Since taking office in 2024, President William Lai (賴清德) has faced an opposition-held majority in the legislature. Major policy initiatives have been blocked, with ramifications for governing efficiency and Taiwan’s broader political climate.
When executive-legislative tensions ran high while Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were president, they convened national affairs conferences to build consensus, opening the door for cross-party cooperation and national development.
In 1990, the Wild Lily student movement sparked a wave of reform. Lee convened a national affairs conference, bringing together opposition and ruling party members, as well as academics, experts and community representatives, to deliberate on constitutional and political reforms. As a result, the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion were abolished and the legislature was re-elected.
That helped lay the foundations for democratization, shifting the arena of political confrontation from the streets to formal institutions.
In December 1996, following his re-election earlier in the year, Lee convened another conference focused on improving the constitutional system, cross-strait relations and economic development. It achieved a consensus on streamlining provincial governments and privatizing state-owned enterprises, providing direction for institutional reforms and an economic transition.
The elections in 2000 saw the formation of Taiwan’s first minority government, with Chen at the helm. To ease confrontation, Chen convened a cross-party leaders’ summit followed by the Economic Development and Advisory Conference, which brought together voices from politics, labor, business, academia and think tanks. The meeting helped advance the cross-strait economic principle of “active opening, effective management,” generating a cooperative consensus for reform.
Today, multiple reform initiatives and major infrastructure proposals advanced by the government — including a defense budget and tariff agreement with the US — have been blocked by the legislature, with some unable to be referred to committee. Aside from having substantial implications for Taiwan’s development, the two proposals bear heavily on the nation’s cooperation and relationship with the US. The opposition’s repeated obstructions of the bills have drawn Washington’s attention, with a bipartisan group of US lawmakers cosigning a letter to express their concern.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) last month said that “the US is our benefactor, but China is our family.” Yet she has attacked the tariff decisions and arms procurement deals involving toward the “benefactor” that are critical to Taiwan’s future, while affording few opportunities for dialogue with members of the ruling party, who, as fellow Taiwanese, must surely count as “family.”
At this impasse, convening a national affairs conference could offer an institutional platform for consensus-building through cross-party dialogue, paving the way forward through democratic processes. If the opposition refuses to participate, the public would see the government offering an olive branch and the opposition too beset by division to engage, from which they could form their own judgements.
With the Lunar New Year holiday passed, the time is ripe to seek a new political atmosphere. Indeed, Lai invited the heads of the five branches of government to an event on Monday, the first working day after the holiday. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) issued a statement placing the special defense budget as the top priority for the new session and the Taiwan People’s Party caucus has also said it would send a bill to committee.
Glimmers of cross-party cooperation are emerging, but Lai must go further and convene a conference.
Constitutional and historical issues of greater complexity were faced and worked through by leaders such as Lee and Chen. More than 30 years after democratization, Taiwan’s institutions are more mature and its people more rational. Taiwan can safeguard sovereignty, build an internal consensus and chart a more stable future.
Chen Yu-hsin is a former Taichung County deputy commissioner.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS