Uighur advocates have called on western tourism companies to stop selling package holidays that take visitors through Xinjiang, where human rights abuses by authorities have been called a genocide by some governments.
The request comes as China reopens to foreign visitors after the pandemic, and as its leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), calls for more tourism to the region.
A report by the US-based Uighur Human Rights Project (UHRP), released on Wednesday, said western tourism to the region risked supporting the normalization of Chinese government policies that were “intended to destroy the Uyghur identity.”
Photo: AFP
China’s government has been accused of crimes against humanity and abuses including torture through its policies of mass detention, reeducation, surveillance, population control and oppression of religious and cultural expression in the region. It denies all accusations, saying its policies are aimed at countering extremism and alleviating poverty.
“Nothing under current conditions in East Turkistan aligns with travel company and industry commitments to protection and empowerment of local communities,” the group said, using the traditional name of the region and its title as an independent state between 1944 and 1949.
The UHRP report described tour packages by seven travel companies with offices in western countries. Some were advertising tours available for this year and next, while others had not offered any since before the COVID pandemic, during which China was closed to tourists.
Photo: AFP
Most of the package holidays — often marketed as Silk Road tours — stopped in the Xinjiang cities of Turpan, Kashgar and Urumqi, and some provided “problematic” experiences including visits to the Xinjiang Regional Museum, which UHRP said contributed to the “state erasure of Uighur history, culture and identity,” and the Id Kah mosque, which research groups say has been made largely off limits to Uighurs for prayer.
Some tours, including one by Goway Travel, promised participants would “meet with a local Uighur family.” The UHRP said there was “no possibility” that Uyghur families could freely decline such a visit.
“It is perverse that overseas visitors on organized tours should visit Uighur homes when Uighur families cannot host their own family members who live abroad,” it said. “Further, the presence of family outsiders in Uighur homes has been a key tactic in the surveillance and exploitation of Uighurs,” it added, in reference to a 2017 policy of stationing Han Chinese officials in Uighur homes.
Some tours also offered to visit Aksu, where human rights researchers have identified several detention centers.
The author of the report, Henryk Szadziewski, said: “The optics of advertising and organizing tours to the Uighur region amid ongoing crimes against humanity are disastrous.”
Tourism to troubled regions of the world is subject to debate in the sector and among travelers. Some operators and tourists argue that it remains important to support local communities and to provide observation from the outside.
A spokesperson for Intrepid Travel, a global operation that was among the seven examined by UHRP, said it had “had to confront several ethical considerations in destinations all over the world over its 34-year history. Intrepid believes that travel can be a force for good and can help make a positive impact on the communities we visit.”
The spokesperson said Intrepid worked with about 8,000 suppliers around the world and had dedicated teams to ensure ethical supply-chain management. The company updated its human rights policy in February, mandating a global assessment every three years. The next will take place next year.
Robin Ball, the director of the UK-based company Bamboo Travel, which was also listed by UHRP, said it had sent only a handful of people to Turpan, Urumqi and Kashgar in its 17 years of operation, and none in the past five, but it did offer clients the opportunity to visit the Silk Road region.
He added: “Bamboo Travel does not support the Chinese government in their suppression of the Uighur people, and we would never knowingly provide services that would harm or endanger the local population in China’s Xinjiang province.
“While this report may advocate avoiding all travel to Xinjiang, this is not an approach we would currently consider. We strongly believe engagement with troubled areas, and interaction with people living there, is a better approach than isolation and cutting the revenue streams that tourism provides to locals.”
The UHRP said the travel industry had “laudable” ethical standards and internal accountability mechanisms but tours to Xinjiang failed to meet them. It said its findings were not about how travel companies were run generally but about whether companies conduct the due diligence required to meet the industry standards.
Shortly after the Guardian’s inquiries Intrepid and Goway withdrew tour packages that went through Xinjiang, and the Web pages were removed.
“Goway does not endorse any travel experiences that exploit human rights,” said Craig Canvin, the company’s senior vice-president.
He said the local tour operator Goway had worked with had “assured us of high ethical standards and positive community impact.”
Canvin added: “We recognize that this is a complex issue and after careful deliberation, Goway has made the decision to discontinue the sale of this program while we conduct a rigorous audit.”
The UHRP report comes days after Xi made a surprise stop in Urumqi and delivered a speech that called for an increase in domestic and international tourism to Xinjiang. At the same time he urged officials to “more deeply promote the Sinicisation of Islam and effectively control illegal religious activities.”
Rights groups have found that many of the policies targeting “illegal religious activities” have persecuted people for benign acts of observance, including studying the Koran and having a beard.
The UHRP report said visitors to Xinjiang were seeing only a Uighur identity “permitted by the Chinese state.”
It added: “What the Chinese state has left of public expressions of Uighur identity has remained for commodification and exploitation, not only by visitors on tours from overseas but also domestic tourists.”
Taiwan, once relegated to the backwaters of international news media and viewed as a subset topic of “greater China,” is now a hot topic. Words associated with Taiwan include “invasion,” “contingency” and, on the more cheerful side, “semiconductors” and “tourism.” It is worth noting that while Taiwanese companies play important roles in the semiconductor industry, there is no such thing as a “Taiwan semiconductor” or a “Taiwan chip.” If crucial suppliers are included, the supply chain is in the thousands and spans the globe. Both of the variants of the so-called “silicon shield” are pure fantasy. There are four primary drivers
The sprawling port city of Kaohsiung seldom wins plaudits for its beauty or architectural history. That said, like any other metropolis of its size, it does have a number of strange or striking buildings. This article describes a few such curiosities, all but one of which I stumbled across by accident. BOMBPROOF HANGARS Just north of Kaohsiung International Airport, hidden among houses and small apartment buildings that look as though they were built between 15 and 30 years ago, are two mysterious bunker-like structures that date from the airport’s establishment as a Japanese base during World War II. Each is just about
Two years ago my wife and I went to Orchid Island off Taitung for a few days vacation. We were shocked to realize that for what it cost us, we could have done a bike vacation in Borneo for a week or two, or taken another trip to the Philippines. Indeed, most of the places we could have gone for that vacation in neighboring countries offer a much better experience than Taiwan at a much lower price. Hence, the recent news showing that tourist visits to Pingtung County’s Kenting, long in decline, reached a 27 year low this summer came
The female body is a horror movie waiting to happen. From puberty and the grisly onset of menstruation, in pictures such as Brian De Palma’s Carrie and John Fawcett’s Ginger Snaps, to pregnancy and childbirth — Rosemary’s Baby is the obvious example — women have provided a rich seam of inspiration for genre film-makers over the past half century. But look a little closer and two trends become apparent: the vast majority of female body-based horror deals with various aspects of the reproductive system, and it has largely been made by men (Titane and The First Omen, two recent examples
RSS