Taiwan has had a tax revenue surplus every year since 2021, with last year’s figure reaching NT$528.3 billion (US$16.8 billion), which brought the cumulative surpluses of the past four years to NT$1.87 trillion, Ministry of Finance data showed.
That was why legislators from the opposition earlier this year demanded that the surpluses be returned to taxpayers. The Legislative Yuan then passed revisions to a special resilience act in August, setting the stage for the NT$10,000 cash handout to all residents, which began last month. However, it might be different this year.
From January to last month, the government collected NT$3.58 trillion in tax revenue, 0.3 percent higher than the same period last year and representing 94.2 percent of its full-year budget.
However, that suggested a shortfall of NT$220.6 billion compared with the government’s target, the ministry said on Dec. 11. Preliminary estimates showed that full-year tax revenue could fail to meet the government’s target by between NT$30 billion and NT$50 billion, the first shortfall in five years, the ministry said, attributing the gap to sluggish car and housing markets, which resulted in substantial decreases in revenues from commodity, deed and land value increment taxes.
The ministry’s remarks raised questions from some people, as the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last month revised its economic growth forecast for this year to 7.37 percent — the highest in 15 years — about why there would be a tax revenue shortfall this year. Is this a sign of the nation’s deteriorating financial health?
It is natural for some people to have such questions, as they mistakenly believe that tax revenue surplus means the government has extra income, but that is not the case. Tax revenue surplus simply means that the tax collected by the government exceeds the amount it projected. It does not automatically mean a healthy treasury. By the same token, a shortfall in tax revenue does not indicate a worsening in the whole financial picture.
Judging from the central government debt ratio, Taiwan’s fiscal situation remains sound.
The central government’s long-term debt — outstanding debt with a maturity of more than one year — was NT$5.84 trillion as of the end of last month, which is equivalent to 24.27 percent of average GDP over the past three years, ministry data showed. It had estimated the government debt-to-GDP ratio this year could hit a 27-year low and fall far below the limit stipulated in the Public Debt Act (公共債務法) of 40.6 percent. Compared with other countries where debt ratios are often two or three times higher, Taiwan’s fiscal situation has continued to improve since 2012, when it posted a peak government debt-to-GDP ratio of about 39.2 percent, not to mention that the nation has hardly any external debt.
What is important for the nation is not the debt ratio, but whether the government’s spending budgets and the tax revenue it collects could drive economic growth and further national development effectively, which in turn would generate more tax revenue and put the government in a better position to repay its debt. Unfortunately, it does not appear that the ruling and opposition parties are on the same page on this issue, but have instead often accused each other of a lack of fiscal discipline in spending plans that run counter to their interest. What warrants the public’s attention is whether weak tax revenues and growing expenditures become the norm, potentially allowing the shortfall to evolve from short-term fluctuations to a long-term structural problem.
On the other hand, this year’s tax revenue shortfall might signal a correction in the structural inaccuracy of the government’s tax revenue forecasting model. In the past, the ministry and the DGBAS tended to adopt a highly conservative estimate when preparing budgets, deliberately lowering the tax revenue target. The result was that actual tax revenue consistently exceeded the expected amount, creating a structural, excess tax revenue trend that continued year after year.
If the discrepancy between estimated and actual revenue is only 1 to 2 percent this year and remains so over the following years, regardless of whether it is a revenue surplus or shortfall, it would mean that it is not a warning sign of worsening public finances or economy, but rather that the government is taking a more realistic approach in preparing budgets and that its fiscal governance is returning to the right track.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS