Of the various renewable energy sources that Taiwan has embraced in recent years, none is more important than solar. The government aims to install 20 GW of photovoltaic (PV) capacity by 2025, triple the target for wind energy and all other renewables combined. If achieved, that will represent more than a third of Taiwan’s power-generating capacity.
Once they’ve been manufactured and installed, solar cells convert sunlight into electricity without producing carbon emissions. Nor do they cause air, water or noise pollution.
There’s just one problem. Like conventional power plants, PV modules don’t last forever. While it’s true that some arrays set up in other countries in the early 1980s are still going strong, solar-energy systems in Taiwan are exposed to typhoons and tremors, as well as strong ultraviolet light that causes the cells themselves to degrade.
Photo courtesy of Chaojhou Township Administrative Office
It’s unclear how long the PV systems installed across Taiwan in recent years are likely to function. However, industry sources, researchers and authorities predict that most PV modules will be decommissioned within 25 years of connection to the grid. According to the Web site of the Circular Taiwan Network — an NGO which names climate change, dependence on imported resources and pollution as major threats facing the country — this means that Taiwan will produce at least 1.4 million tonnes of discarded solar panels by 2050.
In theory, the country’s waste-processing systems can handle such quantities. But old panels aren’t suitable for incineration, and dumping them in landfills raises the risk of metals like cadmium, copper, lead and selenium leaching into the soil. A literature review by Indian researchers, published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews in March 2020, concluded that not enough attention has been paid to the possibility that carcinogenic pollutants might be released if modules aren’t properly disassembled.
Furthermore, if the materials inside old solar panels can be reclaimed and turned into new solar panels, the lifetime carbon emissions of new panels will be much lower.
Photo courtesy of ITRI
On Nov. 8, 2018, the Liberty Times (Chinese-language sister paper of the Taipei Times) reported that local government employees were removing 800-odd typhoon-damaged solar panels that had been dumped beside a fish farm in Changhua County’s Dacheng Township (大城). The authorities were also trying to identify the individual or company responsible, as improper disposal of industrial waste can result in a fine of up to NT$3 million.
A typical PV panel weighs around 18kg, three quarters of which is glass. The aluminum frame is at least 10 percent of the weight, while the solar cells themselves — made of monocrystalline, polycrystalline, or thin-film silicon wafers from 0.1mm to 0.5mm thick — represent less than 4 percent. Plastics account for most of the rest.
Since Feb. 2019, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) has been working with the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Bureau of Energy to collect a one-off recycling fee for PV modules of NT$1,000 per KW capacity, payable when the panels are sold.
Photo: Chen Kuan-pei, Taipei Times
Like the EPA-administered fund that supports the PET/PP recycling ecosystem, this money is being used to subsidize the collection and processing of solar panels. It’s official recognition that, even though almost every part of an unwanted PV system can be recycled — the aluminum frame and copper conductive tape in each panel, as well as the silver glue and lead-tin solder that adhere to the tape, for instance, can be turned into easy-to-sell commodities — the value of retrievable materials isn’t enough to cover the cost of separating them.
Moreover, current disposal procedures are far from ideal. An EPA Web page about solar-panel recycling from August last year says that the two local facilities licensed to deal with waste PV modules, “mainly use a mechanical process to crush the panels and then send the fragments to Japan to be used as slagging agents in copper smelters.”
Taiwan has one of the world’s highest glass recycling rates, but crushing panels results in low-purity glass pellets. Glass sheets that can be removed intact are more valuable — and this is something Taiwan’s Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) has included in its efforts to redesign PV modules so that recycling them is easier.
Photo courtesy of UJGIGA
ITRI scientists also claim to have discovered a manufacturing technique that could greatly increase the rate at which silicon wafers are reclaimed intact from old panels.
Successfully retrieving wafers has long been difficult, because solar-panel makers use ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) or polyolefin (PO) to encase solar cells.
As ITRI’s Liu Yi-chun (劉怡君) explained in September last year during an international Webinar on PV panels (“Approaching to Green More: Easy-Dismantled PV Module”), when pyrolysis (heating at high temperatures) is applied to melt a panel’s already-dismantled backpane, bubbles appear in the EVA/PO. There’s no way for these bubbles to escape, so they end up rupturing the wafers.
ITRI researchers have found that, by adding an extra layer of thermoplastic elastomer plastic (TPE) around the solar cells, they can avoid this problem.
According to Liu, pyrolysis and chemically processing one of ITRI’s easy-to-recycle PV modules generates lower carbon emissions than crushing and sorting a standard commercial PV panel. What’s more, she stressed, the former approach produces reclaimed materials of far greater value.
Recycled silicon wafers that can be reused by PV-module manufacturers would be an especially significant step toward a greener circular economy. According to the ITRI Web page for the September event, virgin silicon wafers are refined from silicon ore and undergo complex manufacturing processes, so their environmental impact is considerable. The carbon footprint of recycled wafers, by contrast, is just 17 percent of that of virgin silicon wafers.
Unfortunately, it’s doesn’t seem likely that modules optimized for dismantling and recycling will be mass-produced in the near future.
Asked if any manufacturers plan to bring easy-to-recycle PV modules that incorporate ITRI’s innovations to market anytime soon, the institute said those technologies will be made available once trials have been completed.
The Taipei Times reached out to four Taiwan-based makers of PV equipment, asking if they intend to revise the design of their modules, so as to make recycling them easier. None of the companies responded.
Fortunately, other local scientists are working to enhance recycling processes for PV modules as they’re currently configured.
A research group led by Fu Yaw-shyan (傅耀賢), a professor in National University of Tainan’s Department of Greenergy Technology, began by using chemical decomposition to separate the various materials within each panel. This method was effective, but Fu’s team decided not to pursue it, because the solvents used are unkind to the environment.
They then looked in physical separating the different layers within a module by planing. Initially, the heat generated by this process caused the adhesives within the test panels to soften, gumming up the machinery. Fortunately, Taiwan is a global leader in precision machining. By drawing on expertise in the private sector, Fu’s team were able to solve this problem.
Unlike ITRI’s design innovations, the system Fu and his colleagues are endeavoring to refine doesn’t result in glass sheets ready for reuse or intact silicon wafers. On the plus side, by avoiding pyrolysis, it shouldn’t yield compounds which, if handled improperly, might harm human or environmental health.
According to a report in July last year in Taiwan Panorama, Fu’s team believe their PV-module recycling system can be fully automated and fitted inside a 40-foot cargo container. By opening the door to worldwide deployment, this advance could be a significant victory in the war against e-waste.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
On April 26, The Lancet published a letter from two doctors at Taichung-based China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) warning that “Taiwan’s Health Care System is on the Brink of Collapse.” The authors said that “Years of policy inaction and mismanagement of resources have led to the National Health Insurance system operating under unsustainable conditions.” The pushback was immediate. Errors in the paper were quickly identified and publicized, to discredit the authors (the hospital apologized). CNA reported that CMUH said the letter described Taiwan in 2021 as having 62 nurses per 10,000 people, when the correct number was 78 nurses per 10,000
May 5 to May 11 What started out as friction between Taiwanese students at Taichung First High School and a Japanese head cook escalated dramatically over the first two weeks of May 1927. It began on April 30 when the cook’s wife knew that lotus starch used in that night’s dinner had rat feces in it, but failed to inform staff until the meal was already prepared. The students believed that her silence was intentional, and filed a complaint. The school’s Japanese administrators sided with the cook’s family, dismissing the students as troublemakers and clamping down on their freedoms — with
As Donald Trump’s executive order in March led to the shuttering of Voice of America (VOA) — the global broadcaster whose roots date back to the fight against Nazi propaganda — he quickly attracted support from figures not used to aligning themselves with any US administration. Trump had ordered the US Agency for Global Media, the federal agency that funds VOA and other groups promoting independent journalism overseas, to be “eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.” The decision suddenly halted programming in 49 languages to more than 425 million people. In Moscow, Margarita Simonyan, the hardline editor-in-chief of the
Six weeks before I embarked on a research mission in Kyoto, I was sitting alone at a bar counter in Melbourne. Next to me, a woman was bragging loudly to a friend: She, too, was heading to Kyoto, I quickly discerned. Except her trip was in four months. And she’d just pulled an all-nighter booking restaurant reservations. As I snooped on the conversation, I broke out in a sweat, panicking because I’d yet to secure a single table. Then I remembered: Eating well in Japan is absolutely not something to lose sleep over. It’s true that the best-known institutions book up faster
RSS