The decision by five members of Iran’s women’s national soccer team to withdraw their asylum application in Australia has drawn global attention.
Reports suggest that the captain’s mother was summoned and pressured by the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, forcing her and other team members to reverse course. The incident reveals how authoritarian power operates. Under such regimes, borders do not define the limits of control — intimidation does.
The use of family members as leverage is a familiar tactic across authoritarian systems. When a regime cannot directly control people abroad, it turns to those still within reach — summoning relatives, issuing threats, confiscating property or applying social pressure to force compliance. The Iranian case is particularly chilling, because it lays bare a brutal truth: Under authoritarian rule, a person’s freedom is often built on the risk borne by their family. What appears to be a personal choice is a coerced political compromise between safety and kinship.
In the past few years, China has repeatedly been accused of harassing and intimidating dissidents overseas. Through diaspora organizations, student groups and digital networks, Beijing has built systems of monitoring and mobilization beyond its borders. Those who openly criticize the regime face phone harassment, online smear campaigns, surveillance, and — most tellingly — pressure exerted through family members back home. This strategy of using family as leverage mirrors, almost exactly, what the Iranian player experienced.
This carries direct implications for Taiwan. If public officials hold Chinese citizenship or maintain deep ties of dependence with the Chinese state, questions of loyalty become structural vulnerabilities.
The Chinese Communist Party’s ability to exert pressure on people beyond its borders is well documented. If officials entrusted with sensitive information are subject to such leverage, the potential consequences are difficult to overstate.
The Iranian case offers a clear window into the nature of authoritarian politics. These regimes do not simply seek to control their own populations; they extend intimidation far beyond their borders. As countries around the world begin to recognize and respond to such transnational coercion, Taiwan cannot afford complacency. Only by drawing firm institutional boundaries — bolstering national security frameworks and clarifying standards of political loyalty — can it ensure that its democratic system is not infiltrated, coerced or gradually eroded.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a legal professional.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS