In his 15 years as Apple’s top executive, Tim Cook has projected an image of the company as a champion of privacy rights. As he prepares to leave that role in September, that legacy has come back into focus. Cook trumpeted the iPhone maker’s commitment to privacy at home in the US and the EU, calling privacy “a fundamental right,” but his acquiescence to government demands abroad call his dedication to protecting users into question.
Cook cemented Apple’s pro-privacy reputation in 2015 when he resisted the FBI’s demands to unlock the iPhone of a mass shooter in San Bernardino, California. The company played up that public image in 2019 with playful ads that read: “Privacy. That’s iPhone,” positioning Apple as the obvious choice for people who cared about privacy. In 2021, Apple added a feature, App Tracking Transparency, that allowed iPhone owners to limit an app’s ability to track their mobile activity. Apps that tracked users without permission would be removed, Cook said.
The company even sued Israeli spyware firm NSO Group Technologies that same year, accusing it of surveilling iPhone users. Throughout his tenure, Cook spoke about privacy as a “fundamental human right,” and criticized Silicon Valley competitors Meta and Google for their expansive collection of user data.
Illustration: Mountain People
“This is surveillance,” he said at an EU privacy conference in 2018.
Unlike Apple, Google’s search engine, as well as Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, are not available in China, but Apple’s international concessions, particularly in China, its second-largest and fastest-growing market, complicate Cook’s privacy legacy.
Cook has walked a tightrope to ensure Chinese regulators allow Apple to maintain its strong presence in the region, which is key to its supply chain and consumer base. In Apple’s latest earnings report, the company reported a massive spike in iPhone revenue, driven by renewed demand in China.
Privacy advocates say Cook has been too submissive to the demands of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and in doing so has jeopardized the privacy of Chinese customers and their free speech.
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Cook has said that there is little to gain from castigating China, a response to criticism in 2017, when Apple pulled hundreds of apps from the nation’s app store at the government’s request.
“When you go into a country and participate in a market, you are subject to the laws and regulations of that country,” he said.
Cook added that his preferred choice was to “get in the arena, because nothing ever changes from the sidelines.”
Apple in 2018 transferred its Chinese users’ iCloud accounts to a state-backed data center in the country, following the enactment a year before of a cybersecurity law that required companies in China to host all data inside the nation. The Guizhou-Cloud Big Data center allows the Chinese government to more easily access texts, e-mails and images in those accounts, human rights activists say.
Chinese officials could, for the first time, bypass courts in the US to obtain iPhone users’ data directly from Apple. Human rights groups, including Amnesty International, worry this arrangement has helped China crack down dissidents, as Chinese law enforcement already has broad discretion to silence dissent “in the name of national security.”
“Chinese Internet users can face arrest and imprisonment for merely expressing, communicating or accessing information and ideas that the authorities don’t like,” Amnesty wrote.
Apple in a 2018 statement said that it was obligated to comply with new Chinese cybersecurity laws, noting: “While we advocated against iCloud being subject to these laws, we were ultimately unsuccessful.”
Under Cook, Apple has likewise moved Russian users’ data to local servers in Russia in compliance with local laws, raising similar privacy concerns amid the nation’s crackdown on dissent and general online expression, Bloomberg reported.
Since the onshoring of Chinese users’ data, Beijing has continued to pressure Cook and Apple, and in 2024 demanded that the company remove popular messaging apps such as Telegram, as well as the encrypted services WhatsApp and Signal from the iPhone app store. Apple complied.
“We are obligated to follow the laws in the countries where we operate, even when we disagree,” a spokesperson for Apple told the Wall Street Journal at the time.
While these apps could only be accessed in China through virtual private networks, they still had many Chinese users. The crackdown on messaging apps is part of a broader trend: A New York Times investigation in 2021 found that tens of thousands of apps disappeared from Apple’s Chinese app store over the past several years, including foreign news outlets, gay dating services and other encrypted messaging apps.
Apple’s “private relay” feature, designed so that no one — not even Apple — can see a user’s identity or the sites they are visiting, was not rolled out in China when it was released in 2021, nor in Saudi Arabia. The company said this was for regulatory reasons.
“What Apple has been very good at is being a pioneer at marketing privacy protections, but in reality, we found that a lot of that doesn’t actually play out in the way it operates,” said Katie Paul, director of the Tech Transparency Project.
In the US, Apple telegraphed a strong commitment to privacy when it refused to help the FBI bypass security measures of the San Bernardino shooter’s phone. Apple refused to help the FBI circumvent the phone’s four-digit log-in code and a feature that would have erased its data after 10 failed attempts. Cook had more to say, so he wrote an open letter to Apple’s customers, explaining his decision. The ability to encrypt phones is essential, and while he was outraged by the San Bernardino murders, and willing to comply with valid subpoenas and search warrants, Apple drew the line at enabling “a back door to the iPhone.”
“The US government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create,” he wrote. “The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a back door, and while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.”
The FBI ultimately withdrew its case, explaining that it no longer needed Apple’s help to access the phone.
On the domestic front, Apple has still faced criticism for the ways it cooperates with law enforcement. In September 2015, a few months before the San Bernardino shooting and well into Cook’s term as chief executive officer, Apple turned on iCloud by default for iPhone users, which largely remains the case today.
The Tech Transparency Project points out that turning on iCloud allows most users’ data to be accessible to law enforcement without the need for a pass code. Rolling Stone reported in 2021 on an FBI document that indicated it was easy to get iMessage data via warrant or subpoena.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
RSS