The Nantou County Government on Saturday last week convened an environmental impact assessment meeting on plans to build an incinerator in Mingjian Township (名間).
In a particularly hard-to-watch moment, tea farmers knelt in protest alongside petitioners before a row of officials and police officers. The scene showed their feeling of betrayal and the depth of their anxieties over the proposal and the troubling reality that Nantou County has long been governed by the wealthy and powerful. Proper procedure has been reduced to a fig leaf for their vested interests.
The county government described the incinerator as necessary to deal with 250 tonnes of household garbage produced every day, yet the plans showed it would have a capacity of 700 tonnes. What of the extra 450 tonnes? It is simple: more room to process industrial waste for profit.
The county claims to be sorting out its finances, but it is actually pushing through a controversial and polluting treatment plant in Mingjian, where 60 percent of Taiwan’s Oolong tea for hand-shaken bubble tea drinks originates.
The county government proposed Sinmin Village (新民) as the site for the incinerator, but overlooked the dangers of the area’s basin-like terrain, which could potentially trap and accumulate dioxin pollutants. Once heavy metals enter the environment and the tea fields, it would put local tea farmers’ livelihoods and bubble tea food safety standards across the country at risk.
Interestingly, the original report considered Nantou City (南投), and Caotun (草屯), Jhushan (竹山) and Guosing (國姓) townships as sites for the incinerator, one of which was ruled out for being upwind of the Nantou County Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) director’s house.
Ultimately, Mingjian Township, governed by a Democratic Progressive Party mayor, was selected. It is difficult not to view that decision as being politically motivated.
Perhaps most alarming is the lack of ethics behind the EPB’s decision.
The chairman of the Environmental Assessment Committee, National Chi Nan University professor Tsai Yung-pin (蔡勇斌), told the kneeling tea farmers: “You set a terrible example.”
Ivory tower arrogance indeed.
A quick look at the records reveals that Tsai’s team has long worked on Nantou County Government projects, where the relationship between research funding and policy decisionmaking has become deeply intertwined.
As the International Association for Impact Assessment puts it, environmental assessments should put public interests first.
What is happening in Nantou is unfair. EPB, as a player, is buying out the referee.
Why, in a democratic country, do citizens have no recourse other than kneeling? How could power in Nantou, long governed by the DPP, be flaunted so arrogantly? The issue is certainly not confined to the region either.
Once the inevitable “incinerator tea” label takes hold, the decades-long reputation of the purity of Mingjian’s tea would evaporate overnight.
Vested interests contaminating the bubble tea in every other person’s hand in Taiwan should concern all. Nantou County Commissioner Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華) must face the images of the kneeling protestors and ask herself: Is this not the very community she claims to be looking after?
Liou Je-wei is a teacher.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS