A CTi News reporter surnamed Lin (林) was on Jan. 17 detained and held incommunicado by the Ciaotou Prosecutors’ Office for allegedly funneling money from China into bribes to entice active-duty and retired military personnel to hand over sensitive information.
The prosecutors’ office said it executed search warrants on Lin, and nine active and retired military personnel, on Jan. 16. They detained Lin and five others incommunicado for alleged contraventions of the National Security Act (國家安全法) and the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例) after questioning.
Lin was searched due to his alleged involvement in an ongoing case against a Marine Corps officer surnamed Chen (陳), who was indicted for allegedly receiving NT$210,000 to film a clip of himself pledging allegiance to China. Prosecutors found that Lin had allegedly transferred money to Chen, and other active and retired military personnel in exchange for military intelligence or classified information to be handed to Chinese contacts, and that Lin’s funding allegedly came from China.
News about Taiwanese — particularly military personnel — indicted on charges of involvement with Chinese infiltration and espionage is no longer rare in Taiwan. A report released last year by the National Security Bureau showed that the number grew from six in 2020 to 64 in 2024, and about 60 percent of the 159 people indicted between 2020 and 2024 were active or retired military personnel.
Lin is a reporter known for relentlessly following and posing tough questions to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) politicians in the Legislative Yuan, and hosting a political commentary show focused on criticizing the party. For someone like Lin to be detained for alleged involvement in Chinese infiltration is fairly rare.
On one side, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) caucus deputy whip Chang Chi-kai (張?楷) immediately called Lin an excellent reporter who scrutinizes the ruling party and said that detaining him is an act of “green terror,” likening the current situation to the White Terror period of authoritarian rule under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime. He also said it was “yet another case” of political restriction of freedom of speech. Some online commentators called detaining a reporter who questions the DPP “political retaliation” and “censorship,” adding that it causes a “chilling effect.”
On the other side, people praised the prosecutors for detaining Lin and other suspected “Chinese collaborators in Taiwan,” while also raising concerns about the depth of Chinese infiltration into Taiwanese society, extending from high-ranking military officers to junior officers, and even into the media.
Unexpectedly, CTi News, a media outlet widely recognized for its pro-Beijing and China-friendly stance, on Jan. 18 issued a statement that the company was unaware of Lin’s alleged involvement in the case and had no comment. The KMT, which has openly supported CTi News and is pushing a bill for CTi News to regain its broadcast license, has also remained silent.
The Ministry of National Defense said it would not comment on the case, as judicial proceedings had already begun.
However, regardless of whether Lin is guilty of the alleged crimes threatening national security, the case has highlighted how China’s “united front” work and cognitive warfare are not as simple as many people believed.
China’s “united front” work against Taiwan is more complex, long-standing and refined — covertly weaving its influence into different walks of life, including the media, which could to some extent shape public opinion. The narratives might not always be positively promoting China, but instead aimed at creating, amplifying and exploiting internal disparities, eroding public trust in democratic institutions, and fostering cynicism or apathy to politics in Taiwan to provide the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its local collaborators with more opportunities to influence major decisions.
Therefore, no matter if the TPP or its supporters truly believe Lin is a victim of political persecution, Chang’s remark deliberately linking Lin’s detention to “freedom of speech” and his reporting style, while omitting that he allegedly engaged in financial transactions with several espionage suspects, is truly irresponsible and playing into the hands of the “united front.”
While it is important to enhance media literacy to deter misinformation, the government and experts should also help update the public’s knowledge on how the CCP’s cognitive warfare and infiltration methods have evolved, and how to prevent them. Moreover, if the court reaches a guilty verdict, the government should follow up by clearly explaining the case to the public to reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings and the legal proceedings being maliciously labeled as “political persecution.”
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS