At times, Invisible Justice (盲人律師) feels more like a television special due to its penchant for melodrama and soap opera-esque production style. But overall, it tells a solid and satisfying story that is worth paying attention to. It’s no groundbreaking masterpiece as a legal drama, but it tells a true story in an entertaining, emotional and informative way.
The film’s events are inspired by the real-life Radio Corporation of America (RCA) industrial pollution case, which allegedly caused more than 1,300 former Taiwanese workers to develop cancer. After a prolonged battle, the workers finally gained their first victory last year when the Supreme Court upheld its ruling for RCA to compensate 262 of its former employees and their families. The rest have vowed to continue to fight on.
As evident from the movie’s title, the focus is visually impaired lawyer Lee Cheng-hong (Chang Che-hao, 張哲豪), who has a major chip on his shoulder due to discrimination toward his disability and takes on the case to prove his worth. The character is based on his real-life counterpart, Lee Bing-hung (李秉宏), who became the nation’s first visually impaired lawyer in 2004. After being rejected from firm after firm due to his blindness, RCA was his first case.
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Lee’s story is even more dramatic than that portrayed in the film. He failed his graduate school exams 10 times and his bar exam twice, and suffered a devastating car accident in 2008 that took him a year to recover from. But as director Chris Hung (洪成昌) indicated in an interview, the main story is still the victims and their battle against an international corporate goliath, and the myriad challenges they face while seeking justice.
The pacing is fast, and the characters are understandably emotional given the circumstances, but as mentioned earlier, the dramatics could be toned down for more nuance and reflection. Still, the various sub-conflicts in the story arising from Lee’s pride and dogged persistence is what provides the human aspect to the story, from the fierce arguments he has with his devoted mother to him taking on his former mentor, who represents RCA, to his often tempestuous relationship with his plaintiffs. This man has something to prove, and it is through him that the story shines.
The use of humor also lightens the mood, which is timed well in small doses. And Hung obviously did his homework as the legal aspects of the battle are laid out in a way that a layperson could understand. The dialogue frequently alludes to various injustices in the world against the disadvantaged, and it’s clear what Hung is trying to say here.
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Chang does a pretty good job portraying a blind man, but more importantly he channels well Lee’s various emotions throughout the movie — especially the bitterness when Lee’s pride is hurt. However, his delivery is jerky and unnatural at times, and it’s not clear whether that’s just part of Lee’s persona.
The best actor in the film is acclaimed veteran Lu Yi-ching (陸弈靜), who portrays Lee’s mother. She does not seem to understand why Lee wants to be a lawyer so badly, but she quietly supports him in her own way, even when she knows it will cause conflict with her son.
Although kept to a minimum, a Christian element is apparent in the film, as it begins with a verse from the Bible and zooms in on a cross at Lee’s house in the opening scene. The end credits give thanks to numerous churches across Taiwan, and this reviewer overheard several people in the theater searching for their pastor in the movie — apparently quite a few characters are played by pastors from a number of churches.
Hung is a devout Christian, and makes no secret of his plans to use a portion of the proceeds to spread his faith. The real-life Lee is also a Christian, who frequently mentions God in his writings and interviews as the reason for his success. None of this is mentioned in the film, which is a wise decision to let the story tell itself instead of being too preachy.
If you do see the movie, make sure you stay in the theaters for the post-credits scene. Unlike the common use of this device for foreshadowing sequels or hiding Easter eggs, this scene actually explains a significant part of the movie — and those who walked out earlier probably left scratching their heads. This decision is highly questionable; this is no Marvel Studios production and post-credit scenes are usually not expected for this sort of film.
June 9 to June 15 A photo of two men riding trendy high-wheel Penny-Farthing bicycles past a Qing Dynasty gate aptly captures the essence of Taipei in 1897 — a newly colonized city on the cusp of great change. The Japanese began making significant modifications to the cityscape in 1899, tearing down Qing-era structures, widening boulevards and installing Western-style infrastructure and buildings. The photographer, Minosuke Imamura, only spent a year in Taiwan as a cartographer for the governor-general’s office, but he left behind a treasure trove of 130 images showing life at the onset of Japanese rule, spanning July 1897 to
In an interview posted online by United Daily News (UDN) on May 26, current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was asked about Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) replacing him as party chair. Though not yet officially running, by the customs of Taiwan politics, Lu has been signalling she is both running for party chair and to be the party’s 2028 presidential candidate. She told an international media outlet that she was considering a run. She also gave a speech in Keelung on national priorities and foreign affairs. For details, see the May 23 edition of this column,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS