China’s attempts to hold its tourists hostage have yet again failed, Japan being a case in point. Taiwan is familiar with this bullying tactic: In hindsight, hysterical outbursts from Beijing helped Taiwan to control the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019.
The region is no stranger to Chinese bans on tourism. In an attempt to punish and sabotage Seoul for allowing Washington to deploy the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile system, China banned group tours to South Korea in 2017. Not only did it fail to push Seoul to succumb, US-South Korea security cooperation has improved under successive administrations in Washington.
Although China remains one of its top three sources of tourists, South Korea has since de-risked, with Chinese tourists at roughly 23 percent of the total, down from 47 percent in 2017.
Taiwan experienced a ban on individual tourists from China in the middle of 2019. That was a ploy to hurt the local economy to punish views that the Chinese Communist Party leadership did not condone.
However, the ban helped then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) better control the COVID-19 pandemic.
Through Taipei’s effective control of the pandemic, the nation won global praise and significantly boosted its soft power through the “Taiwan Can Help” campaign.
China’s ban gave Tsai the mandate to diversify Taiwan’s tourism industry from reliance on Chinese visitors. She aggressively pivoted to welcome others in the region, including Japanese, South Korean and Southeast Asian tourists. Despite a short-term drop in tourism revenue, the figures have rebounded and have been supplemented by tourists from elsewhere.
This is a lesson that Japan has already learned from, as it focuses on tourism from nations other than China. Chinese efforts to coerce the administration of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi into toeing its line have backfired.
What is striking is the positive political effects that the Taiwan and Japan bans have brought. In the case of Japan, not only has Takaichi’s defiance in not kowtowing to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) line following the ban boosted her popularity, it has also given her the perfect ammunition to address and resolve tourism issues that she and her allies campaigned on.
Not only has Takaichi’s public approval rating soared to a record 75 percent weeks after China’s ban, Japan’s partnership with Taiwan has blossomed. Just last week, a delegation of 30 Japanese lawmakers visited Taiwan, including ruling-party heavyweights who previously had been seen taking a friendlier stance toward China, such as former Japanese foreign and defense minister Taro Kono.
If such bullying tactics are aimed at isolating Taiwan, it has only brought the nation closer to its key democratic partners. What is apparent is how limited the effect of tourism bans are and how Chinese aggression is putting the global spotlight on Taiwan.
As Beijing continues to unilaterally disrupt regional peace through its armed forces, including this week’s “Justice Mission 2025” live-fire drills around Taiwan, it will only draw more condemnation from its neighbors, highlight the security risk that it poses, and push its neighbors to edge away from the Chinese economy and its consumers.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at Safe Spaces, a consulting firm based in Taipei and Washington focusing on Taiwan’s politics, media, civil society and key issues influencing Taiwan’s future. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts, and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan, Japan and the US. He can be reached at rathwang@safespacesllc.com.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS