In the wake of former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) conviction, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has offered a predictable counter: the verdict is not legal, but political — an orchestrated campaign by a supposed “party-prosecutor-media-court” alliance.
Huang is an academic with an Bachelor of Laws from National Taiwan University, a Master of Law from Cornell University and a Doctor of Juridical Science from Cornell Law School.
His doctoral research focused on civil procedure and evidentiary standards — the mechanics of how courts weigh evidence, test facts and uphold due process. Huang’s profile is not one of a man ignorant of judicial reasoning, yet his statements suggest otherwise.
Huang dismisses corruption reports as mere “hearsay” unfit for evidence — this is misleading. No competent court treats such reports as conclusive proof of guilt. They serve — as they do in legal systems worldwide — to corroborate documents, establish timelines and buttress witness testimony.
The 450-page judgement against Ko does not rest on a single report, but on a comprehensive body of evidence. Huang knows this.
Huang’s claim that the anti-corruption unit is biased, fares no better. Even if bias was proven, it does not automatically taint the evidence. Courts assess authenticity, consistency and corroboration — not the investigators’ presumed motives. Genuine, consistent documents supported by other proof remain admissible. To argue otherwise is to substitute suspicion for substance.
The alleged leak of the judgement raises legitimate procedural questions, but leaping from what is possibly an irregularity to a grand judicial conspiracy is rhetoric, not reasoning. A leak might demand investigation and accountability; it does not erase the substance of the court’s findings on contraventions in floor area ratios, urban planning laws or Ko’s knowledge and intent.
And that, ultimately, is the pattern.
Rather than grapple with the ruling’s legal merits, Huang attacks the institutions that delivered it. The debate shifts from whether the actions were unlawful to whether the entire system could be trusted. It is a clever political tactic, but it is also corrosive to the rule of law.
Once every inconvenient verdict is branded as political persecution, the law stops being a neutral arbiter. Courts become tools, evidence becomes suspect by origin alone and accountability dissolves into narrative warfare. The line between legitimate oversight and pre-emptive delegitimization vanishes.
Skepticism toward power is healthy, but skepticism without discipline slides into cynicism. Huang offers sweeping conspiracy claims, yet provides little beyond implication and rhetorical questions.
Huang’s academic career championed stronger procedural safeguards, discovery mechanisms, transparency and evidentiary rigor in systems that lacked them. His work was built on the belief that law must rest on tested facts and fair process, not perception or political convenience.
Today, those principles appear to be selectively forgotten when the outcome displeases his party. An academic who once demanded procedural integrity now cries foul whenever oversight proves inconvenient. A politician who rose on promises of accountability now questions the legitimacy of accountability itself.
Huang is free — indeed obligated — to criticize the judgement on its merits: challenge the interpretation of law, the weighing of evidence or the court’s reasoning. However, bypassing making substantive arguments to declare the entire apparatus compromised is to trade the discipline of law for the expediency of politics.
For a legal academic of his caliber, this is a choice. If Huang wishes to continue his political life with any credibility as a defender of justice and the rule of law, he must act less like a partisan operative and more like the judicious academic he was trained to be.
Taiwan’s democracy deserves better than convenient amnesia from those who once promised to bolster it.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
The Legislative Yuan on Friday held another cross-party caucus negotiation on a special act for bolstering national defense that the Executive Yuan had proposed last year. The party caucuses failed to reach a consensus on several key provisions, so the next session is scheduled for today, where many believe substantial progress would finally be made. The plan for an eight-year NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.59 billion) special defense budget was first proposed by the Cabinet in November last year, but the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers have continuously blocked it from being listed on the agenda for
On Tuesday last week, the Presidential Office announced, less than 24 hours before he was scheduled to depart, that President William Lai’s (賴清德) planned official trip to Eswatini, Taiwan’s sole diplomatic ally in Africa, had been delayed. It said that the three island nations of Seychelles, Mauritius and Madagascar had, without prior notice, revoked the charter plane’s overflight permits following “intense pressure” from China. Lai, in his capacity as the Republic of China’s (ROC) president, was to attend the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s accession. King Mswati visited Taiwan to attend Lai’s inauguration in 2024. This is the first
RSS