When the Tiananmen Square Massacre came to a head on June 4, 1989, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called it a “crazy act that, although within our predictions, has caused us immeasurable grief and shock.”
Lee called for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to stop the violence, and for Chinese compatriots around the world to support the brave protesters in a “final showdown” with the CCP.
“This inhumane response will be judged by history, and it will spark greater resistance by our Chinese compatriots. This will just hasten the demise of the CCP... I would like to remind the soldiers and citizens in [Taiwan] to remain alert in case the CCP resorts to desperate action before its collapse,” he said.
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
Thirty years on, the CCP not only persists, but is stronger than ever. Nobody in Taiwan talks of saving their suffering compatriots in China anymore. Taiwanese presidents still make a statement regarding the massacre each time its anniversary rolls by, and the rhetoric reflects the times.
Last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) posted in simplified Chinese on her Facebook page: “I sincerely believe that if Beijing can own up to the June 4 incident and admit that it was an act of state violence, the unfortunate history of June 4 will become a cornerstone upon which China builds its freedom and democracy.”
“I hope that in the future, Chinese citizens won’t have to breach a firewall to access my Facebook page. I hope that people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait will enjoy freedom and democracy, which will allow for more space for mutual understanding and cooperation,” she continued.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
FIRST MEMORIAL CRITICIZED
On the first anniversary of the massacre, 64 non-governmental organizations and 25 student groups put together a remembrance event at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. In the afternoon, they held a charity sale to “support China’s democracy movement,” followed by a candlelight vigil, performances and video interviews with the surviving activists who had fled abroad.
Curiously, both the state-run Central Daily News (中央日報) and the Taipei Times’ sister paper Liberty Times (自由時報) criticized the event for being too festive. The latter ran a photograph of dancers onstage with the caption: “Commemorate or celebrate?”
Photo: Fang Ping-chao, Taipei Times
The Central Daily News printed a longer article titled: “The wounds of history have yet to heal, but have the blood and tears already dried up?”
According to the article, not only was attendance sparse in the afternoon, people’s attitudes also seemed indifferent. Few were willing to open their wallets, not even responding when someone made a passionate speech. During the colorful dance performances, upset attendees went backstage to complain to the organizers, sparking a full-blown war of words.
“The only part that stirred emotion was the interviews with the activists, but even that was brief,” the article stated. The activists were choking up onscreen, but “not a single tear was shed at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall.”
Photo: Chen Ping-hung, Taipei Times
That last bit is an exaggeration, but it shows the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) expectation that people would remain passionate about the tragedy, so they would continue to see the CCP as their enemy.
This was especially so with increasing interaction between both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Taiwanese were allowed to visit their relatives in China from November 1987, investment into China was continuing to grow at a fast pace and cultural and academic exchanges were on the rise.
A notable event in 1990 was the arrival of the cargo ship Goddess of Democracy (民主女神號) in Tainan. Chinese democracy activists in France had purchased the ship and planned to sail it to the South China Sea to broadcast the truth behind the massacre to the Chinese people.
That plan never came to fruition. A Tainan businessman purchased the ship, which arrived at Anping Port (安平港) just in time for the anniversary of the massacre. The ship remained there until 2003, when the government ordered its demolition as the owner owed the port NT$1.8 million (about US$57,000) in docking fees.
FADING MEMORY?
While commemorative events continued to take place on the massacre’s 10th anniversary, both the United Daily News (聯合報) and Liberty Times ran editorials commenting on how Taiwanese attitudes had changed, with each paper offering a different explanation.
The Liberty Times stated that as democracy took root and people shifted toward a Taiwanese identity, they separated themselves from China and became less emotionally affected by the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
Also playing a part in this changing attitude was China’s hostile behavior toward Taiwan, especially during the 1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis, when China launched missile tests in the strait.
What happened in China was still very much the business of people in Taiwan in 1989. But by 1999, even though people turned up to mourn the 10th anniversary of the massacre, the memorial spokesperson said that many attendees seemed to treat it more as a tragedy that had “happened in another country.”
“Taiwanese history and culture have been suppressed for decades, and we have our own historical memories that we need to rediscover,” the editorial concluded. “This change is only natural. There’s no need to reprimand Taiwanese society’s fading passion toward the Tiananmen Square Massacre.”
The United Daily News gave a completely different take, saying that as China’s economy improved, some people saw it as proof that the CCP had been working to stabilize society and better the lives of its citizens.
“Especially with the rise of Chinese patriotism and nationalism, it just doesn’t seem that there is any room for Chinese people to challenge the authoritarianism of their government,” the editorial concluded.
Yet the editorial also stated that as long as the Chinese government refused to acknowledge and take responsibility for the incident, the rest of the world, including Taiwan, would continue to hold commemorative events to remind the CCP of what it did in 1989.
As groups in Taiwan put on events and memorials for the massacre’s upcoming 30th anniversary on Tuesday, and as politicians continue to call for China to apologize for its actions and embrace democracy, it seems that all of these points above still ring true today.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
May 18 to May 24 Pastor Yang Hsu’s (楊煦) congregation was shocked upon seeing the land he chose to build his orphanage. It was surrounded by mountains on three sides, and the only way to access it was to cross a river by foot. The soil was poor due to runoff, and large rocks strewn across the plot prevented much from growing. In addition, there was no running water or electricity. But it was all Yang could afford. He and his Indigenous Atayal wife Lin Feng-ying (林鳳英) had already been caring for 24 orphans in their home, and they were in
On May 2, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), at a meeting in support of Taipei city councilors at party headquarters, compared President William Lai (賴清德) to Hitler. Chu claimed that unlike any other democracy worldwide in history, no other leader was rooting out opposing parties like Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). That his statements are wildly inaccurate was not the point. It was a rallying cry, not a history lesson. This was intentional to provoke the international diplomatic community into a response, which was promptly provided. Both the German and Israeli offices issued statements on Facebook
Even by the standards of Ukraine’s International Legion, which comprises volunteers from over 55 countries, Han has an unusual backstory. Born in Taichung, he grew up in Costa Rica — then one of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies — where a relative worked for the embassy. After attending an American international high school in San Jose, Costa Rica’s capital, Han — who prefers to use only his given name for OPSEC (operations security) reasons — moved to the US in his teens. He attended Penn State University before returning to Taiwan to work in the semiconductor industry in Kaohsiung, where he
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
RSS