“Get down to the floor! The party begins!” Shouting in English, Jan-Erik Olsson walked into a Stockholm bank on Aug. 23, 1973, high on drugs, agitated and waving a submachine gun.
So began a hostage drama that would go on to last six days, and birth the term “Stockholm Syndrome” — a concept now known around the world whereby captives develop an emotional bond with their captors.
Olsson, known by his nickname “Janne,” took four employees hostage — three women and one man.
Photo: AFP
Police and media quickly swarmed the square outside Kreditbanken, with snipers perched in surrounding buildings, their weapons pointed at the bank.
Olsson used two hostages as human shields and threatened to kill them.
“Afterwards, I’ve often thought of the absurd situation we found ourselves in,” recalled hostage Kristin Enmark, then 23, in her book I Became the Stockholm Syndrome.
“Terrified and stuck between two death threats, on one side the police and on the other the robber.”
‘FEARED FOR MY LIFE’
Olsson made several demands, asking for three million kronor (almost US$700,000 at the time), and that Clark Olofsson, one of the country’s most notorious bank robbers in prison at the time, be brought to the bank.
To calm things down, the Swedish government agreed. The entire country was mesmerized by the unfolding drama, one of the first major news events broadcast live on Swedish television.
“When Clark Olofsson arrived, he took control of the situation, he was the one who did the talking with the police,” recalled now 73-year-old Bertil Ericsson, a news photographer who covered the crisis.
“He had a lot of charisma. He was a good speaker.” Olsson calmed down as soon as Olofsson arrived. And Kristin Enmark quickly saw in Olofsson a savior.
“He promised that he would make sure nothing happened to me and I decided to believe him,” she wrote. “I was 23 years old and feared for my life.”
She spoke on the phone to authorities several times during the hostage drama, shocking the world when she came out in defense of her captors.
“I’m not the least bit afraid of Clark and the other guy, I’m afraid of the police. Do you understand? I trust them completely,” she told then prime minister Olof Palme in one phone call.
“Believe it or not but we’ve had a really nice time here,” she said, adding that they were “telling stories” and “playing checkers.”
“You know what I’m afraid of? That the police will do something to us, storm the bank or something.”
The crisis ended on the sixth day when police sprayed gas into the bank, forcing Olsson and Olofsson to surrender, and freeing the hostages.
‘NOT A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS’
Psychiatrist Nils Bejerot was a member of the negotiating team. His job was to analyze the robbers’ and hostages’ behavior, and he ultimately coined the term “Stockholm Syndrome.”
At the time, the women were believed to be behaving as if under a spell, similar to being brainwashed.
Psychiatrists have since dismissed that notion.
Stockholm Syndrome is “not a psychiatric diagnosis,” says Christoffer Rahm, a psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute and author of the scientific article “Stockholm Syndrome: Psychiatric Diagnosis or Urban Myth?”
Rather, the term is used to describe a “defence mechanism that helps the victim” cope with a traumatic situation, he said.
Cecilia Ase, gender studies professor at Stockholm University, said the statements by Enmark and the other women during the drama were interpreted by authorities “in a very sexualized dimension, as if they had fallen under the spell of a syndrome” and had lost all agency or ability to reason for themselves.
This perception was fueled by rumors of a relationship between Enmark and Olofsson.
While the two did go on to have a love affair years later, there is nothing to suggest the two had a relationship in the bank vault.
“There was no love or physical attraction from my side. He was my chance for survival and he protected me from Janne,” wrote Enmark, the inspiration for the character “Kicki” in the Netflix series Clark.
Ase argues that Stockholm Syndrome is a “constructed concept” used to explain how hostages behave when authorities and states fail to protect them.
The Stockholm hostages in fact “acted incredibly rationally,” she said.
“They called journalists, they fought (with police and politicians) to let the criminals take them out of the bank.”
“We represented a real threat to the hostages,” acknowledged police superintendent Eric Ronnegard in a book published years later. “With so many police officers surrounding the bank, there was a risk that one of the hostages could take a bullet.”
In a sign of their bitterness toward police, the hostages later refused to testify against their captors. Most people can identify with the concept on a psychological level, Rahm said, noting that emotional bonds with someone posing a threat are also common in abusive relationships.
Understanding a victim’s psychological reaction also helps relieve them of their guilt, he said.
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
You can tell a lot about a generation from the contents of their cool box: nowadays the barbecue ice bucket is likely to be filled with hard seltzers, non-alcoholic beers and fluorescent BuzzBallz — a particular favorite among Gen Z. Two decades ago, it was WKD, Bacardi Breezers and the odd Smirnoff Ice bobbing in a puddle of melted ice. And while nostalgia may have brought back some alcopops, the new wave of ready-to-drink (RTD) options look and taste noticeably different. It is not just the drinks that have changed, but drinking habits too, driven in part by more health-conscious consumers and
RSS