If concrete were a country, it would be the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases on Earth, behind only China and the US.
How can this material, essential for global housing, construction and infrastructure, be made less damaging to the planet?
Cement is the most utilized material on Earth, consumed to make concrete at a rate of some 150 tonnes each second.
Photo: AFP
According to the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), around 14 billion cubic meters of concrete are cast each year.
Cement production alone accounts for as much as seven percent of global CO2 emissions — three times the emissions produced by aviation.
“That’s more than all the emissions from the European Union or India, just behind those of China and the US,” Valerie Masson-Delmotte, a key contributor to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said. And with ever-growing urbanization rates in Africa and Asia, the planetary impact of this elementary building material is only likely to grow.
Photo: Bloomberg
Cement is the main binder that holds together the pebbles and stones in concrete. It is primarily made of clinker, a residue produced by firing clay and limestone in a furnace. When it is heated, CO2 is produced.
In order to manufacture one tonne of cement, the process of firing to 1,400 degrees Celsius produces roughly one tonne of CO2.
This chemical reaction, which has stayed unaltered since cement was first manufactured over 200 years ago, is responsible for 70 percent of the sector’s emissions.
Photo: REUTERS
The remaining 30 percent comes from the energy used to fire the furnaces themselves.
REDUCING EMISSIONS?
The concrete industry has said it wants to be carbon neutral by 2050. In October it set the objective of reducing its emissions “an additional 25 percent” by 2030.
This would save some five billion tonnes of CO2 over the course of the decade. Purging the sector of CO2 emissions is heavily reliant on technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCUS) which have yet to be deployed at any meaningful scale. But it also proposes changes such as recycling old concrete and replacing hydrocarbons in its blast furnaces with biofuels.
State-run behemoths such as the China National Building Material Company have promised to “play their part” in the industry’s decarbonization.
At the other end of the scale, several start-ups are coming up with new ways to save emissions.
US-based Solidia plans to capture CO2 and use it to dry out the concrete mix, minimizing the amount of water needed in production. In Canada, CarbonCure is exploring how to inject liquified CO2 into concrete and store it there.
‘GREEN CEMENT’
Perhaps most importantly, the industry is banking on developing new “green” cements, made from recycled materials.
In Britain, 26 percent of concrete is already manufactured in this way, according to the GCCA.
In May, France, which is home to several major concrete firms, issued new cement production regulations.
Starting next year, all new buildings will be subject to carbon restrictions for the duration of their lives, from construction to demolition.
As things stand, most green cements are being made by new producers; traditional manufacturers say it will take time for them to modernize their existing machinery.
One such start up, Hoffman Green Cement, makes cement in France from industrial waste: clay sludge, blast furnace slag and fly ash, which is a by-product from coal burning.
Even with a price tag 25 euros (US$29) more expensive per square metre, demand is high, says founder Julien Blanchard.
“The cement industry plans to eliminate its emissions in 2050,” he said. “With our breakthrough solutions, we can get them starting now.”
The stakes for the planet are high: the UN estimates that three quarters of the world’s infrastructure by 2050 has yet to be built.
The breakwater stretches out to sea from the sprawling Kaohsiung port in southern Taiwan. Normally, it’s crowded with massive tankers ferrying liquefied natural gas from Qatar to be stored in the bulbous white tanks that dot the shoreline. These are not normal times, though, and not a single shipment from Qatar has docked at the Yongan terminal since early March after the Strait of Hormuz was shuttered. The suspension has provided a realistic preview of a potential Chinese blockade, a move that would throttle an economy anchored by the world’s most advanced and power-hungry semiconductor industry. It is a stark reminder of
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
The last couple of weeks spectators in Taiwan and abroad have been treated to a remarkable display of infighting in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the supplementary defense budget. The party has split into two camps, one supporting an NT$800 billion special defense budget and one supporting an NT$380 billion budget with additional funding contingent on receiving letters of acceptance (LOA) from the US. Recent media reports have said that the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is leaning toward the latter position. President William Lai (賴清德) has proposed NT$1.25 trillion for purchases of US arms and for development of domestic weapons
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s