In the wake of former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) conviction, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has offered a predictable counter: the verdict is not legal, but political — an orchestrated campaign by a supposed “party-prosecutor-media-court” alliance.
Huang is an academic with an Bachelor of Laws from National Taiwan University, a Master of Law from Cornell University and a Doctor of Juridical Science from Cornell Law School.
His doctoral research focused on civil procedure and evidentiary standards — the mechanics of how courts weigh evidence, test facts and uphold due process. Huang’s profile is not one of a man ignorant of judicial reasoning, yet his statements suggest otherwise.
Huang dismisses corruption reports as mere “hearsay” unfit for evidence — this is misleading. No competent court treats such reports as conclusive proof of guilt. They serve — as they do in legal systems worldwide — to corroborate documents, establish timelines and buttress witness testimony.
The 450-page judgement against Ko does not rest on a single report, but on a comprehensive body of evidence. Huang knows this.
Huang’s claim that the anti-corruption unit is biased, fares no better. Even if bias was proven, it does not automatically taint the evidence. Courts assess authenticity, consistency and corroboration — not the investigators’ presumed motives. Genuine, consistent documents supported by other proof remain admissible. To argue otherwise is to substitute suspicion for substance.
The alleged leak of the judgement raises legitimate procedural questions, but leaping from what is possibly an irregularity to a grand judicial conspiracy is rhetoric, not reasoning. A leak might demand investigation and accountability; it does not erase the substance of the court’s findings on contraventions in floor area ratios, urban planning laws or Ko’s knowledge and intent.
And that, ultimately, is the pattern.
Rather than grapple with the ruling’s legal merits, Huang attacks the institutions that delivered it. The debate shifts from whether the actions were unlawful to whether the entire system could be trusted. It is a clever political tactic, but it is also corrosive to the rule of law.
Once every inconvenient verdict is branded as political persecution, the law stops being a neutral arbiter. Courts become tools, evidence becomes suspect by origin alone and accountability dissolves into narrative warfare. The line between legitimate oversight and pre-emptive delegitimization vanishes.
Skepticism toward power is healthy, but skepticism without discipline slides into cynicism. Huang offers sweeping conspiracy claims, yet provides little beyond implication and rhetorical questions.
Huang’s academic career championed stronger procedural safeguards, discovery mechanisms, transparency and evidentiary rigor in systems that lacked them. His work was built on the belief that law must rest on tested facts and fair process, not perception or political convenience.
Today, those principles appear to be selectively forgotten when the outcome displeases his party. An academic who once demanded procedural integrity now cries foul whenever oversight proves inconvenient. A politician who rose on promises of accountability now questions the legitimacy of accountability itself.
Huang is free — indeed obligated — to criticize the judgement on its merits: challenge the interpretation of law, the weighing of evidence or the court’s reasoning. However, bypassing making substantive arguments to declare the entire apparatus compromised is to trade the discipline of law for the expediency of politics.
For a legal academic of his caliber, this is a choice. If Huang wishes to continue his political life with any credibility as a defender of justice and the rule of law, he must act less like a partisan operative and more like the judicious academic he was trained to be.
Taiwan’s democracy deserves better than convenient amnesia from those who once promised to bolster it.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
RSS