The government released its latest population data for the Beautiful Island last week, and the numbers augur ill. Taiwan continues to age at an alarming rate.
For the first time in its history, the working age population between 15 and 64 fell from census to census, declining 169,000 to 16.54 million. The number of people over 65 in Taiwan is now at 3.67 million, nearly 16 percent of the population.
The population is also falling, some of that due to people overseas having their household registrations canceled after being gone for more than two years due to COVID. According to the government, roughly 20,000 more people left Taiwan than entered it in September.
Photo: EPA-EFE
There is no happy trend anywhere in these numbers.
AGING IN TAIWAN
Articles on aging tend to focus on its effects on the health care system, but our growing elderly are going to transform every aspect of society.
Photo: Reuters
Elder care costs go far beyond medical care. They also need specialized infrastructure, transportation services and in-home care. In Taiwan a decade ago, the proportion of children living with elderly parents was higher than in China, South Korea or Japan. Could this subsidize the need for increased social welfare expenditures on the aged?
Among economists it is widely believed that such care declines as social welfare policies substitute for care by children. However, as Lin Ju-ping (林如萍) and Yi Chin-chun (伊慶春) noted in a recent paper, sociologists disagree, finding that irrespective of the welfare system, once factors such as health and partnership status are controlled for, human societies are largely similar in this regard.
Don’t expect the younger generations, already overburdened with longer working hours at low pay, to step up. They can’t.
Indeed, for decades in the relationship between the aged and their young the relationship has often run the other way: the young with few siblings tap the old for money.
“During the past decade, the percentage of ‘dependent’ intergenerational interactions has been on the rise,” Lin and Yi observe.
In addition to the medical and social costs, the growing population of the elderly will affect defense arrangements. A 2018 American Enterprise Institute (AEI) report, “Taiwan’s demographic crunch and its military implications” noted several issues facing the nation.
The AEI observed that it will be difficult for the military to find enough warm bodies to fill the ranks, especially since manufacturing and agriculture will need people to maintain production.
More deeply, military budgets will face increasing pressure as the growing senior population demands more services, AEI pointed out. This problem will become more acute as Taiwan has to substitute expensive high-tech systems such as autonomous drones and robots for the declining supply of cheap warm bodies.
Consider also: in last year’s presidential election Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) support was strongest in the 50-59 age bracket, an age cohort that will soon be hitting retirement. That will be the last cohort of the Taiwan Miracle, weaned on KMT propaganda and browbeaten in the concentration camps that the KMT set up for Taiwan’s young males, which were euphemistically known as military bases.
It will likely live another 20 years beyond that, distorting local politics and beggaring local governments with its need for care services and pension payouts. It will be two more decades before people who came of age under democracy begin retiring.
What kind of policies will the Han voters support? Obviously, though not everyone in it voted for Han, that cohort will likely be more conservative than the population at large.
Thus, in policies for climate, economic inequality, immigration and labor, Taiwan may well present the grim picture of a society growing more conservative with time even as the changes it requires to survive grow more radical.
The invariable answer to this expanding list of problems, as many have noted over the years (including this writer), is immigration. That might work, if immigrants had different birth rates than people born here, but a quick glance at the fertility patterns of “foreign brides” shows that they mirror those of women born here.
Suppose we gave every migrant worker here citizenship in a blanket law. Would they all pump out four kids? Not a chance: many of them already have kids (which is why they are working overseas) and will not have many more. We’d have a nifty bump in the labor force, followed in 20 years by an awkward bump in the aged population, still without the extra children to care for them.
STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS
The real problem is structural: except for medical care and personal safety, Taiwan is a terrible place to raise kids. The schools are brutal. After junior high school begins, students have little time to grow into themselves and find out who they are. Because students are expected to study (and only study) organized activities for teenagers hardly exist. Bullying is common.
But that is only the beginning. Houses are cramped. Roads are crowded. Parks are overrun with people on the weekend. Green space is at a premium in urban areas.
Exhausted from long working hours, parents spend less time with kids. Parental leave is largely a legal fiction, especially for fathers. Yet work pays so poorly that children are a huge financial burden.
The list goes on and on.
The government can move on immigration, but that won’t address the real issues. Indeed, at some point, because of pressure from the foreign community, and because boosting immigration can give the appearance of addressing the problem without the reality of hard choices, I expect the government to loosen its border controls.
But until our government and our society decide that children are more than biological vehicles intended to maintain the family name and status, fill places in industry and care for the next generation, Taiwan will continue to face population decline.
Not with a bang, but with the whine of pampered elderly will we fade out.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
May 18 to May 24 Pastor Yang Hsu’s (楊煦) congregation was shocked upon seeing the land he chose to build his orphanage. It was surrounded by mountains on three sides, and the only way to access it was to cross a river by foot. The soil was poor due to runoff, and large rocks strewn across the plot prevented much from growing. In addition, there was no running water or electricity. But it was all Yang could afford. He and his Indigenous Atayal wife Lin Feng-ying (林鳳英) had already been caring for 24 orphans in their home, and they were in
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday delivered an address marking the first anniversary of his presidency. In the speech, Lai affirmed Taiwan’s global role in technology, trade and security. He announced economic and national security initiatives, and emphasized democratic values and cross-party cooperation. The following is the full text of his speech: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽), there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
As with most of northern Thailand’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) settlements, the village of Arunothai was only given a Thai name once the Thai government began in the 1970s to assert control over the border region and initiate a decades-long process of political integration. The village’s original name, bestowed by its Yunnanese founders when they first settled the valley in the late 1960s, was a Chinese name, Dagudi (大谷地), which literally translates as “a place for threshing rice.” At that time, these village founders did not know how permanent their settlement would be. Most of Arunothai’s first generation were soldiers
RSS