A recording of Paiwan singers from Sinevaudjan Village echoes through the exhibition room, the lyrics looking back at the hardships their ancestors suffered to give them the life they have today. Nearly 150 years ago, the village was wiped off the map by the Japanese during the Mudan Incident (牡丹社事件), and it took 36 years for the people to return and rebuild it.
Due to a misunderstanding caused by language and cultural barriers, the ancestors of these singers — along with those from neighboring Kukus — killed 54 shipwrecked Ryukyuan sailors who had accidentally wandered into their territory in 1871. Their actions triggered a Japanese punitive expedition three years later that alarmed the Qing Dynasty, who long-treated Taiwan as a remote backwater that wasn’t worth investing in.
It was a pivotal moment in East Asian history. The Qing started paying more attention to governing and defending Taiwan, while Japan annexed the Kingdom of Ryukyu, its first move in what would be decades of imperial expansion.
Photo: Han Cheung, Taipei Times
Both Paiwan villages were burnt down, and for more than a century, the events were told exclusively from Japanese, Chinese and Western perspectives. Over the past 20 years, experts and locals have been reconstructing a new historical interpretation with the Paiwan as the main subjects. Earlier this month, Mudan Township unveiled new statues of Paiwan leader Aruqu Kavulungan and his son, who were killed in the incident but left out of the conventional narrative.
This display in Huashan 1914 Creative Park is a teaser for later next month’s Listening to Mudan: Formosa Incident of 1874 (聆聽牡丹的聲音) audiovisual exhibition that literally returns the voice to the Paiwan on their traditional land in Pingtung County. The Huashan exhibition closes on June 8, and the Pingtung event opens on June 24.
The Mudan Incident is often connected to the Rover Incident of 1867, which happened further to the south and was also triggered by Paiwan warriors killing shipwrecked foreigners — in this case Americans.
Photo: Han Cheung, Taipei Times
This story was recently dramatized into last year’s hit mini-series Seqalu, drawing much public interest to the history of this area. The research that led to this exhibition is the result of the International Conference on Encounters between Southern Formosa and World, which was held in November 2019, and two years of field research into both incidents by Story Studio (故事).
The Taipei display offers an atmospheric general overview of the events in Chinese and English, but in Pingtung visitors can listen to recordings of Kukus and Sinevaudjan descendants telling their accounts of the incident, which have been passed on orally through the generations, in the Paiwan language and tradition. This is symbolic because the original dispute was caused by cultural and linguistic differences, and most visitors will have to rely on the translations to understand it.
The Pingtung show will also provide transportation and possible tours to several historic sites related to the incident, including one of the main battlefields that can be explored through riverside trails restored earlier this year. Also on the list are the graves of the 54 Ryukuan victims and a memorial to the incident erected by the Japanese in 1935. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) scratched off the memorial’s text after World War II, and it was only restored in 2020.
Photo: Han Cheung, Taipei Times
More details will be announced later next month.
Under pressure, President William Lai (賴清德) has enacted his first cabinet reshuffle. Whether it will be enough to staunch the bleeding remains to be seen. Cabinet members in the Executive Yuan almost always end up as sacrificial lambs, especially those appointed early in a president’s term. When presidents are under pressure, the cabinet is reshuffled. This is not unique to any party or president; this is the custom. This is the case in many democracies, especially parliamentary ones. In Taiwan, constitutionally the president presides over the heads of the five branches of government, each of which is confusingly translated as “president”
Sept. 1 to Sept. 7 In 1899, Kozaburo Hirai became the first documented Japanese to wed a Taiwanese under colonial rule. The soldier was partly motivated by the government’s policy of assimilating the Taiwanese population through intermarriage. While his friends and family disapproved and even mocked him, the marriage endured. By 1930, when his story appeared in Tales of Virtuous Deeds in Taiwan, Hirai had settled in his wife’s rural Changhua hometown, farming the land and integrating into local society. Similarly, Aiko Fujii, who married into the prominent Wufeng Lin Family (霧峰林家) in 1927, quickly learned Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) and
The low voter turnout for the referendum on Aug. 23 shows that many Taiwanese are apathetic about nuclear energy, but there are long-term energy stakes involved that the public needs to grasp Taiwan faces an energy trilemma: soaring AI-driven demand, pressure to cut carbon and reliance on fragile fuel imports. But the nuclear referendum on Aug. 23 showed how little this registered with voters, many of whom neither see the long game nor grasp the stakes. Volunteer referendum worker Vivian Chen (陳薇安) put it bluntly: “I’ve seen many people asking what they’re voting for when they arrive to vote. They cast their vote without even doing any research.” Imagine Taiwanese voters invited to a poker table. The bet looked simple — yes or no — yet most never showed. More than two-thirds of those
In the run-up to the referendum on re-opening Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant last month, the media inundated us with explainers. A favorite factoid of the international media, endlessly recycled, was that Taiwan has no energy reserves for a blockade, thus necessitating re-opening the nuclear plants. As presented by the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine, it runs: “According to the US Department of Commerce International Trade Administration, 97.73 percent of Taiwan’s energy is imported, and estimates are that Taiwan has only 11 days of reserves available in the event of a blockade.” This factoid is not an outright lie — that