A proposed monthly NT$5,000 (US$159) subsidy for parents of a child aged 18 or younger is the most significant national childcare policy in the past few years, supporters of President William Lai’s (賴清德) initiative say.
The subsidies are more than welfare checks, more closely resembling a compensatory correction for the hangover from about 18 years of quantitative easing (QE).
Since the 2008 global financial crisis, prolonged low interest rates and monetary expansion worldwide prevented financial collapse, but also led to the decoupling and divergence of asset prices and wage growth. The gap intensified after another round of QE during the COVID-19 pandemic.
From 2020 to last month, Taiwan’s stock market rose from about 12,000 points to more than 40,000, a cumulative increase of more than 233 percent. Housing prices across Taiwan have also continued to soar.
The minimum wage, on the other hand, rose only from NT$23,800 in 2020 to NT$29,500 this year, lagging far behind asset appreciation rates. It is not the wealth of the general public that is growing, but the gap between those who own assets and those who do not.
Taiwan’s housing price-to-income ratio is in the near double digits, and in Taipei it is about 16 — far above what are considered to be reasonable levels. Despite increases in median youth wages, many young people find that their income growth cannot keep up with the speed of asset inflation.
Young families face high housing costs and high childcare expenses. Raising a child from birth through university age is conservatively estimated to cost NT$5 million to NT$8 million. For dual-income households, the expenses for each child’s upbringing might account for 30 to 40 percent of total household spending.
That is also one of the reasons behind Taiwan’s low fertility rate, which fell to about 0.695 last year.
When not having children becomes a rational economic choice for younger people, the issue becomes a national demographic challenge.
Discussion around the government’s monthly child subsidy should not just focus on whether to distribute the funds, but on whether the subsidies can start a shift of resources that have long flowed disproportionately into asset markets back toward wage-earning households that bear the greatest child-rearing burden.
The policy’s success depends not just on its scale, but on its design. Short-term subsidies are likely to be eaten away by inflation, so having part of the NT$5,000 deposited in a growth investment account is a promising step toward turning social assistance into social investment.
When households collectively gain an additional NT$5,000 in purchasing power, markets for childcare services, tutoring and rentals might respond by raising prices and offsetting the subsidy entirely. Without simultaneous reforms in housing, childcare services and taxes, cash transfers alone are unlikely to reverse declining birthrates.
The key issue is not how much money is distributed, but whether it remains in the hands of people who need it or flows back toward asset holders.
When hard work is no longer enough to achieve social mobility, people’s confidence in the future begins to erode. It is not only a problem in Taiwan, but also a shared generational fracture across all post-QE democratic societies.
At its core, the policy is a government attempt to repair imbalances created by nearly two decades of monetary expansion. Its success depends not only on whether the funds are disbursed, but on whether the government can preserve the real purchasing power of the NT$5,000 subsidy and prevent it from again being swallowed by inflation and asset markets.
Hsiao Hsi-huei is a freelancer.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Tuesday returned from her visit to the US, where she had met with several US senators and representatives, think tanks, and overseas Taiwanese and Chinese communities, espousing her vision of promoting cross-strait dialogue as a way to evade war. On Monday last week, she sat down with US academic Orville Schell and Asia Society Policy Institute distinguished fellow Daniel Russel. Russel is a seasoned diplomat who has served in positions related to East Asian and Indo-Pacific affairs. At the conclusion of the discussion, Russel employed his considerable diplomatic experience and knowledge
I arrived in Taiwan when I was 18, fresh out of high school and trying to navigate university life. Everything felt unfamiliar. My broken Mandarin quickly revealed what I already knew: I was not from here. When I told people I was from Indonesia, many told me that I did not look Indonesian. This caught me off guard, not because it was cruel, but because of how casually it was said. Sometimes it came with curiosity, sometimes surprise, occasionally admiration for my “fair skin.” More often than not, the people asking meant no harm. It is understandable. I look ethnically
Nearly three decades after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong has become a paradox: a place where financial dynamism coexists with political repression — a reality Taiwan cannot afford to ignore. Despite a sharp contraction of civic freedoms since 2020, Hong Kong remains a major global financial center. It has recently overtaken Switzerland as the world’s largest offshore wealth hub, supported by steady inflows of capital from China and across Asia. The territory continues to serve as a key intermediary linking Chinese firms, multinational investors and global markets. Institutional continuity has played a role. The Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the
In the aftermath of China’s expulsion of the New York Times correspondent Vivian Wang (王月眉), Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian (林劍) has publicly and explicitly articulated Beijing’s core thinking on the Taiwan issue. Chinese authorities accused the newspaper of promoting what they called “Taiwan independence fallacies,” and said that its description of Taiwan as a country amounts to a challenge to the “one China” principle. The significance of the incident goes beyond the reporting dispute and has given the international community a window into the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attitude toward Taiwan. Lin, in a statement, said
RSS