Over the past few years, the number of Taiwanese seeking employment in the US has grown. With major changes to the H-1B lottery rules for fiscal year 2027, international students, young professionals already in the US and employers planning overseas assignments confront new challenges — and new opportunities.
The new rules increase complexity, but do not close the door. With proper planning, Taiwanese applicants can still stand out.
The most significant change ties lottery selection odds directly to wage level. A Level 1 registration receives one lottery entry, while a Level 4 registration receives four. Applicants with a master’s degree from a US univeristy retain an advantage: They are first placed in the separate 20,000 allocation and, if not selected, are then included in the regular 65,000 cap lottery.
However, the greatest risk lies not in the lottery itself, but in what follows. People frequently ask whether employers can select a higher wage level to increase selection odds. The answer is: “no.” The true hurdle in the H-1B process is the review process after selection.
The US Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) has placed strong emphasis on alignment across filings. The job classification selected at registration, the wage level chosen, the Labor Condition Application filed with the Department of Labor and the final job description must all align. If an employer lists a Level 4 wage while describing entry-level duties, or lacks the financial ability to support the salary offered, such discrepancies are likely to trigger a Request for Evidence — or even a denial.
Attempts to manipulate geographic wage differences carry similar risks. Wage standards vary widely across regions, but any claimed work location must reflect genuine residence and employment patterns. Inconsistent filings can damage credibility far beyond a single petition.
However, lawful alternatives remain available.
First, employers can review job duties to ensure positions are properly classified at an appropriate wage level.
Compensation structures can also be adjusted. USCIS evaluates fixed base salary only — bonuses are excluded. Converting part of variable compensation into fixed pay could help.
Regional wage differences could be relevant, but only when based on genuine work arrangements. If remote work is permitted and the employee resides and performs most duties in a lower-wage area, the wage level could correspond to that location.
Applicants should also avoid treating the H-1B as the only pathway to staying in the US.
Taiwan’s treaty status provides access to alternatives such as the E-2 Treaty Investor visa. Multinational employers can consider an L-1 Intracompany Transferee visa. On the permanent residency side, employer-sponsored EB-2/EB-3 categories do not legally require prior H-1B status. With proper planning, green card processes can begin during F-1 or OPT periods. Semiconductor engineers engaged in research and development, flight instructors who contribute to aviation safety and specialized professionals might also qualify for EB-2 National Interest Waiver petitions without employer sponsorship.
The US job market is competitive, and many employers are unfamiliar with immigration procedures. Taiwanese professionals must therefore plan proactively. Early coordination among employee, employer and counsel is essential to evaluate visa and permanent residency options before deadlines create pressure.
As the system becomes more complex, strategic preparation is no longer optional — it is the decisive factor in success.
Danny Chen is principal attorney at Green Maple Law Group.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission