During the 1980s, sex symbol Lu Hsiao-fen (陸小芬) was known for her bold behavior and suggestive performances. But in in Day Off (本日公休), her first film role in 23 years, Liu, 66, plays kind-hearted yet stubborn hairdresser A-Rui, who struggles with social and generational change.
Operating an old-school barber shop from her home, A-Rui has had the same customers for decades.
“You’re in charge of all of our heads,” one quips.
Photo courtesy of Vie Vision Pictures
A-Rui prides herself on knowing exactly what each customer wants without needing to ask, and her shop is also a place for locals to socialize. She personally calls each customer to remind them that it’s time for a haircut, and balks when her daughter A-Ling (Beatrice Fang, 方志友) — also a hairdresser — suggests an automatic scheduling notification app.
This story is based on director Fu Tien-yu’s (傅天余) experiences growing up in her mother’s hair salon. Many of the scenes actually happened, such as the old man who barged into the shop early in the morning to dye his hair black after dreaming of his dead wife scolding him about his appearance, or the teenager who was dragged back to the store by his angry mother after he got a trendy haircut to impress his girlfriend.
With decades of material to draw from, the slices of life in the salon and the way A-Rui runs it are vivid and humorous, providing an intimate peek into these establishments that can still be seen in older neighborhoods, but might not be around for much longer.
Photo courtesy of Vie Vision Pictures
Lu has turned down numerous movie roles over the years, but she says she was especially moved by this script. Having no hairdressing experience, she went through three months of training and also took acting classes to brush up on her skills.
Although Lu portrays A-Rui’s subdued but strong personality with nuance, the other characters in the film are one-dimensional, as if they exist just to highlight certain values. A-Rui’s rejection of modernity and insistence that customer relationships are more important than money is countered by the ambitious A-Ling, who plans to open an NT$100 salon that offers 10-minute, in-and-out services. She cannot believe that her mother is not charging extra to travel all the way to Changhua to cut the hair of a long-time customer who cannot move anymore.
A-Ling’s ex-husband A-Chuan (Fu Meng-po, 傅孟波), a mechanic, is like A-Rui, but he’s nice to a fault and keeps letting customers defer their payments for various reasons, even at one point lending his life savings to a friend in need. He also spends more time with A-Rui than the others — even though he and A-ling are divorced. People are usually more complex than this.
Photo courtesy of Vie Vision Pictures
Like the characters, the story itself is very straightforward and evenly paced, detailing a few transformative months in the family’s ordinary lives. It certainly has a lot of heart and offers a few laughs and tear jerking moments, but the plot and characters often come off as a motivational video for some forgotten past that probably never existed.
The biggest problem is the dialogue, which is too deliberate and moralistic. Cars and haircuts are often used as metaphors for the feelings of the characters, or to foreshadow subsequent events, which came of as unnatural.
The movie is still worth watching for Lu’s portrayal and the detailed depiction of a traditional establishment; it might even be the last time to see Lu on screen as she’s suggested in interviews that she is retiring for good.
The breakwater stretches out to sea from the sprawling Kaohsiung port in southern Taiwan. Normally, it’s crowded with massive tankers ferrying liquefied natural gas from Qatar to be stored in the bulbous white tanks that dot the shoreline. These are not normal times, though, and not a single shipment from Qatar has docked at the Yongan terminal since early March after the Strait of Hormuz was shuttered. The suspension has provided a realistic preview of a potential Chinese blockade, a move that would throttle an economy anchored by the world’s most advanced and power-hungry semiconductor industry. It is a stark reminder of
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s
What government project has expropriated the most land in Taiwan? According to local media reports, it is the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, eating 2,500 hectares of land in its first phase, with more to come. Forty thousand people are expected to be displaced by the project. Naturally that enormous land grab is generating powerful pushback. Last week Chen Chien-ho (陳健和), a local resident of Jhuwei Borough (竹圍) in Taoyuan City’s Dayuan District (大園) filed a petition for constitutional review of the project after losing his case at the Taipei Administrative Court. The Administrative Court found in favor of nine other local landowners, but