When the Tiananmen Square Massacre came to a head on June 4, 1989, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called it a “crazy act that, although within our predictions, has caused us immeasurable grief and shock.”
Lee called for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to stop the violence, and for Chinese compatriots around the world to support the brave protesters in a “final showdown” with the CCP.
“This inhumane response will be judged by history, and it will spark greater resistance by our Chinese compatriots. This will just hasten the demise of the CCP... I would like to remind the soldiers and citizens in [Taiwan] to remain alert in case the CCP resorts to desperate action before its collapse,” he said.
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
Thirty years on, the CCP not only persists, but is stronger than ever. Nobody in Taiwan talks of saving their suffering compatriots in China anymore. Taiwanese presidents still make a statement regarding the massacre each time its anniversary rolls by, and the rhetoric reflects the times.
Last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) posted in simplified Chinese on her Facebook page: “I sincerely believe that if Beijing can own up to the June 4 incident and admit that it was an act of state violence, the unfortunate history of June 4 will become a cornerstone upon which China builds its freedom and democracy.”
“I hope that in the future, Chinese citizens won’t have to breach a firewall to access my Facebook page. I hope that people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait will enjoy freedom and democracy, which will allow for more space for mutual understanding and cooperation,” she continued.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
FIRST MEMORIAL CRITICIZED
On the first anniversary of the massacre, 64 non-governmental organizations and 25 student groups put together a remembrance event at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. In the afternoon, they held a charity sale to “support China’s democracy movement,” followed by a candlelight vigil, performances and video interviews with the surviving activists who had fled abroad.
Curiously, both the state-run Central Daily News (中央日報) and the Taipei Times’ sister paper Liberty Times (自由時報) criticized the event for being too festive. The latter ran a photograph of dancers onstage with the caption: “Commemorate or celebrate?”
Photo: Fang Ping-chao, Taipei Times
The Central Daily News printed a longer article titled: “The wounds of history have yet to heal, but have the blood and tears already dried up?”
According to the article, not only was attendance sparse in the afternoon, people’s attitudes also seemed indifferent. Few were willing to open their wallets, not even responding when someone made a passionate speech. During the colorful dance performances, upset attendees went backstage to complain to the organizers, sparking a full-blown war of words.
“The only part that stirred emotion was the interviews with the activists, but even that was brief,” the article stated. The activists were choking up onscreen, but “not a single tear was shed at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall.”
Photo: Chen Ping-hung, Taipei Times
That last bit is an exaggeration, but it shows the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) expectation that people would remain passionate about the tragedy, so they would continue to see the CCP as their enemy.
This was especially so with increasing interaction between both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Taiwanese were allowed to visit their relatives in China from November 1987, investment into China was continuing to grow at a fast pace and cultural and academic exchanges were on the rise.
A notable event in 1990 was the arrival of the cargo ship Goddess of Democracy (民主女神號) in Tainan. Chinese democracy activists in France had purchased the ship and planned to sail it to the South China Sea to broadcast the truth behind the massacre to the Chinese people.
That plan never came to fruition. A Tainan businessman purchased the ship, which arrived at Anping Port (安平港) just in time for the anniversary of the massacre. The ship remained there until 2003, when the government ordered its demolition as the owner owed the port NT$1.8 million (about US$57,000) in docking fees.
FADING MEMORY?
While commemorative events continued to take place on the massacre’s 10th anniversary, both the United Daily News (聯合報) and Liberty Times ran editorials commenting on how Taiwanese attitudes had changed, with each paper offering a different explanation.
The Liberty Times stated that as democracy took root and people shifted toward a Taiwanese identity, they separated themselves from China and became less emotionally affected by the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
Also playing a part in this changing attitude was China’s hostile behavior toward Taiwan, especially during the 1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis, when China launched missile tests in the strait.
What happened in China was still very much the business of people in Taiwan in 1989. But by 1999, even though people turned up to mourn the 10th anniversary of the massacre, the memorial spokesperson said that many attendees seemed to treat it more as a tragedy that had “happened in another country.”
“Taiwanese history and culture have been suppressed for decades, and we have our own historical memories that we need to rediscover,” the editorial concluded. “This change is only natural. There’s no need to reprimand Taiwanese society’s fading passion toward the Tiananmen Square Massacre.”
The United Daily News gave a completely different take, saying that as China’s economy improved, some people saw it as proof that the CCP had been working to stabilize society and better the lives of its citizens.
“Especially with the rise of Chinese patriotism and nationalism, it just doesn’t seem that there is any room for Chinese people to challenge the authoritarianism of their government,” the editorial concluded.
Yet the editorial also stated that as long as the Chinese government refused to acknowledge and take responsibility for the incident, the rest of the world, including Taiwan, would continue to hold commemorative events to remind the CCP of what it did in 1989.
As groups in Taiwan put on events and memorials for the massacre’s upcoming 30th anniversary on Tuesday, and as politicians continue to call for China to apologize for its actions and embrace democracy, it seems that all of these points above still ring true today.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Towering high above Taiwan’s capital city at 508 meters, Taipei 101 dominates the skyline. The earthquake-proof skyscraper of steel and glass has captured the imagination of professional rock climber Alex Honnold for more than a decade. Tomorrow morning, he will climb it in his signature free solo style — without ropes or protective equipment. And Netflix will broadcast it — live. The event’s announcement has drawn both excitement and trepidation, as well as some concerns over the ethical implications of attempting such a high-risk endeavor on live broadcast. Many have questioned Honnold’s desire to continues his free-solo climbs now that he’s a
Lines between cop and criminal get murky in Joe Carnahan’s The Rip, a crime thriller set across one foggy Miami night, starring Matt Damon and Ben Affleck. Damon and Affleck, of course, are so closely associated with Boston — most recently they produced the 2024 heist movie The Instigators there — that a detour to South Florida puts them, a little awkwardly, in an entirely different movie landscape. This is Miami Vice territory or Elmore Leonard Land, not Southie or The Town. In The Rip, they play Miami narcotics officers who come upon a cartel stash house that Lt. Dane Dumars (Damon)
Francis William White, an Englishman who late in the 1860s served as Commissioner of the Imperial Customs Service in Tainan, published the tale of a jaunt he took one winter in 1868: A visit to the interior of south Formosa (1870). White’s journey took him into the mountains, where he mused on the difficult terrain and the ease with which his little group could be ambushed in the crags and dense vegetation. At one point he stays at the house of a local near a stream on the border of indigenous territory: “Their matchlocks, which were kept in excellent order,
Today Taiwanese accept as legitimate government control of many aspects of land use. That legitimacy hides in plain sight the way the system of authoritarian land grabs that favored big firms in the developmentalist era has given way to a government land grab system that favors big developers in the modern democratic era. Articles 142 and 143 of the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution form the basis of that control. They incorporate the thinking of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) in considering the problems of land in China. Article 143 states: “All land within the territory of the Republic of China shall
RSS