“Get down to the floor! The party begins!” Shouting in English, Jan-Erik Olsson walked into a Stockholm bank on Aug. 23, 1973, high on drugs, agitated and waving a submachine gun.
So began a hostage drama that would go on to last six days, and birth the term “Stockholm Syndrome” — a concept now known around the world whereby captives develop an emotional bond with their captors.
Olsson, known by his nickname “Janne,” took four employees hostage — three women and one man.
Photo: AFP
Police and media quickly swarmed the square outside Kreditbanken, with snipers perched in surrounding buildings, their weapons pointed at the bank.
Olsson used two hostages as human shields and threatened to kill them.
“Afterwards, I’ve often thought of the absurd situation we found ourselves in,” recalled hostage Kristin Enmark, then 23, in her book I Became the Stockholm Syndrome.
“Terrified and stuck between two death threats, on one side the police and on the other the robber.”
‘FEARED FOR MY LIFE’
Olsson made several demands, asking for three million kronor (almost US$700,000 at the time), and that Clark Olofsson, one of the country’s most notorious bank robbers in prison at the time, be brought to the bank.
To calm things down, the Swedish government agreed. The entire country was mesmerized by the unfolding drama, one of the first major news events broadcast live on Swedish television.
“When Clark Olofsson arrived, he took control of the situation, he was the one who did the talking with the police,” recalled now 73-year-old Bertil Ericsson, a news photographer who covered the crisis.
“He had a lot of charisma. He was a good speaker.” Olsson calmed down as soon as Olofsson arrived. And Kristin Enmark quickly saw in Olofsson a savior.
“He promised that he would make sure nothing happened to me and I decided to believe him,” she wrote. “I was 23 years old and feared for my life.”
She spoke on the phone to authorities several times during the hostage drama, shocking the world when she came out in defense of her captors.
“I’m not the least bit afraid of Clark and the other guy, I’m afraid of the police. Do you understand? I trust them completely,” she told then prime minister Olof Palme in one phone call.
“Believe it or not but we’ve had a really nice time here,” she said, adding that they were “telling stories” and “playing checkers.”
“You know what I’m afraid of? That the police will do something to us, storm the bank or something.”
The crisis ended on the sixth day when police sprayed gas into the bank, forcing Olsson and Olofsson to surrender, and freeing the hostages.
‘NOT A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS’
Psychiatrist Nils Bejerot was a member of the negotiating team. His job was to analyze the robbers’ and hostages’ behavior, and he ultimately coined the term “Stockholm Syndrome.”
At the time, the women were believed to be behaving as if under a spell, similar to being brainwashed.
Psychiatrists have since dismissed that notion.
Stockholm Syndrome is “not a psychiatric diagnosis,” says Christoffer Rahm, a psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute and author of the scientific article “Stockholm Syndrome: Psychiatric Diagnosis or Urban Myth?”
Rather, the term is used to describe a “defence mechanism that helps the victim” cope with a traumatic situation, he said.
Cecilia Ase, gender studies professor at Stockholm University, said the statements by Enmark and the other women during the drama were interpreted by authorities “in a very sexualized dimension, as if they had fallen under the spell of a syndrome” and had lost all agency or ability to reason for themselves.
This perception was fueled by rumors of a relationship between Enmark and Olofsson.
While the two did go on to have a love affair years later, there is nothing to suggest the two had a relationship in the bank vault.
“There was no love or physical attraction from my side. He was my chance for survival and he protected me from Janne,” wrote Enmark, the inspiration for the character “Kicki” in the Netflix series Clark.
Ase argues that Stockholm Syndrome is a “constructed concept” used to explain how hostages behave when authorities and states fail to protect them.
The Stockholm hostages in fact “acted incredibly rationally,” she said.
“They called journalists, they fought (with police and politicians) to let the criminals take them out of the bank.”
“We represented a real threat to the hostages,” acknowledged police superintendent Eric Ronnegard in a book published years later. “With so many police officers surrounding the bank, there was a risk that one of the hostages could take a bullet.”
In a sign of their bitterness toward police, the hostages later refused to testify against their captors. Most people can identify with the concept on a psychological level, Rahm said, noting that emotional bonds with someone posing a threat are also common in abusive relationships.
Understanding a victim’s psychological reaction also helps relieve them of their guilt, he said.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS