Swiftly following the conclusion of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) China trip, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office unveiled 10 new policy measures for Taiwan.
The measures, covering youth exchanges, agricultural and fishery imports, resumption of certain flights and cultural and media cooperation, appear to offer “incentives” for cross-strait engagement. However, viewed within the political context, their significance lies not in promoting exchanges but in redefining who is qualified to represent Taiwan in dialogue with China.
First, the policy statement proposes a “normalized communication mechanism” between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This would shift cross-strait interaction from government-to-government negotiations to party-level engagement.
The issue is that aviation rights, quarantine rules, tourism and infrastructure fall within public authority and should be handled through formal, reciprocal mechanisms. Instead, China is pushing a policy with KMT endorsement, seeking to bypass Taiwan’s democratically elected government through alternative political channels.
Second, the 10 measures continue Beijing’s practice of “selective opening.” Agricultural and fishery access and food market provisions come with political preconditions. This ties economic opportunity to political positions, destabilizing markets and exposing Taiwanese businesses to risk.
While Beijing can open access quickly, it can also restrict it under administrative or technical pretexts, making such “incentives” potential structural vulnerabilities.
Third, the timing coincides with Taiwan’s upcoming local elections in November. Through KMT-CCP engagement, Beijing signals that if its political conditions are accepted, exchanges and benefits could resume, while implying the current government is responsible for the deadlock.
This framing deepens political polarization in Taiwan and reflects Beijing’s united front strategy.
The deeper issue is that the KMT-CCP meeting and the 10 measures erode the institutional basis for equal cross-strait interaction.
When parties replace the government as the primary channel, when exchanges are tied to unilateral political conditions and when Beijing can decide who represents Taiwan, democratic mandate and institutional legitimacy are weakened. Without equality, peace and progress become an illusion.
Wang Hung-jen is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Department of Political Science.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS