Since taking office in 2024, President William Lai (賴清德) has faced an opposition-held majority in the legislature. Major policy initiatives have been blocked, with ramifications for governing efficiency and Taiwan’s broader political climate.
When executive-legislative tensions ran high while Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were president, they convened national affairs conferences to build consensus, opening the door for cross-party cooperation and national development.
In 1990, the Wild Lily student movement sparked a wave of reform. Lee convened a national affairs conference, bringing together opposition and ruling party members, as well as academics, experts and community representatives, to deliberate on constitutional and political reforms. As a result, the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion were abolished and the legislature was re-elected.
That helped lay the foundations for democratization, shifting the arena of political confrontation from the streets to formal institutions.
In December 1996, following his re-election earlier in the year, Lee convened another conference focused on improving the constitutional system, cross-strait relations and economic development. It achieved a consensus on streamlining provincial governments and privatizing state-owned enterprises, providing direction for institutional reforms and an economic transition.
The elections in 2000 saw the formation of Taiwan’s first minority government, with Chen at the helm. To ease confrontation, Chen convened a cross-party leaders’ summit followed by the Economic Development and Advisory Conference, which brought together voices from politics, labor, business, academia and think tanks. The meeting helped advance the cross-strait economic principle of “active opening, effective management,” generating a cooperative consensus for reform.
Today, multiple reform initiatives and major infrastructure proposals advanced by the government — including a defense budget and tariff agreement with the US — have been blocked by the legislature, with some unable to be referred to committee. Aside from having substantial implications for Taiwan’s development, the two proposals bear heavily on the nation’s cooperation and relationship with the US. The opposition’s repeated obstructions of the bills have drawn Washington’s attention, with a bipartisan group of US lawmakers cosigning a letter to express their concern.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) last month said that “the US is our benefactor, but China is our family.” Yet she has attacked the tariff decisions and arms procurement deals involving toward the “benefactor” that are critical to Taiwan’s future, while affording few opportunities for dialogue with members of the ruling party, who, as fellow Taiwanese, must surely count as “family.”
At this impasse, convening a national affairs conference could offer an institutional platform for consensus-building through cross-party dialogue, paving the way forward through democratic processes. If the opposition refuses to participate, the public would see the government offering an olive branch and the opposition too beset by division to engage, from which they could form their own judgements.
With the Lunar New Year holiday passed, the time is ripe to seek a new political atmosphere. Indeed, Lai invited the heads of the five branches of government to an event on Monday, the first working day after the holiday. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) issued a statement placing the special defense budget as the top priority for the new session and the Taiwan People’s Party caucus has also said it would send a bill to committee.
Glimmers of cross-party cooperation are emerging, but Lai must go further and convene a conference.
Constitutional and historical issues of greater complexity were faced and worked through by leaders such as Lee and Chen. More than 30 years after democratization, Taiwan’s institutions are more mature and its people more rational. Taiwan can safeguard sovereignty, build an internal consensus and chart a more stable future.
Chen Yu-hsin is a former Taichung County deputy commissioner.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS