When I began writing markets columns for Bloomberg Opinion (then called Gadfly) in 2017, my first piece was on Hong Kong’s enigma network, a complex web of companies with cross-shareholdings identified by activist investor David Webb.
Webb, who died last week at the age of 60, was a rare Robin Hood in a region where local tycoons have outsize influence and questionable corporate governance is commonplace.
The billion-dollar question we are left with is who will pick up Webb’s baton, fighting for minority shareholders and exposing shady business dealings? The need for a tenacious watchdog is all the more pressing now that Hong Kong has entered a bull market, giving company insiders cover to pump and dump stocks and subjecting illiquid small-caps to flash crashes.
Not a business insider, Webb relied only on public information to painstakingly map out the money trail. Among his many accomplishments, his biggest was maintaining the Webb-site, which contains free online databases of company shareholdings and board compositions.
Using these tools, in 2017, Webb spotted what he dubbed the enigma network — “50 stocks not to own” because of their intertwined inexplicable investments in each other. The following year, he shed light on China Huarong Asset Management, the state-owned bad-debt manager, and its extensive dealings in Hong Kong, including providing equity-linked loans to shell companies with questionable investments.
When chairman Lai Xiaomin (賴小民) was investigated for corruption and removed from office in late 2018, stocks associated with Huarong tumbled. Webb showed how to invest — or at least avoid land mines.
In hopes that his site would live on without him, Webb said he tried handing it over to the University of Hong Kong along with offers of substantial donations to support it, only to be turned down.
In theory, Webb’s work can continue. With the advent of generative artificial intelligence and coding tools from the likes of Anthropic, even a finance professional not steeped in computer science can write programs to maintain and update databases on Webb-site.
The more tricky part is who wants to perform the public service? Webb was laser-focused on small-cap companies, the ignored corner in Hong Kong’s US$6.5 trillion stock market. Among the entire universe of 2,780 listed firms, only 25 percent have analyst coverage and about two-thirds are micro-caps, or those with a valuation of less than HK$2 billion (US$256.45 million).
Brokerages certainly have no interest, because the stocks do not generate enough trading business. Short sellers are likely to stay away as well, preferring to take on high-profile companies that garner media interest instead. That is because small stocks simply do not offer enough liquidity to make it financially worthwhile.
Granted, Hong Kong’s regulators have gotten better at tackling market irregularities. Starting in 2023, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission required brokers to assign a unique ID to each of their clients, known as a Broker-to-Client Assigned Number (BCAN), and tag the ID to all their securities orders, in an attempt to track and deter market manipulation.
However, there is just so much BCAN can do. In Webb’s view, one reason why Hong Kong is prone to sudden stock plunges is that investors are in the dark about the share pledges made by controlling stakeholders.
Hong Kong’s small-cap space has continued to periodically suffer from sudden and steep price declines long after Webb stepped back from his in-depth research in 2020 following his cancer diagnosis.
For example, on April 9, 2024, China Tianrui Group Cement Co lost almost all of its value after brokers’ margin calls and forced selling of the founders’ shares. Investors only found out when it was too late.
Until the government develops enough political will to confront the influential banking industry and change disclosure rules, there is a continued public need for an updated Webb-site.
For example, using a database that Webb designed to analyze movements of large blocks of shares among banks and brokers, investors can make educated guesses about company insiders’ stock pledges.
Many in the investing community have the ability to do what Webb did, but few have the altruistic intent, which made the banker-turned-corporate-governance champion all the more special. Who will step up and be the next gatekeeper?
Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. A former investment banker, she was a markets reporter for Barron’s. She is a CFA charterholder. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS