The war in the Middle East shows little sign of ending. Contradictory statements from Washington and Tehran about negotiations and timelines have made it difficult to assess the trajectory of the conflict. What is clear is that the war is continuing without a defined end, while its costs continue to mount.
For Taiwan, much of the attention has understandably focused on military lessons.
Since the start of the Ukraine war in 2022, analysts have been closely following how modern conflicts are fought, with discussions often centered on drones and loitering munitions, enhancing air defense systems, and expanding cooperation with the US, Israel and European partners.
Another aspect of modern conflicts deserves equal attention: the cost and sustainability of modern warfare.
Iran’s strategy relies heavily on volume. It launches numerous relatively inexpensive drones and missiles to overwhelm advanced air defense systems operated by Israel, the US and their regional partners. Official figures suggest that interception rates exceed 95 percent, yet the cost imbalance is striking.
Iranian drones and missiles are significantly cheaper than the interceptor systems fired to stop them. More than 5,000 munitions were launched in the first four days of the conflict, rising to about 11,000 within 16 days, Foreign Policy Research Institute estimates showed. Each interception consumes expensive and often limited defensive resources.
The imbalance becomes more pronounced when examining stockpiles. In the early stages of the conflict, the US reportedly used hundreds of Tomahawk cruise missiles and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile system interceptors, which are not easily replaced at scale. The US had to redeploy THAAD units from South Korea to the region, highlighting that modern warfare is logistically demanding and financially costly.
Another dimension that receives less attention in Taiwan is how conflicts shape the development and validation of military technology. In my professional and academic roles, I have had the opportunity to observe a weapon development program firsthand. Conflicts like this are effectively testbeds for new weapon systems. For that reason, defense contractors and industry professionals often see them as opportunities.
Since 2024, Taiwan has signed many memoranda of understanding on drone development with international partners, mainly from the US and Europe. Taiwanese companies are also showcasing their products at international exhibitions. These are important steps, especially for entering global markets such as Europe.
However, without follow-through, the effect of the efforts remains limited.
Nobody would wear brand-new hiking shoes on a long and demanding hike. Instead, they would test them in safer conditions, such as wearing them for a walk in Daan Park or on a trip to the grocery store.
That helps identify discomfort or potential issues before relying on them in more demanding situations.
The same logic applies to weapon systems. Taiwanese drones need real-world use to acquire high-quality feedback about their performance, limitations and reliability. Simulations and peacetime deployments are useful, but from engineering and operational standpoints, they are not enough.
Modern conflicts provide clear examples. Before 2022, Ukraine was not widely seen as a leading drone power, yet today it has developed significant expertise, with its systems and operators being deployed abroad, including efforts to counter Iran’s Shahed drones. Turkey has followed a similar trajectory, using multiple combat experience to refine its drone platforms and expand exports.
Shahed drones have been used in multiple conflicts and have proven effective in saturating high-end air defense systems. Even the US has adapted the approach by developing low-cost uncrewed combat attack systems to complement its capabilities.
At the same time, conflicts are exposing strains in defense supply chains. High consumption rates of munitions, combined with limited production capacity, are putting pressure on stockpiles. That might open opportunities for new suppliers, particularly those able to offer cost-effective and scalable solutions.
Taiwan is well positioned in that regard, given its technological base and partnerships.
However, moving from development to credibility requires more than attending exhibitions or signing agreements. It requires systems that are not only designed well, but also tested, refined and trusted under demanding conditions.
Although it is highly valuable to promote a “China free” supply chain, that alone might not be sufficient to access larger markets. For Taiwanese defense companies, the challenge is to show tangible operational value. Given Taiwan’s close relations with the US and Israel, and the growing strain on their munition’s stockpiles, there might be room for Taiwan to step up and obtain meaningful combat feedback.
Harun Talha Ayanoglu is a visiting research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS