With 31 artists from 20 countries set to participate in the upcoming Taipei Biennial, the city art scene is set to show its sophistication and diversity. And to let the global art community know that it's come a long way since hosting a more limited biennial in 1998.
Organized by the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, the festival will jump outside the limited East Asian scope of its predecessor, dubbed "Site of Desire." The effort of the Taipei museum to broaden and reach out has always been a goal of its management, which has continually pursued making the museum an international contender.
Acclaimed curator Jerome Sans from Paris and Taipei based Manray Hsu (徐文瑞) started to work on the project in February and have spent NT$24 million. Sans is the co-director of the Palais de Tokyo in Paris and adjunct curator at the Institute of Visual Arts in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. His coming on board was a much-anticipated blessing by local arts circles, especially since he contributed to the 1999 Venice Biennale. Hsu, on the other hand, is a local curator and art critic, a rising star who has nurtured the developing contemporary art scene in Taiwan.
PHOTO: TAIPEI FINE ARTS MUSEUM
The curators, a group of advisors from local arts circles, and the professional staff of the museum have worked together to select the 31 artists from around the globe. In general, they looked for artists that are futuristic and international in scope. Those who dare venture into technology, for example, are valued for their experimentation with the digital world.
The two curators finalized the theme of "The sky is the limit" in June. It's a wide open world under the sky and the implication is that there are all kinds of possibilities, infinite and boundless. The theme is tied into the timing of crossing into the new millennium. Curator Sans stressed the word hybrid in shaping a new world. The show will be small scale and intimate, yet it will also follow a theme of globalization.
The curators said that they want this occasion to be a forum to showcase the collective experiences of the participating artists and audiences. The sense of novelty is strong and the curators promised to "create a lab where actions and fantasies can be put into experimentation."
As the biennial attracts locals and foreign visitors alike, there is certain to be discussion about how such an event can serve to develop the Taiwan arts. Already people have questioned the residual impact of such a large-scale, costly venture in an attempt to determine its contribution to the growth of contemporary art in Taiwan, which is still not adequately developed, said Rita Chang (張元茜), independent curator and Taipei representative of Asia Culture Council.
Chang also pointed out that what's essential is that peripheral facilities have to be built to establish a sound environment for contemporary art, with the biennial serving as a catalyst.
Another benefit of the biennial is the increased media attention, as hundreds of arts writers and critics descend upon Taipei to cover the event. And what they will see is a more vibrant scene than a few years back. Venues such as the Washang Cultural District, an alternative space, have started putting together better exhibitions as support for contemporary art increases and can serve as side-stops for visitors to the biennial.
The Taipei Contemporary Art Museum is also scheduled to open early next year, which means debates and activities will abound this year to prepare for it. And the Taipei Fine Arts Museum itself will schedule two fascinating shows alongside the biennial. "Zero-in," curated by Chang, celebrates the new millennium and probes into the e-era, and "Taipei Chinese Chess" is a solo exhibition of Ren Rong, a Chinese artist using paper art and installation to make humanlike creatures that examine the relationship between nature and man.Participating artists
Candice Breitz (South Africa)
Hsia-fei Chang (Taiwan)
Shu-lea Cheang (Taiwan)
Loris Cecchini (Italy)
Claude Closky (France)
Meschac Gaba (Benin)
Kendell Geers (South Africa)
Gim Hongsok (South Korea)
Hanayo (Japan)
Hung Dung-lu (Taiwan)
Kim Soo-ja (South Korea)
Surasi Kusolwong (Thailand)
Kyupi Kyupi (Japan)
Lee Ming-wei (Taiwan)
Mark Lewis (Canada)
Michael Lin (Taiwan)
Liza Lou (USA)
Michel Majerus (Germany)
Jonathan Monk (United Kingdom)
Daniel Pflumm (Germany)
Henrik Plenge Jakobsen (Denmark)
Navin Rawanchaikul (Thailand)
Tobias Rehberger (Germany)
Sidney Stucki (Switzerland)
Pascale Marthine Tayou (Cameroon)
Uri Tzaig (Israel)
Wang Du (China)
Wang Jun-jieh (Taiwan)
Wang You-shen (China)
Erwin Wurm (Austria)
Jun'ya Yamaide (Japan)
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
“Taiwan’s Opposition Leader Comes to US With a Message Straight Out of Beijing” read a May 31 headline in the Wall Street Journal. Top US administration officials and members of Congress almost certainly read the WSJ, and if there was a bullet point takeaway that people in Washington should absorb ahead of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) arrival in DC on June 9, that headline is it. The last few columns have discussed this very topic, and the timing is not coincidental. While those top officials likely do not read the Taipei Times, judging by the number
RSS