Dunhuang is a name that resonates through the ages as one of the truly great treasure troves of art and culture. The National Museum of History's (NMH) exhibition From the Forgotten Deserts: Centuries of Dazzling Dunhuang Art, which promised so much, is not only a sad disappointment but an object lesson in how sloppy exhibition design can undermine even the most exciting of exhibits.
From the moment I walked into the exhibition area, I was exposed to a series of minor disappointments that marred much of my enjoyment of the exhibition. First there was the semi-literate English introduction posted in large type, with its usual complement of typographic errors. This is hardly the first time that the NMH has been guilty of this sort of carelessness, and for a national museum with international pretensions, carelessness of this kind is simply unforgivable.
Then there is the question of the arrangement of the artifacts. The exhibition is organized by theme, which is fair enough, but no attempt is made in the layout to create a sense of thematic or chronological progression. After your ticket is taken, you find yourself, without preamble, in an area of frescos featuring the theme of clothing, and a few steps further on, the frescos are illustrative of architecture. It all is rather haphazard, without clear focus or progression.
PHOTO COURTESY OF NMH
Then, moments later, one is brought to a further realization. The "frescos" that one is looking at are part of a collection of "30 genuine fresco copies" that are on loan from the Dunhuang Academy. While there is nothing wrong with copies being featured in an exhibition, it seemed a little odd that they would constitute such a large proportion of the exhibited materials -- a total of 102 items -- and most aggravating of all, that they are not clearly distinguished from the few original works: 10 very fine paintings on silk from the Musee National des Arts Asiatiques-Guimet.
To add insult to injury, some of the "exhibits" are no more than large-scale computer printouts -- of indifferent quality to boot -- of frescos. With exhibits of this quality, you would be better off with a book of illustrations.
Then there are the 20 "musical instrument replicas" from the Tainan National University of the Arts, most of which would not look out of place in the souvenir shop. As with the "genuine fresco copies," these may serve some purpose in an educational or research context but are certainly out of place as key exhibits.
As if all this wasn't enough, some of the frescos are sloppily tacked or pasted to the wall in a manner that would shame any self-respecting high school art class. By trying to pass this off as an international exhibition, and charging accordingly, the NMH is guilty of the type of skullduggery that can only injure its reputation. Taiwan's art lovers deserve more than this inept slight-of-hand.
Among the original works on display from the Musee National des Arts Asiatiques, there are two pages from the notebook of Paul Pelliot and a letter to Pelliot from his rival, Sir Aurel Stein. These documents are undated and are not given any context outside a timeline on the other side of the room and a brief background on Pelliot. Having placed these items in the show, no effort has been made to provide any context regarding the removal of Dunhuang's artifacts by foreign explorers in the early part of the 20th century.
Included in the exhibition are 12 works by Chang Da-chien (
It would be nice to say that the exhibition, despite its faults, is not without merit. Given the interest of the subject, it is really impossible not to learn something from the show, if one can put up with the frustration and irritation caused by the slapdash and thoughtless presentation. For the most part, a good book about Dunhuang would provide greater satisfaction, or check the list of academic and general links at the International Dunhunag Project links page at idp.bl.uk/chapters/links/links.html.
Exhibition Notes:
What: From the Forgotten Deserts: Centuries of Dazzling Dunhuang Art
Where: The National Museum of History
When: until May 29
Tickets: NT$150
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday delivered an address marking the first anniversary of his presidency. In the speech, Lai affirmed Taiwan’s global role in technology, trade and security. He announced economic and national security initiatives, and emphasized democratic values and cross-party cooperation. The following is the full text of his speech: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽), there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
As with most of northern Thailand’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) settlements, the village of Arunothai was only given a Thai name once the Thai government began in the 1970s to assert control over the border region and initiate a decades-long process of political integration. The village’s original name, bestowed by its Yunnanese founders when they first settled the valley in the late 1960s, was a Chinese name, Dagudi (大谷地), which literally translates as “a place for threshing rice.” At that time, these village founders did not know how permanent their settlement would be. Most of Arunothai’s first generation were soldiers
Among Thailand’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) villages, a certain rivalry exists between Arunothai, the largest of these villages, and Mae Salong, which is currently the most prosperous. Historically, the rivalry stems from a split in KMT military factions in the early 1960s, which divided command and opium territories after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) cut off open support in 1961 due to international pressure (see part two, “The KMT opium lords of the Golden Triangle,” on May 20). But today this rivalry manifests as a different kind of split, with Arunothai leading a pro-China faction and Mae Salong staunchly aligned to Taiwan.
RSS