As Air Force One prepares to descend into Beijing for a summit overshadowed by wars in Iran and Ukraine, much of the international discussion has centered on whether Taiwan could become part of a geopolitical bargain.
Speculation has intensified over possible adjustments in US policy language, arms sales or diplomatic signaling toward Taipei. For many observers, the summit is being framed as a test of whether Washington’s commitment to Taiwan would hold. However, Beijing appears to be studying something far broader.
While the US debates diplomatic wording, China is closely examining the strategic lessons from the wars in Iran and Ukraine. The focus is not limited to missiles or battlefield tactics. Beijing is watching how modern conflicts reshape societies, alliances, markets and political resolve long before formal war begins. The real lesson Beijing sees in Iran and Ukraine is that exhaustion can achieve what escalation cannot.
Remarks by former senior US defense officials reflect growing concern in Washington that China’s Taiwan strategy might increasingly rely on “gray zone” pressure, cognitive warfare and disruption campaigns designed to weaken political cohesion over time rather than trigger immediate military confrontation.
Retired US lieutenant general S. Clinton Hinote warned that Beijing is likely studying how propaganda, social media manipulation and public uncertainty could influence democratic societies during crises.
Former US assistant secretary of defense Ely Ratner similarly said China might seek to pressure Taiwan “without firing a shot,” relying instead on cognitive warfare and expanded “gray zone” activities.
Elements of this approach are already visible across the Indo-Pacific region.
Japan faced coordinated disinformation campaigns after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments on Taiwan. Australia has repeatedly warned about foreign interference and online influence operations. Taiwan itself continues to experience near-daily military pressure, cyberattacks, disinformation efforts and economic coercion, operating simultaneously below the threshold of open conflict.
At the same time, Beijing is studying the economic dimensions of modern war.
Over the past few weeks, oil tankers have rerouted, insurance markets have tightened and global supply chains have once again been reminded how quickly strategic pressure could spread far beyond the battlefield. The disruption surrounding the Strait of Hormuz has demonstrated how even limited instability could generate outsized political and economic effects.
For Taiwan, these lessons carry particular significance.
China might not need an immediate invasion scenario to place Taiwan under severe pressure. The nation might not wake up one morning to the sight of an invasion fleet crossing the Taiwan Strait. Pressure could instead emerge gradually: delayed cargo shipments, restricted air routes, cyberdisruptions, rising insurance costs and a constant stream of online narratives questioning whether resistance is sustainable.
This possibility matters, because democracies often struggle with prolonged ambiguity. Gradual pressure rarely produces the same urgency as open conflict. Political divisions deepen. Economic actors become cautious. International attention drifts. Public fatigue accumulates.
That dynamic is especially important as China watches the growing strain on US resources and political focus from simultaneous crises in Europe and the Middle East.
This is why Taiwan should avoid viewing the summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) solely through the lens of diplomatic concessions or symbolic wording changes.
Taiwan’s greatest challenge might not arrive as a sudden invasion, but emerge gradually — through shipping disruptions, rising insurance costs, information warfare, political hesitation and growing uncertainty over whether democracies can sustain collective resolve under pressure.
By the time a crisis is formally recognized, the economic pressure, political hesitation and psychological fatigue could already be deeply embedded.
The Taiwan Strait might become the first place where blockade effects appear long before anyone formally calls it a blockade.
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the
RSS