Lawmakers from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) last week announced a proposed referendum on introducing corporal punishment for certain “major crimes.”
Perhaps they have an eye on stirring up populist sentiment ahead of local elections at the end of this year.
While there are some Taiwanese who believe that corporal punishment would be beneficial for law and order, in reality it would be entirely ineffectual and only cause further harm.
Taiwan was ranked as the world’s fourth safest nation in Numbeo’s Safety Index this year. Of the world’s 17 countries or territories that practice corporal punishment, only the United Arab Emirates (UAE) came out ahead of Taiwan in the safety index, while Singapore lagged behind. The crime rates for rape — one of the offenses raised in the proposed referendum — are far higher in the UAE and Singapore than in Taiwan, at 1.5 and 6.6 cases per 100,000 people respectively, compared to Taiwan’s 0.27.
The UAE’s reportage rate is also likely substantially lower than in Taiwan. Corporal punishment itself would by no means improve law and order or make Taiwan a safer place to live.
Research has continually shown that corporal punishment against children has no behavioral benefit, instead teaching them that violence is the way to deal with those weaker than themselves. More often than not, it creates intergenerational cycles of family violence.
Likewise, corporal punishment would not lead perpetrators of violent crimes to turn over a new leaf, but only to further ostracization and resentment — and perhaps more harmful violence once out of the line of sight of authorities.
Corporal punishment for offenders of child abuse is also on the table. As seen in the Line conversation from the case of the Liu (劉) sisters — two nannies who were sentenced for torturing a one-year-old boy to death last year — children’s behavior is often used by perpetrators of abuse as an excuse for their actions.
In reality, it is a product of their own anger or cruelty. Corporal punishment is another example of spreading violence in the name of righting a wrong.
When punishment is needed, a simple “time-out” for children is comparable to the state’s use of imprisonment, which is the only form of legitimate punishment recognized by developed countries. It also lessens the “brutalization effect,” a theory suggesting that devaluing human life through state-sanctioned violence can increase homicide rates rather than deter them.
Furthermore, corporal punishment is in direct contravention of the UN Convention Against Torture, as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Taiwan incorporated into domestic law in 2009.
Without UN membership status like Singapore, Taiwan’s potential adoption of corporal punishment would not only be a stain on its image, but could also make it more difficult to participate in international organizations. It might also put existing privileges, such as visa-free entry to the EU, at risk.
Perhaps these knock-on effects do not concern KMT legislators. However, they are well worth the Taiwanese public’s careful consideration. Rather than corporal punishment, more effective routes are already being advocated by local and civil society organizations, including legal reforms — such as starting the statute of limitations for child sexual assault cases only when the victim becomes an adult — and improved support for social workers in preventing child abuse. These efforts would truly improve child and youth welfare.
Chen Jun-kuang is a physician.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS