The challenge came over a mug of coffee. If I was serious about reducing my environmental impact, a friend teased, I should be putting soy milk, not cow’s milk, in my drink.
Back in February 2016, EcoWatch.com told its readers that cow’s milk represents “60 to 70 percent of the carbon footprint of a cup of coffee with a few tablespoons of milk.”
For a latte, the article said, “it’s more like 80 or 90 percent.”
Photo: Yang Yuan-ting, Taipei Times
My response to my friend ran to two words: “Food miles.” Most of the soy consumed in Taiwan is grown on the other side of the Pacific, I pointed out, whereas almost all of the cow’s milk sold in fluid form in Taiwan’s supermarkets comes from local dairy herds.
“But what do those cows eat, and where does it come from?” he asked.
We both knew the answer. Dairy cows don’t, as some people imagine, subsist on grass. Instead, the 20 to 25kg of food each animal consumes per day comprises roughly equal quantities of forage (grass, hay and silage) and grains (usually corn and soy). Food-processing by-products like cottonseeds, citrus pulp, almond hulls and soy hulls are often added, as are spent grains from breweries.
Photo: Steven Crook
TAIWAN’S DAIRY FOOTPRINT
Just how much of the diet of Taiwanese cattle is imported may surprise you. According to the 2019 Taiwan Grain and Feed Annual, published by the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, locally grown corn accounted for less 2 percent of all corn consumed in Taiwan the previous year. Nine-tenths of the corn shipped that year to Taiwan (the US and Brazil are the no. 1 and no. 2 suppliers) was fed to poultry and swine.
For soy, Taiwan is even more dependent on imports. Notwithstanding the government’s efforts to boost local soy production (to help solve the problem of rice overproduction, rather than reduce imports), Taiwanese farmers aren’t close to meeting half of 1 percent of domestic demand.
Photo: Wu Cheng-ting, Taipei Times
Because Taiwan is so densely populated, cows here don’t get to do much grazing. Taiwan is one of the top six importers of US hay, and also buys considerable amounts from Australia.
Environmentalists point to other problems associated with cattle farming. Depending on the animal’s size and what it eats, a domesticated bovine may belch 100kg of methane into the atmosphere per year. While methane isn’t as persistent as carbon dioxide, atom for atom it’s a far more potent cause of global warming.
Dairy production consumes a lot of electricity, and not just to refrigerate the milk. Holsteins were bred for conditions in Europe and North America, so dairy farms in Taiwan have to be equipped with heat abatement systems such as enormous fans.
According to the Web site of the Dairy Association of the Republic of China, each lactating cow produces an average (and impressive) 7,000 liters of milk per year. It would therefore be shocking if the animals didn’t drink a huge amount of water, on top of the huge input of food.
I’ve not been able to find Taiwan specific figures, but a Michigan State University Web page says a milking cow typically consumes 113 to 189 liters of water each day, and — this is very relevant to Taiwan — “During periods of heat stress, water intake may double.”
In other words, a farmer must provide each cow with at least six liters of water for every liter of milk he gets. For a country that often suffers water shortages, this looks like a bad deal. To be fair, if you’ve spent any time around cattle, you may have noticed that they urinate frequently and in quantity; at least some of the water goes right back into the land. Also, many of Taiwan’s 550-odd dairy farms are located in the eastern countries of Hualien and Taitung, where the water issue isn’t so acute.
But if you take into account the water needed to grow and transport what’s fed to the cow, and to package the milk, it becomes clear that the industry consumes a massive amount of water.
A 2011 report published by UNESCO’s Institute for Water Education concluded that the per liter water footprint of cow’s milk varied from 540 liters (in the case of milk produced in the UK) to 1,800 liters (for Spanish milk), the global average being 1,050 liters. The same report calculated that the water footprint of a liter of soy milk produced in Belgium totaled 297 liters.
Proponents of soy like to point out that it’s a legume, like peas, lentils and peanuts. While growing, it therefore takes nitrogen from the air and puts it back into the soil. Nitrogen is a key nutrient for plants, and farmers who grow soy in rotation with other crops have found they needn’t apply so much artificial fertilizer.
Now for some bad news about soy.
