President William Lai (賴清德) said Taiwan has strengthened interagency efforts to counter what he described as Beijing-linked transnational repression, including surveillance, cyberattacks and influence operations targeting Taiwanese overseas. Speaking at a security-focused forum in Taipei on Tuesday, he said Taiwan is expanding coordination across government agencies and with democratic partners to bolster resilience against disinformation, artificial intelligence-driven manipulation and spyware.
The seminar, attended by representatives from 29 countries, focused on responses to foreign interference and emerging digital threats. Officials from partner countries expressed support for deeper cooperation with Taiwan on safeguarding democratic systems and countering authoritarian influence.
Transnational repression has long been a concern raised by governments, rights groups and researchers, with allegations ranging from surveillance and intimidation to cyberoperations, pressure on diaspora communities and, in some cases, physical violence targeting people critical of Beijing.
One of the most prominent cases occurred in 2022 in Manchester, England, when Hong Kong protester Bob Chan was involved in an incident outside the Chinese consulate during a demonstration. He was allegedly pulled into the consulate grounds and assaulted by several people, prompting diplomatic protests from the British government and condemnation from human rights organizations, who said it highlighted risks faced by dissidents even beyond their home jurisdictions.
This year, British courts convicted a former British Border Force officer and a Hong Kong trade official for spying on pro-democracy activists in Britain. The case included allegations of monitoring and collecting information on exiled figures such as Nathan Law (羅冠聰), and was described by authorities as part of a broader effort targeting Hong Kong dissidents overseas through surveillance and intimidation.
In Canada, former Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer William Majcher was charged in 2023 with foreign interference-related offenses linked to allegations he assisted efforts to pressure a Vancouver-area resident to return to China to face fraud charges. Although he was acquitted this year due to insufficient evidence, the case has remained part of public debate about transnational repression and the use of intermediaries operating abroad.
Taiwanese have also been affected by similar concerns, particularly following China’s 2024 judicial guidelines on “die-hard Taiwan independence separatists.” Issued by the Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other agencies, the guidelines expand on how authorities can prosecute people accused of inciting secession, allow trials in absentia and hand out the death penalty for severe cases. They also suggest enforcement could extend beyond China’s borders, which analysts interpret as an attempt to assert extraterritorial reach, even though the measures have no enforceable legal effect in most jurisdictions and remain largely symbolic in practice.
One risk for Taiwanese working or traveling abroad is that some governments could come under pressure from Beijing to detain or transfer people sought by Chinese authorities, particularly in jurisdictions with weaker safeguards or closer security ties to China. The issue is especially sensitive in some developing countries where the International Cooperation and Development Fund offers aid and technical assistance as part of Taipei’s broader diplomatic outreach and soft power efforts.
There have been reports over the past few years of Taiwanese arrested overseas and transferred to China on fraud-related charges, often following Chinese requests via Interpol notices or bilateral police cooperation channels. In Spain, Taiwanese suspects in telecom fraud cases were extradited to China from 2017 to 2019, prompting strong objections from Taipei. Similar cases have been reported in parts of Southeast Asia, in which suspects were handed over to Chinese custody, raising concerns over consular access and due process safeguards.
While such cases typically involve offenses that are also crimes in Taiwan, concerns arise over how broadly China’s secession laws could be applied. Critics say that under an expansive interpretation, a wide range of expression could be construed as “promoting independence,” raising the possibility that even low-level online activity could be mischaracterized.
Another concern is that older Taiwanese living abroad might be particularly vulnerable to coercion or deception due to unfamiliarity with local legal systems and limited language skills, making it harder to recognize pressure, misrepresentation or intimidation by foreign actors.
Given these risks, Taiwan should strengthen cooperation with like-minded countries to improve information-sharing, identify potential cases and ensure timely responses through host-country legal systems against people or networks involved in transnational repression.
I arrived in Taiwan when I was 18, fresh out of high school and trying to navigate university life. Everything felt unfamiliar. My broken Mandarin quickly revealed what I already knew: I was not from here. When I told people I was from Indonesia, many told me that I did not look Indonesian. This caught me off guard, not because it was cruel, but because of how casually it was said. Sometimes it came with curiosity, sometimes surprise, occasionally admiration for my “fair skin.” More often than not, the people asking meant no harm. It is understandable. I look ethnically
On June 11, Beijing designated the Taiwan Strait and several areas around Taiwan to be “coastal waters.” For those not familiar with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), China’s designation constitutes a declaration of authority to control and regulate all maritime activities within those waters. Articles 8 to 11 of the UNCLOS gives coastal nations far more authority over their “internal waters,” that is the waters to the landward side of the geographic baseline that marks the start of the 12 nautical mile (22.2km) limit of their territorial waters. Internal waters include ports, rivers, inland waterways and
Five weeks since US President Donald Trump met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, his administration now faces two important tests in the Indo-Pacific. The first test is one of the president’s own making. After meeting with Xi, Trump described arms sales to Taiwan as “a very good negotiating chip” and announced that a previously approved sale was now “in abeyance.” The Financial Times later reported that Beijing is holding approval for a visit by Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, pending the president’s decision on the sale. During Trump’s first term in office, he regularized the arms
Nearly three decades after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong has become a paradox: a place where financial dynamism coexists with political repression — a reality Taiwan cannot afford to ignore. Despite a sharp contraction of civic freedoms since 2020, Hong Kong remains a major global financial center. It has recently overtaken Switzerland as the world’s largest offshore wealth hub, supported by steady inflows of capital from China and across Asia. The territory continues to serve as a key intermediary linking Chinese firms, multinational investors and global markets. Institutional continuity has played a role. The Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the
RSS