TikTok’s latest sensation is a real-time filter called Bold Glamor that sashays right past debates over toxic beauty standards on social media, going all in on giving users a new face.
Quietly released to the app’s more than a billion users, Bold Glamor convincingly blends a user’s real face with an AI-generated ideal of a supermodel, drawing both laughs and alarm.
Millions of posts on TikTok capture the shock at Bold Glamor’s superpowers, with users marveling at their plumped up lips, well-chiseled chin and fluffy eyebrows worthy of a fashionista.
Photo: AFP
“It’s the new onslaught of the ‘beauty myth,’” said Kim Johnson, associate professor of nursing at Middle Georgia State University in the US.
Effects like Bold Glamor “lead to unhealthy behaviors such as excessive dieting, comparison and low self-esteem,” Johnson said.
Filters and effects have been a stalwart of TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat for years, but the latest generation of features like Bold Glamor are supercharged.
“It is not subtle. It is instantaneous. It is powerful,” wrote Gwendolyn Seidman, professor of psychology at Albright College, in Psychology Today.
Those yearning for social approval, like under-pressure teens, “won’t like what they see when they turn the filter off, and that’s the problem,” she added.
‘SO COOL’
But beyond Bold Glamor’s troubling aesthetic, observers are scratching their heads about the technology itself and wondering if the app is an unsung advance in artificial intelligence.
Earlier filters overlayed an effect — like joke lenses on Snapchat — over an onscreen face and were easily discernible with a sudden movement or by waving a hand in front of the image.
“What’s so cool about this is that you can ... take your hand and put it in front of your face and it (continues to look) pretty darn real,” mixed reality artist Luke Hurd explained on TikTok.
And while the technology has been available on powerful computers, real-time video filters are now on smartphones, ready for all.
“This is AI for the masses to alter one’s appearance and that’s what’s catching so many people’s attention,” said Andrew Selepak, a social media professor at the University of Florida.
TikTok declined to discuss the technology behind the app, leaving an air of mystery on how Bold Glamor actually works.
The company did insist that “being true to yourself is celebrated and encouraged” on the site and that effects help empower “self-expression and creativity.”
“We continue to work with expert partners and our community, to help keep TikTok a positive, supportive space for everyone,” TikTok said in a statement.
According to experts, Bold Glamor is using generative AI, following the same idea behind ChatGPT or Dall-E, apps that can churn out poems or art and designs on demand almost instantaneously.
Petr Somol, the AI research director at Gen, a tech security firm, said these type of filters have existed for a couple of years, but TikTok’s latest version is “pretty fine-tuned and well done.”
Crucially, if Bold Glamor were indeed generative AI’s latest iteration, it would mean that the filter depends on goldmines of data to deliver its increasingly perfect effects.
This dependency on big data comes as the Chinese-owned firm is under intense scrutiny by the US and other Western governments that fear the company’s ties to communist authorities in Beijing.
“The question is whether TikTok is really concerned with the implications of this new shiny thing,” said Selepak.
PATH TO ‘DEEP FAKE’
Catfishing, scams, deep fakes: some wonder whether state-of-the-art filters are pointing to a world where the ability to misuse the technology is now at the fingertips of anyone with a smartphone.
The latest filters “are not necessarily a deep fake technology as such, but there is a relatively straightforward path extending in that direction,” said Somol.
Siwei Lyu, professor of computer science at the State University of New York at Buffalo, said it was unlikely that the major platforms like TikTok or Meta-owned Instagram would knowingly provide dangerous tools.
But “what makes them more dangerous is people who understand the technology could change it to help users evade being identified online,” opening new avenues for misuse, he added.
May 11 to May 18 The original Taichung Railway Station was long thought to have been completely razed. Opening on May 15, 1905, the one-story wooden structure soon outgrew its purpose and was replaced in 1917 by a grandiose, Western-style station. During construction on the third-generation station in 2017, workers discovered the service pit for the original station’s locomotive depot. A year later, a small wooden building on site was determined by historians to be the first stationmaster’s office, built around 1908. With these findings, the Taichung Railway Station Cultural Park now boasts that it has
Wooden houses wedged between concrete, crumbling brick facades with roofs gaping to the sky, and tiled art deco buildings down narrow alleyways: Taichung Central District’s (中區) aging architecture reveals both the allure and reality of the old downtown. From Indigenous settlement to capital under Qing Dynasty rule through to Japanese colonization, Taichung’s Central District holds a long and layered history. The bygone beauty of its streets once earned it the nickname “Little Kyoto.” Since the late eighties, however, the shifting of economic and government centers westward signaled a gradual decline in the area’s evolving fortunes. With the regeneration of the once
The latest Formosa poll released at the end of last month shows confidence in President William Lai (賴清德) plunged 8.1 percent, while satisfaction with the Lai administration fared worse with a drop of 8.5 percent. Those lacking confidence in Lai jumped by 6 percent and dissatisfaction in his administration spiked up 6.7 percent. Confidence in Lai is still strong at 48.6 percent, compared to 43 percent lacking confidence — but this is his worst result overall since he took office. For the first time, dissatisfaction with his administration surpassed satisfaction, 47.3 to 47.1 percent. Though statistically a tie, for most
In February of this year the Taipei Times reported on the visit of Lienchiang County Commissioner Wang Chung-ming (王忠銘) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and a delegation to a lantern festival in Fuzhou’s Mawei District in Fujian Province. “Today, Mawei and Matsu jointly marked the lantern festival,” Wang was quoted as saying, adding that both sides “being of one people,” is a cause for joy. Wang was passing around a common claim of officials of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the PRC’s allies and supporters in Taiwan — KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party — and elsewhere: Taiwan and
RSS