“Get down to the floor! The party begins!” Shouting in English, Jan-Erik Olsson walked into a Stockholm bank on Aug. 23, 1973, high on drugs, agitated and waving a submachine gun.
So began a hostage drama that would go on to last six days, and birth the term “Stockholm Syndrome” — a concept now known around the world whereby captives develop an emotional bond with their captors.
Olsson, known by his nickname “Janne,” took four employees hostage — three women and one man.
Photo: AFP
Police and media quickly swarmed the square outside Kreditbanken, with snipers perched in surrounding buildings, their weapons pointed at the bank.
Olsson used two hostages as human shields and threatened to kill them.
“Afterwards, I’ve often thought of the absurd situation we found ourselves in,” recalled hostage Kristin Enmark, then 23, in her book I Became the Stockholm Syndrome.
“Terrified and stuck between two death threats, on one side the police and on the other the robber.”
‘FEARED FOR MY LIFE’
Olsson made several demands, asking for three million kronor (almost US$700,000 at the time), and that Clark Olofsson, one of the country’s most notorious bank robbers in prison at the time, be brought to the bank.
To calm things down, the Swedish government agreed. The entire country was mesmerized by the unfolding drama, one of the first major news events broadcast live on Swedish television.
“When Clark Olofsson arrived, he took control of the situation, he was the one who did the talking with the police,” recalled now 73-year-old Bertil Ericsson, a news photographer who covered the crisis.
“He had a lot of charisma. He was a good speaker.” Olsson calmed down as soon as Olofsson arrived. And Kristin Enmark quickly saw in Olofsson a savior.
“He promised that he would make sure nothing happened to me and I decided to believe him,” she wrote. “I was 23 years old and feared for my life.”
She spoke on the phone to authorities several times during the hostage drama, shocking the world when she came out in defense of her captors.
“I’m not the least bit afraid of Clark and the other guy, I’m afraid of the police. Do you understand? I trust them completely,” she told then prime minister Olof Palme in one phone call.
“Believe it or not but we’ve had a really nice time here,” she said, adding that they were “telling stories” and “playing checkers.”
“You know what I’m afraid of? That the police will do something to us, storm the bank or something.”
The crisis ended on the sixth day when police sprayed gas into the bank, forcing Olsson and Olofsson to surrender, and freeing the hostages.
‘NOT A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS’
Psychiatrist Nils Bejerot was a member of the negotiating team. His job was to analyze the robbers’ and hostages’ behavior, and he ultimately coined the term “Stockholm Syndrome.”
At the time, the women were believed to be behaving as if under a spell, similar to being brainwashed.
Psychiatrists have since dismissed that notion.
Stockholm Syndrome is “not a psychiatric diagnosis,” says Christoffer Rahm, a psychiatrist at the Karolinska Institute and author of the scientific article “Stockholm Syndrome: Psychiatric Diagnosis or Urban Myth?”
Rather, the term is used to describe a “defence mechanism that helps the victim” cope with a traumatic situation, he said.
Cecilia Ase, gender studies professor at Stockholm University, said the statements by Enmark and the other women during the drama were interpreted by authorities “in a very sexualized dimension, as if they had fallen under the spell of a syndrome” and had lost all agency or ability to reason for themselves.
This perception was fueled by rumors of a relationship between Enmark and Olofsson.
While the two did go on to have a love affair years later, there is nothing to suggest the two had a relationship in the bank vault.
“There was no love or physical attraction from my side. He was my chance for survival and he protected me from Janne,” wrote Enmark, the inspiration for the character “Kicki” in the Netflix series Clark.
Ase argues that Stockholm Syndrome is a “constructed concept” used to explain how hostages behave when authorities and states fail to protect them.
The Stockholm hostages in fact “acted incredibly rationally,” she said.
“They called journalists, they fought (with police and politicians) to let the criminals take them out of the bank.”
“We represented a real threat to the hostages,” acknowledged police superintendent Eric Ronnegard in a book published years later. “With so many police officers surrounding the bank, there was a risk that one of the hostages could take a bullet.”
In a sign of their bitterness toward police, the hostages later refused to testify against their captors. Most people can identify with the concept on a psychological level, Rahm said, noting that emotional bonds with someone posing a threat are also common in abusive relationships.
Understanding a victim’s psychological reaction also helps relieve them of their guilt, he said.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS