Writers and critics are raising questions over the role that agents and estates play in managing archives and limiting access to biographical material.
Fresh worries have been fueled by the continuing fiasco over the publication of Philip Roth: The Biography, with accusations that access to the famed US author’s archival material is being unfairly constrained.
A month ago, the book was destined to be the literary biography of the year — a “narrative masterwork,” according to the New York Times. Then, the book’s US publisher, WW Norton, “paused” distribution after Roth’s hand-picked biographer, Blake Bailey, who has denied any wrongdoing, was accused of sexual misconduct. Last week it withdrew the book entirely, and it was subsequently picked up by Skyhorse.
Photo: Reuters
Roth’s literary agent, Andrew Wylie of the Wylie Agency, and Julia Golier, a lover of Roth and later a close friend, are interpreted to be under Roth’s direction to destroy archival material after it was seen by Bailey. Princeton University’s library gave Bailey access to material that is not currently available. A university spokesperson said the library was in “ongoing discussions with Roth representatives regarding the collection.” The Wylie Agency did not return a request for comment.
Stephen Enniss, director of the Harry Ransom Center in Austin, Texas, one of the largest and best-funded literary archives, says that agents are taking a more assertive role in authors’ estates and archives, which does not necessarily comport with an archivist’s code of ethics.
“You’ve got agents like Andrew Wylie who increasingly represent authors in the sale of their archives. Their role in trying to broker ever higher deals has been a destructive thing within the circulation and preservation of archives,” Enniss says.
Photo: AFP
For the moment, the Roth biography debacle is a cautionary tale of what can go wrong when posthumous reputations are gamed from beyond the grave.
Last week, the Philip Roth Society issued a statement saying that “limiting access to one biographer run counter to conventions of academic inquiry.”
Society member Jacques Berlinerblau, author of the forthcoming unauthorised The Philip Roth We Don’t Know: Sex, Race and Autobiography, told the Observer: “Darkness is never the proper condition for scholarly work, and in this case the glance has been cast back to the interpreter.
“It’s irresponsible, given how Roth trafficked in reality and fiction, to have just one person look at it. We have conflicts of interest galore, an absence of critical distance, and we don’t know the man any better.”
Enniss points out that special access comes with its own challenges to integrity.
“It always has that double edge to it: the biographer benefits from that access but there’s potentially something damaging in that access in terms of spoken or unspoken understanding about what’s fair to be addressed,” he said.
Critic and author Francine Prose says we might also be better off acknowledging the origins of Roth’s autofiction.
“It’s a complicated situation that got oversimplified in crass and vulgar ways by the unfolding story,” Prose told the Observer.
“Do we pretend these attitudes don’t exist or give Roth credit for reporting on it in such a meticulous and painfully honest way? But to find a biographer to say this is really OK is to shut off that whole conversation.”
While Roth may have had reason to want to control the narrative of his life from beyond the grave, his efforts are hardly unique.
“It’s not difficult for an author to ensure contentious material isn’t available,” author William Boyd said, pointing to TS Eliot’s embargo on his love letters, or Philip Larkin’s instructions to his girlfriend Monica Jones to destroy his diaries.
“If you’re interested in your posthumous reputation then you can curate it. But it’s a highly complex, compromised exercise and unless it’s designed to protect the living, it tends to be counter-productive,” Boyd says.
John le Carre, VS Naipaul, Graham Greene and Muriel Spark each commissioned biographies in their lifetimes with mixed results. Boyd points out that Patrick French’s biography of Naipaul revealed “what a devastatingly unpleasant person he was,” and Le Carre was “deeply upset” by his.
“You’d think, why commission it if you’re going to be upset by what it says? It’s a highly complex, compromised exercise,” Boyd points out. “Le Carre and Spark employed dull academics who’d write something very boring to keep everybody else away.”
For his part, Boyd says he’s not so interested in his posthumous reputation.
“I believe the Stoics who said posterity is not our business. While I’m alive, of course, I am. When I’ve fallen off the perch it won’t matter.”
But a subject’s efforts — and by extension his or her representatives and heirs — to try to guide the writer’s hand, at least from this side of the grave, is to be expected, says James Fox, journalist and writer, co-author of the autobiographies of Keith Richards, David Bailey and, yet to be published, Damien Hirst.
“If you get into the area of family biography, there’s always somebody complaining about it, somebody withholding letters and so on,” says Fox. “Everybody feels they possess this character and they don’t want anyone else giving their own version of it because then they feel abandoned and don’t feel special.”
Questions underlying Roth’s biography revolve around efforts to orchestrate posterity. Robert McCrum, former literary editor at the Observer, recalls an interview he conducted with Roth, who died in 2018, in which the author made it clear he expected in death, as in life, to exert narrative control.
“In old age Roth became monstrous with his own sense of grandeur. He’d always been a tremendous control-freak, and it’s one of the fallacies that crops up in the world of books that writers think they can control their literary afterlives, which of course they can’t.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
By far the most jarring of the new appointments for the incoming administration is that of Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) to head the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF). That is a huge demotion for one of the most powerful figures in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Tseng has one of the most impressive resumes in the party. He was very active during the Wild Lily Movement and his generation is now the one taking power. He has served in many of the requisite government, party and elected positions to build out a solid political profile. Elected as mayor of Taoyuan as part of the
Moritz Mieg, 22, lay face down in the rubble, the ground shaking violently beneath him. Boulders crashed down around him, some stones hitting his back. “I just hoped that it would be one big hit and over, because I did not want to be hit nearly to death and then have to slowly die,” the student from Germany tells Taipei Times. MORNING WALK Early on April 3, Mieg set out on a scenic hike through Taroko Gorge in Hualien County (花蓮). It was a fine day for it. Little did he know that the complex intersection of tectonic plates Taiwan sits
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50