The Nantou County Government on Saturday last week convened an environmental impact assessment meeting on plans to build an incinerator in Mingjian Township (名間).
In a particularly hard-to-watch moment, tea farmers knelt in protest alongside petitioners before a row of officials and police officers. The scene showed their feeling of betrayal and the depth of their anxieties over the proposal and the troubling reality that Nantou County has long been governed by the wealthy and powerful. Proper procedure has been reduced to a fig leaf for their vested interests.
The county government described the incinerator as necessary to deal with 250 tonnes of household garbage produced every day, yet the plans showed it would have a capacity of 700 tonnes. What of the extra 450 tonnes? It is simple: more room to process industrial waste for profit.
The county claims to be sorting out its finances, but it is actually pushing through a controversial and polluting treatment plant in Mingjian, where 60 percent of Taiwan’s Oolong tea for hand-shaken bubble tea drinks originates.
The county government proposed Sinmin Village (新民) as the site for the incinerator, but overlooked the dangers of the area’s basin-like terrain, which could potentially trap and accumulate dioxin pollutants. Once heavy metals enter the environment and the tea fields, it would put local tea farmers’ livelihoods and bubble tea food safety standards across the country at risk.
Interestingly, the original report considered Nantou City (南投), and Caotun (草屯), Jhushan (竹山) and Guosing (國姓) townships as sites for the incinerator, one of which was ruled out for being upwind of the Nantou County Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) director’s house.
Ultimately, Mingjian Township, governed by a Democratic Progressive Party mayor, was selected. It is difficult not to view that decision as being politically motivated.
Perhaps most alarming is the lack of ethics behind the EPB’s decision.
The chairman of the Environmental Assessment Committee, National Chi Nan University professor Tsai Yung-pin (蔡勇斌), told the kneeling tea farmers: “You set a terrible example.”
Ivory tower arrogance indeed.
A quick look at the records reveals that Tsai’s team has long worked on Nantou County Government projects, where the relationship between research funding and policy decisionmaking has become deeply intertwined.
As the International Association for Impact Assessment puts it, environmental assessments should put public interests first.
What is happening in Nantou is unfair. EPB, as a player, is buying out the referee.
Why, in a democratic country, do citizens have no recourse other than kneeling? How could power in Nantou, long governed by the DPP, be flaunted so arrogantly? The issue is certainly not confined to the region either.
Once the inevitable “incinerator tea” label takes hold, the decades-long reputation of the purity of Mingjian’s tea would evaporate overnight.
Vested interests contaminating the bubble tea in every other person’s hand in Taiwan should concern all. Nantou County Commissioner Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華) must face the images of the kneeling protestors and ask herself: Is this not the very community she claims to be looking after?
Liou Je-wei is a teacher.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
In a Taiwanese university classroom, a lecturer asks in English: “Can anyone give me an example from Taiwan?” Students look down. No one answers. After class, one student writes on the course platform in Mandarin: “I understood the concept, but I didn’t know how to answer in English.” That moment highlights a key issue in Taiwan’s English-medium instruction (EMI) reform: It is not just about more English-taught courses, but whether students can learn, participate and belong. EMI expansion is part of the Bilingual 2030 policy and the Ministry of Education’s BEST Program, aiming to improve English ability, support EMI teaching
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
The Ministry of the Interior, working with the navy and coast guard, is organizing Taiwan’s first joint exercise simulating escort tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil through a Chinese blockade. The drills simulate fuel transport along three maritime corridors leading toward Japan, the Philippines and the US. Deputy Minister of the Interior Sawyer Mars (馬士元) said that a blockade of the Taiwan Strait would amount to “almost a 100 percent blockade of the regional energy supply.” Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo said planning to counter a blockade is standard practice in Taipei. While the exercise is limited in
RSS