When members of Taiwan’s elite declared independence as a move to halt Japan’s takeover of the country towards the end of the 19th century, one of the first things they designed was a flag to reinforce their determination to be free from imperial rule. A replica of the original flag, known as the Yellow Tiger Flag (黃虎旗) of the Republic of Formosa (台灣民主國), is currently on display at the National Taiwan Museum.
The museum’s curators said that the Yellow Tiger Flag embodied the aspirations of the pro-independence forces in Taiwan, which was ceded to Japan in the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki following China’s defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War.
Despite high hopes and fierce resistance, however, these anti-Japanese fighters only held out for five months before being overwhelmed by Japanese forces. The flag, having been captured, was immediately sent to Japan.
Photo courtesy of the National Taiwan Museum
The National Taiwan Museum, which holds a replica of the original flag painted in 1909 by Japanese artist Untei Takahashi, recently discovered documents that yield a greater understanding about the thinking that went into the design of original flag, the whereabouts of which remain unknown.
“We organized the exhibition so as to share our findings following extensive restoration, which took 15 months to finish,” Li Tzu-ning (李子寧), an associate curator at the museum, told Taipei Times in an e-mail interview.
The museum’s staff found that the tiger drawn on the back of the flag is different from the tiger drawn on the front. Though the overall features of the two felines look the same, there are minor variations.
“The pupils of the tiger on the front are round and open, while the ones at the back are crescent-shaped. This shows that the pupils dilate and contrast in response to the amount of light in the day and at night,” said Wu Pai-lu (吳百祿), a researcher who took part in the repair project.
“The two tigers, one posing for the day and the other for the night, create an image that is both symmetrical and complementary. It coincides with the belief that the flag will protect the nation day and night (日夜護國),” he said.
Though Takahashi’s work is only a facsimile, Wu says it’s “crucially important” because the original flag — or three flags according to some historical documents — is nowhere to be found.
Of the four existing duplicates in Taiwan, the Takahashi version is the only one that was commissioned and approved by the then-Japanese authorities. In 1953, Chiu Nien-tai (丘念台) — the son of Chiu Feng-jia (丘逢甲), the man who led the resistance against Japan’s occupation — commissioned respected artist Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) to create two paintings based on Takahashi’s flag. Lin produced another color ink version of the flag in 1974.
Although it continues to serve as a symbol of Taiwan’s autonomy, Lee said that today’s independence activists are disinclined to use the flag because of its complex associations with the past.
“The main reason is because the Republic of Formosa was so short-lived,” he said. “And, declaring independence was a diplomatic strategy” to return Taiwan to China.
In the next few months tough decisions will need to be made by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and their pan-blue allies in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). It will reveal just how real their alliance is with actual power at stake. Party founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) faced these tough questions, which we explored in part one of this series, “Ko Wen-je, the KMT’s prickly ally,” (Aug. 16, page 12). Ko was open to cooperation, but on his terms. He openly fretted about being “swallowed up” by the KMT, and was keenly aware of the experience of the People’s First Party
Aug. 25 to Aug. 31 Although Mr. Lin (林) had been married to his Japanese wife for a decade, their union was never legally recognized — and even their daughter was officially deemed illegitimate. During the first half of Japanese rule in Taiwan, only marriages between Japanese men and Taiwanese women were valid, unless the Taiwanese husband formally joined a Japanese household. In 1920, Lin took his frustrations directly to the Ministry of Home Affairs: “Since Japan took possession of Taiwan, we have obeyed the government’s directives and committed ourselves to breaking old Qing-era customs. Yet ... our marriages remain unrecognized,
Not long into Mistress Dispeller, a quietly jaw-dropping new documentary from director Elizabeth Lo, the film’s eponymous character lays out her thesis for ridding marriages of troublesome extra lovers. “When someone becomes a mistress,” she says, “it’s because they feel they don’t deserve complete love. She’s the one who needs our help the most.” Wang Zhenxi, a mistress dispeller based in north-central China’s Henan province, is one of a growing number of self-styled professionals who earn a living by intervening in people’s marriages — to “dispel” them of intruders. “I was looking for a love story set in China,” says Lo,
During the Metal Ages, prior to the arrival of the Dutch and Chinese, a great shift took place in indigenous material culture. Glass and agate beads, introduced after 400BC, completely replaced Taiwanese nephrite (jade) as the ornamental materials of choice, anthropologist Liu Jiun-Yu (劉俊昱) of the University of Washington wrote in a 2023 article. He added of the island’s modern indigenous peoples: “They are the descendants of prehistoric Formosans but have no nephrite-using cultures.” Moderns squint at that dynamic era of trade and cultural change through the mutually supporting lenses of later settler-colonialism and imperial power, which treated the indigenous as
RSS