First, as mentioned above, almost all of the soy that becomes tofu, soymilk or another product for human or animal consumption travels over 10,000km before it reaches a human or non-human mouth in Taiwan, even though the actual grinding into milk (or crushing for oil) is done locally.
Second, clearing land so soy can be grown is said to be a major cause of deforestation in Brazil.
Those who argue the Taiwanese diet was colonized by the US after World War II highlight the history of soy products on the island.
Before the 1895 Japanese takeover, local farmers grew black soybeans for making soy sauce.
What little soybean oil was produced was burned in lamps, or blended with more popular cooking oils, such as peanut or rapeseed oil.
By the early 1970s, however, the American Soybean Association had realized that its customers in Taiwan — who focused on crushing imported yellow soybeans into meal to feed to pigs and chickens — were awash in surplus oil.
In what seems to have been a case of conjuring demand for an unpopular commodity, rather than introducing a product that could meet an existing demand, the association worked to improve the quality of soybean oil, and promoted it heavily through TV and radio.
Despite old folks complaining that cooking with soybean oil made their stoves not merely greasy, but actually so sticky that only strong detergents could remove the glue-like gunk, the low price of soybean oil has ensured its popularity ever since.
Soy and dairy aren’t the only beverage options. If food miles are your main concern, rice milk could be a good choice, as Taiwan produces almost all the rice it needs, and rice milks are widely available.
According to an article on Earth911.com in August last year, the carbon footprint of rice milk is somewhat higher than that for milks made from soy, almonds or oats. Yet, liter for liter, it’s responsible for barely a third of the carbon emissions generated by cow’s milk.
Unlike the stuff that comes out of a cow, unfortified rice milk lacks useful amounts of calcium or protein, even though it has a much higher proportion of carbohydrates. Soymilk bottlers also add calcium and vitamins to make up for its deficiencies compared to cow’s milk.
Taiwan is one of the few countries in which you can have fresh, pasteurized goat’s milk delivered to your home. However, an article on Brightly.eco in September last year concluded that goat’s milk “is not significantly better for the environment than cow’s milk [even though goat farming] requires less water and land than cattle farming, and they produce less manure.”
I’m not sure if I trust this assessment, because the writer seemed to regard manure as a waste product and not as a valuable asset.
Some time soon, I’ll try goat’s milk in my morning pick-me-up. Until then: Anyone for black coffee?
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks.
When I visited John Lamorie’s eco-farm in Pingtung a few weeks ago, the first thing I saw when I stepped out of his car was an iguana running along the ditch that borders his property. “It’s been hanging around there for weeks,” he said. “Can’t get rid of him.” An invasive species from an exotic land that looks like a monster (the 1998 Godzilla film hints that Godzilla is a mutated iguana), iguanas have been in the spotlight for a year now, with a spate of articles highlighting their growing presence in southern Taiwan. The government banned their import in 2015,
North Korea isn’t at the Tokyo Olympics this summer. And therein lies a tale — one of sports and viruses, but most of all a tale of complex politics. While it’s not making headlines here, the North’s absence is noteworthy, especially among those who watch the intersection of sports and diplomacy — and the way North Korea’s propaganda machine uses international attention to advance its needs. The no-show is especially striking when contrasted with the last Games. Perhaps the hottest story of the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea, was the North Korean delegation, which included 22 athletes, hundreds of cheerleaders
With market-trembling new rules and investigations, Beijing’s crackdown on its most prominent companies has seeped into nearly every aspect of modern life, wiping billions of dollars from Chinese and Hong Kong-listed stocks and bamboozling investment sages. From after-school tutoring to music streaming apps, and shopping to bike-sharing, stellar firms have been hit as Beijing tightens the leash on corporations, citing national security and antitrust concerns. Whether motivated by the control reflexes of the Communist Party or to avoid market contortions hurting the pockets and safety of the Chinese public, few expect this to be the end of the crackdown. Here are some of
Hundreds of elected community leaders in Hong Kong have resigned and dozens of civil society groups have disbanded as China remoulds the finance hub in its own image. Just days before Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law on the city last year, student Wong Yat-chin founded a new group called Student Politicism. He had just finished his exams and wanted to keep opposition voices alive in a city supposedly still guaranteed free speech by setting up small street booths to discuss issues such as democracy and prisoner rights. Since then he has been arrested five times for hosting booths or making speeches. “The