizabeth was immediately charged a monthly fee of US$296.64, discounting her first week of therapy.
However, she found the only available option — a 30-minute live therapy session — restrictive. During her first consultation, she felt pressure to rush her history, including her own abuse by her father during childhood.
She also hadn’t realized it was a US-based company and she would have to wake up at 3am Australian time to access the group therapy that was on offer.
Photo: Reuters
Elizabeth says she received daily reminders to use the platform’s journaling function but none of what she wrote was forwarded to her therapist. “I was anxious reliving a lot of stuff on a daily basis without getting a solution.”
Elizabeth canceled her subscription because she couldn’t justify US$90 a week during a cost-of-living crisis for a service she said wasn’t helping her.
NOT A CRISIS SERVICE
As BetterHelp looks to expand its Australian operations and customer base, mental health experts are concerned the US company’s subscription model risks creating therapeutic issues. There’s the potential for codependency, they say, and a lack of an endpoint for the therapy.
BetterHelp clients pay a month’s subscription upfront for one hour of a therapist’s time each week that includes either a 30 or 45 minute live session. The remaining time is for the therapist to send messages, emails and worksheets to clients.
Carly Dober, a psychologist and director of the Australian Association of Psychologists, says it is “ethically concerning” that clients are charged a month in advance — irrespective of how many sessions they attend — given mental health issues impact cognition, memory and a person’s ability to work. BetterHelp users also need to actively cancel subscriptions.
Frances Carlton, a clinical counselor who provided therapy sessions on BetterHelp, says the platform advertises itself as an affordable option but clients might be better off seeing someone in private practice when they need to.
While BetterHelp appears cheaper than traditional in-office therapy, clients who attend counseling in-person don’t pay for four weeks upfront “like a gym membership” and don’t have to attend every week to get value for money, Carlton says. Instead, they can choose how often they attend sessions.
Carlton also questions the value clients receive, when 30 or 45 minute live sessions aren’t long enough. She says in private practice she allows at least 75 minutes initially because after 45 minutes a client is just starting to get comfortable. After a few sessions, the therapist can reduce the time to an hour, she argues.
Carlton says while BetterHelp warns it is not a crisis service “the reality is clients get into crisis during sessions because of, sometimes, what they’re talking about.” She says she never sends those clients away when their time is up but under BetterHelp’s model “that’s exactly what you have to do”.
BetterHelp pays therapists US$30 an hour if they work up to five hours in a week. The rate increases by US$5 for every additional five hours worked until those doing a 40-hour week earn US$70 an hour. The platform does not pay overtime and deducts pay if a client logs on late, Carlton says.
Dober says BetterHelp’s rates of pay are below minimum wage under the applicable private sector award but contracting at the platform’s rates is legal.
Carlton says BetterHelp gives clients the illusion that therapists will be messaging every few days and advertises that “you can message your therapist at any time from anywhere”. However, the pay structure does not compensate therapists for that amount of work.
QUALITY OVER QUANTITY
Dober is also concerned BetterHelp requires clinicians to text patients every three days and respond to texts sent by patients within 24 hours and 48 hours on weekends.
“This can create a whole raft of therapeutic issues, such as poor boundaries, codependency, and it can affect the therapeutic relationship if the client perceives feeling forgotten or not important if realistic and supportive communication timeline expectations are not managed at the outset,” Dober says.
Associate Prof Andrew Campbell, a psychologist and the chair of the Cyberpsychology Research Group at the University of Sydney, says if the model of care is “too enmeshed” clients may believe their counselor can help them solve every problem. Campbell is also concerned about a lack of so-called exit points.
“There’s a question about enabling; is the model set up for an exit point where the person is not going to use the app any more because they’re feeling better? Or is it set up to be quite enmeshed where they feel ‘I’m going to build a relationship with this counselor and they’re going to be able to help me through every problem I’ve got, whenever I want, wherever I want it?’.”
Campbell says psychologists are meant to set goals with clients and when those goals are reached suggest a break from therapy.
BetterHelp’s push into Australia is a two-sided coin, Campbell says. On the one hand, “we have a huge demand for mental health services that needs to be met and the space is there for mental health offerings.”
“The other side of the coin is about the quality and the safety of the service … and that’s my concern about BetterHelp. Because it has a reputation of doing, I would say, quantity over quality.”
Carlton says if people feel let down by the platform there is a risk they won’t seek mental health care in the future.
A spokesperson for BetterHelp said “we are confident in the quality and safety of our offerings.”
The spokesperson said therapists were offered competitive compensation of up to A$137,410 (US$91,700) a year based on 52 working weeks — but actual earnings varied due to conversion rates, caseload and client engagement on the platform.
“Our compensation model is designed to be competitive, and we regularly review it to ensure it meets the needs of our therapists. We also provide extensive support and supervision to maintain high standards of care and therapist satisfaction,” the spokesperson said.
After canceling her BetterHelp subscription, Elizabeth decided to see a private practice therapist via telehealth for one hour every three weeks. She thinks that’s better value and gives her time to reflect and work towards her goals.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS