Since the legislative session began in February 2024, the level of conflict and political disarray have continued to escalate. With their combined majority, the opposition parties have turned the Legislative Yuan into an arena of decisions without debate, pushing through one absurd bill after another and cornering the Cabinet into submission.
Even the Constitutional Court, meant to safeguard the nation’s free and democratic constitutional order, was targeted by the legislature. Between raising the official quorum and blocking the government’s nominations for grand justices to fill vacancies to meet said quorum, the court was effectively paralyzed for nearly a full year.
In December last year, the Executive Yuan moved to stop the onslaught of absurd legislation being promulgated by refusing to countersign for the first time. In that same month, the five sitting grand justices of the Constitutional Court ruled that the amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) — which raised the quorum — passed by the opposition-controlled legislature were unconstitutional, ending its period of de facto limbo.
Despite being four months into the fiscal year already, the central government’s annual budget has been stuck in a bottleneck for more than seven months, with the legislature yet to refer it to a committee for review. Where, then, do we go from here? In accordance with Article 30 of the Budget Act (預算法), the Executive Yuan has already set the direction for administrative policies for the next fiscal year in nine months’ time. Over the next few months, each competent authority would submit their individual policy plans, including income and expenditure estimates, to the Executive Yuan for approval. In August, the Executive Yuan must send its central government budget proposal for the following year to the legislature for review. If the spectacle of two separate annual budgets simultaneously pending legislative go-ahead comes to pass, it would be a first in the history of Taiwan’s fiscal governance.
Finances are the precursor to operational governance, and key to the welfare of the people. Article 54 of the Budget Act allows for a number of temporary budgets to be disbursed based on the previous fiscal year, preventing government agencies from shutting down entirely. However, this allows no flexibility for new expenditure items or projects, which stalls government initiatives.
Ultimately, authority over the nation’s fiscal governance lies with the executive branch, and public funds are held in its coffers. In this extraordinary period the legislature’s refusal to review the annual budget has given rise to, the Executive Yuan must also be willing to take extraordinary measures to salvage the situation and respond to the changing political landscape.
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective