The decision by five members of Iran’s women’s national soccer team to withdraw their asylum application in Australia has drawn global attention.
Reports suggest that the captain’s mother was summoned and pressured by the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, forcing her and other team members to reverse course. The incident reveals how authoritarian power operates. Under such regimes, borders do not define the limits of control — intimidation does.
The use of family members as leverage is a familiar tactic across authoritarian systems. When a regime cannot directly control people abroad, it turns to those still within reach — summoning relatives, issuing threats, confiscating property or applying social pressure to force compliance. The Iranian case is particularly chilling, because it lays bare a brutal truth: Under authoritarian rule, a person’s freedom is often built on the risk borne by their family. What appears to be a personal choice is a coerced political compromise between safety and kinship.
In the past few years, China has repeatedly been accused of harassing and intimidating dissidents overseas. Through diaspora organizations, student groups and digital networks, Beijing has built systems of monitoring and mobilization beyond its borders. Those who openly criticize the regime face phone harassment, online smear campaigns, surveillance, and — most tellingly — pressure exerted through family members back home. This strategy of using family as leverage mirrors, almost exactly, what the Iranian player experienced.
This carries direct implications for Taiwan. If public officials hold Chinese citizenship or maintain deep ties of dependence with the Chinese state, questions of loyalty become structural vulnerabilities.
The Chinese Communist Party’s ability to exert pressure on people beyond its borders is well documented. If officials entrusted with sensitive information are subject to such leverage, the potential consequences are difficult to overstate.
The Iranian case offers a clear window into the nature of authoritarian politics. These regimes do not simply seek to control their own populations; they extend intimidation far beyond their borders. As countries around the world begin to recognize and respond to such transnational coercion, Taiwan cannot afford complacency. Only by drawing firm institutional boundaries — bolstering national security frameworks and clarifying standards of political loyalty — can it ensure that its democratic system is not infiltrated, coerced or gradually eroded.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a legal professional.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS