The Nantou County Government on Saturday last week convened an environmental impact assessment meeting on plans to build an incinerator in Mingjian Township (名間).
In a particularly hard-to-watch moment, tea farmers knelt in protest alongside petitioners before a row of officials and police officers. The scene showed their feeling of betrayal and the depth of their anxieties over the proposal and the troubling reality that Nantou County has long been governed by the wealthy and powerful. Proper procedure has been reduced to a fig leaf for their vested interests.
The county government described the incinerator as necessary to deal with 250 tonnes of household garbage produced every day, yet the plans showed it would have a capacity of 700 tonnes. What of the extra 450 tonnes? It is simple: more room to process industrial waste for profit.
The county claims to be sorting out its finances, but it is actually pushing through a controversial and polluting treatment plant in Mingjian, where 60 percent of Taiwan’s Oolong tea for hand-shaken bubble tea drinks originates.
The county government proposed Sinmin Village (新民) as the site for the incinerator, but overlooked the dangers of the area’s basin-like terrain, which could potentially trap and accumulate dioxin pollutants. Once heavy metals enter the environment and the tea fields, it would put local tea farmers’ livelihoods and bubble tea food safety standards across the country at risk.
Interestingly, the original report considered Nantou City (南投), and Caotun (草屯), Jhushan (竹山) and Guosing (國姓) townships as sites for the incinerator, one of which was ruled out for being upwind of the Nantou County Environmental Protection Bureau (EPB) director’s house.
Ultimately, Mingjian Township, governed by a Democratic Progressive Party mayor, was selected. It is difficult not to view that decision as being politically motivated.
Perhaps most alarming is the lack of ethics behind the EPB’s decision.
The chairman of the Environmental Assessment Committee, National Chi Nan University professor Tsai Yung-pin (蔡勇斌), told the kneeling tea farmers: “You set a terrible example.”
Ivory tower arrogance indeed.
A quick look at the records reveals that Tsai’s team has long worked on Nantou County Government projects, where the relationship between research funding and policy decisionmaking has become deeply intertwined.
As the International Association for Impact Assessment puts it, environmental assessments should put public interests first.
What is happening in Nantou is unfair. EPB, as a player, is buying out the referee.
Why, in a democratic country, do citizens have no recourse other than kneeling? How could power in Nantou, long governed by the DPP, be flaunted so arrogantly? The issue is certainly not confined to the region either.
Once the inevitable “incinerator tea” label takes hold, the decades-long reputation of the purity of Mingjian’s tea would evaporate overnight.
Vested interests contaminating the bubble tea in every other person’s hand in Taiwan should concern all. Nantou County Commissioner Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華) must face the images of the kneeling protestors and ask herself: Is this not the very community she claims to be looking after?
Liou Je-wei is a teacher.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
RSS