Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) has said that while the US was Taiwan’s benefactor, China is family.
That statement is not only logically flawed, but a serious misjudgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality. As Chinese military aircraft continue to intrude on Taiwanese airspace and threats against the nation continue, this kind of emotionally manipulative rhetoric blurring the line between friend and foe only serves to sap the public’s will to defend itself.
The distinction between “China” and “family” must be clarified. It is true that many people in Taiwan have relatives across the Strait, but that is a matter of personal familial ties.
At the national level, the People’s Republic of China regime has never abandoned its goal of annexing Taiwan — that makes it a foreign hostile force. When the Chinese People’s Liberation Army and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aim missiles at Taiwan, they do not regard the nation as family — they stand as enemies of the Republic of China, a nation still embroiled in national and historical grievances.
History has shown that when Chinese turn on one another, the brutality of their methods and their disregard for human life often know no limits. To call a neighbor that is seeking to destroy your nation’s democratic system “family” is not an act of tolerance, but of folly.
As for the claim that the US is a “benefactor,” Cheng even further distorted the truth. It is true that the US did assist former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) in resisting the CCP and acted as an ally in protecting Taiwan from being “liberated.” It has betrayed Taiwan in the past.
More important to remember is that the US and Taiwan were once “benefactors” of China’s economic takeoff. Taiwanese businesses poured into China and the US helped usher it into the World Trade Organization, paving the way for former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) policy of “reform and opening up,” and economic prosperity. However, the CCP has responded with nothing but ingratitude — its military expansion undermines the geopolitical balance and threatens the very benefactors that contributed to its rise.
The core logic is that bolstering Taiwan’s defense resilience is by no means an act of provocation, but a matter of self-preservation, preventing annexation by a hostile state. The KMT often pressures the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to abandon the idea of Taiwanese independence, yet in reality, the Resolution on Taiwan’s Future — a declaration adopted by the DPP’s national convention in 1999 — clearly states that Taiwan’s future is to be decided by its 23 million people.
The true threat of war does not stem from discourse on Taiwanese independence, but from the CCP’s obsessive fixation on unification. If China were to abandon its goal of unifying with Taiwan, would the nation need to seek independence? And if the KMT were to abandon its goal of unifying with China, would it need to remain entangled with the CCP?
Taiwanese originally bore no inherent enmity toward China. It was the KMT that brought such hatred to this land following the Chinese Civil War.
Today, we face a dishonest neighbor — one that treats even its own people as cannon fodder. Taiwan can secure its survival only by clearly recognizing the reality of who is an enemy and who is a friend, and bolstering its national defense to deter the CCP’s delusional ambitions.
We must not allow “united front” logic to be wrapped in sentimental language, and Taiwan’s fate must never be entrusted to a neighbor’s supposed “ethnic goodwill.”
Shih Wen-yi is a former deputy director-general of the Centers for Disease Control.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,