Since taking office in 2024, President William Lai (賴清德) has faced an opposition-held majority in the legislature. Major policy initiatives have been blocked, with ramifications for governing efficiency and Taiwan’s broader political climate.
When executive-legislative tensions ran high while Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were president, they convened national affairs conferences to build consensus, opening the door for cross-party cooperation and national development.
In 1990, the Wild Lily student movement sparked a wave of reform. Lee convened a national affairs conference, bringing together opposition and ruling party members, as well as academics, experts and community representatives, to deliberate on constitutional and political reforms. As a result, the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion were abolished and the legislature was re-elected.
That helped lay the foundations for democratization, shifting the arena of political confrontation from the streets to formal institutions.
In December 1996, following his re-election earlier in the year, Lee convened another conference focused on improving the constitutional system, cross-strait relations and economic development. It achieved a consensus on streamlining provincial governments and privatizing state-owned enterprises, providing direction for institutional reforms and an economic transition.
The elections in 2000 saw the formation of Taiwan’s first minority government, with Chen at the helm. To ease confrontation, Chen convened a cross-party leaders’ summit followed by the Economic Development and Advisory Conference, which brought together voices from politics, labor, business, academia and think tanks. The meeting helped advance the cross-strait economic principle of “active opening, effective management,” generating a cooperative consensus for reform.
Today, multiple reform initiatives and major infrastructure proposals advanced by the government — including a defense budget and tariff agreement with the US — have been blocked by the legislature, with some unable to be referred to committee. Aside from having substantial implications for Taiwan’s development, the two proposals bear heavily on the nation’s cooperation and relationship with the US. The opposition’s repeated obstructions of the bills have drawn Washington’s attention, with a bipartisan group of US lawmakers cosigning a letter to express their concern.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) last month said that “the US is our benefactor, but China is our family.” Yet she has attacked the tariff decisions and arms procurement deals involving toward the “benefactor” that are critical to Taiwan’s future, while affording few opportunities for dialogue with members of the ruling party, who, as fellow Taiwanese, must surely count as “family.”
At this impasse, convening a national affairs conference could offer an institutional platform for consensus-building through cross-party dialogue, paving the way forward through democratic processes. If the opposition refuses to participate, the public would see the government offering an olive branch and the opposition too beset by division to engage, from which they could form their own judgements.
With the Lunar New Year holiday passed, the time is ripe to seek a new political atmosphere. Indeed, Lai invited the heads of the five branches of government to an event on Monday, the first working day after the holiday. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) issued a statement placing the special defense budget as the top priority for the new session and the Taiwan People’s Party caucus has also said it would send a bill to committee.
Glimmers of cross-party cooperation are emerging, but Lai must go further and convene a conference.
Constitutional and historical issues of greater complexity were faced and worked through by leaders such as Lee and Chen. More than 30 years after democratization, Taiwan’s institutions are more mature and its people more rational. Taiwan can safeguard sovereignty, build an internal consensus and chart a more stable future.
Chen Yu-hsin is a former Taichung County deputy commissioner.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS