There’s precious little good news from America’s current affairs media these days. Barely a week passes without another announcement of savage staff cuts, bankruptcies or even closures at newsrooms across the US. But last week champagne corks were popping. The Huffington Post, the New York-based liberal blog, announced it was setting up a US$1.75 million fund to help fill the gap left by the decimation of US investigative teams.
The initiative, said the site’s founder, Arianna Huffington, was an attempt to preserve good journalism in America. “For too long,” she said, “we’ve had too many autopsies and not enough biopsies. The HuffFund is our attempt to change this.”
The aim is to dig away at weighty subjects, starting with the economic crisis. The fund will provide for up to 10 staff, supplemented by freelancers, many of them old media stalwarts sacked from failing news institutions.
The fact that the rescue mission is being launched under the flag of the HuffPo — a blog best known for its vibrant commentary rather than news — underlines the blurring effect of the Internet revolution. Blogs are inheriting the investigative work of newspapers; newspapers are blogging.
The fund also signals the Web site’s ambition to move to a more central position in the media landscape — it began to call itself an “Internet newspaper” last year. April 2009 may well be seen as the moment the Huffington Post came of age.
The HuffPo’s rise has been impressive. Less than four years old and with fewer than 60 staff (including seven news reporters), it is now a competitor to the New York Times, 158 years old and with more than 1,000 journalists. According to the ratings Web site Comscore, in February the HuffPo drew more than a third of the Times’s traffic: 7.3 million unique users to 18.4 million.
Given the HuffPo’s ambition and position, some have started to question its methods, which they see as more in keeping with a startup company undergoing breathtaking growth than a beacon of journalistic hope and excellence.
It is a paradox that although the Huffington Post is household currency in liberal America, the company remains relatively little known. The focus is almost always on Arianna Huffington herself and her colorful life story — born in Greece, educated in England; married to and divorced from an oil millionaire; a right-winger turned left-wing scourge of Bush and champion of Obama.
Yet a steady trickle of information has started to flow from people with experience of the site who raise concerns that standards are not keeping up with the exponential increase in the Web site’s size and clout. In the past 18 months several experienced journalists have left core positions. The former managing editor, Elinor Shields, who came from the BBC, has not yet been replaced and she left in 2007 (though HuffPo is poised to appoint someone); the blog editor, Frank Wilkinson, now edits the US version of the Week (British weekly digest of UK and foreign media); Michelle Kung is now at the Wall Street Journal. The two journalists, including Amanda Michel, behind the groundbreaking and successful experiment in citizen journalism, OffTheBus, also left earlier this year. The project was designed to finish after the election but the departures were still surprising.
Some could argue this is a natural phenomenon in such a fast-moving world. And the HuffPo has made some good signings recently, notably the Washington reporter Ryan Grim, who was at the respected political Web site Politico. But key positions remain filled by people who came to the site with limited journalistic experience. Matthew Palevsky, for instance, has been brought in to run a new citizen journalism venture in Michel’s absence — pending the appointment of a new editor. He graduated from university last year. He also happens to be Huffington’s godson.
Marc Cooper, who worked with Michel on OffTheBus, left the Web site in January and now teaches journalism at the University of Southern California, where he also runs an online journal. He has been on both sides of the old/new media divide, having worked as a magazine writer and editor. Before he quit, he approached the founders about extending citizen journalism throughout the Web site.
He says they were resistant to the idea of having experienced journalists leading the project, which he felt was a requirement to maintain editorial standards. “I found there was an unbreachable gap between the scope of the HuffPo as a very big and powerful Web site, and its disproportionately undeveloped editorial processes.”
Cooper stressed that he wants the Web site to succeed and was proud of his involvement with it. Yet he believes its processes are sometimes immature. “I don’t see enough news judgment, or emphasis on the quality of reporting.”
Arianna Huffington accepts that growth presents new challenges. “We have put systems in place to make sure our reporters are properly edited, that there is constant communication between them and editors and as we are growing and expanding we are going to do more of that,” she said.
Other former employees interviewed by the Guardian would not go on the record, pointing out that every staff member has to sign a contract forbidding talk of internal matters. But several felt that as the site grows, it needs to invest in more original journalism. Huffington this week told Mediabistro that almost a third of the site’s content “comes from original reporting.” But most of the news content — as opposed to its commentary — involves aggregation in the form of links to other news providers.
During last year’s election campaign, reporters were encouraged by Huffington to stay at their desks rather than go out into the field. They were told desk-based journalism, often spent listening to the candidates’ conference calls, would be more productive. Others regretted the lack of any face-to-face communication between reporters and editors — there are no regular daily news conferences and only one fixed weekly conference call between Huffington and the politics team, although there is regular digital dialogue.
A final area of concern was the way stories are placed on the front page. The co-founder Kenneth Lerer frequently determines which stories lead the blog, and even writes headlines. As chairman of a company that was not long ago valued at up to US$200 million, aren’t his interventions in some way comparable to Rupert Murdoch’s interference in the front pages of his newspapers and thus potentially discomforting the blog’s liberal readers?
None of this would matter were the HuffPo not the powerhouse it has become. While the New York Times is in a life-or-death struggle to pay its debts, the HuffPo in December attracted another US$25 million in venture capital.
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
The centuries-old fiery Chinese spirit baijiu (白酒), long associated with business dinners, is being reshaped to appeal to younger generations as its makers adapt to changing times. Mostly distilled from sorghum, the clear but pungent liquor contains as much as 60 percent alcohol. It’s the usual choice for toasts of gan bei (乾杯), the Chinese expression for bottoms up, and raucous drinking games. “If you like to drink spirits and you’ve never had baijiu, it’s kind of like eating noodles but you’ve never had spaghetti,” said Jim Boyce, a Canadian writer and wine expert who founded World Baijiu Day a decade
RSS