Taiwan has had a tax revenue surplus every year since 2021, with last year’s figure reaching NT$528.3 billion (US$16.8 billion), which brought the cumulative surpluses of the past four years to NT$1.87 trillion, Ministry of Finance data showed.
That was why legislators from the opposition earlier this year demanded that the surpluses be returned to taxpayers. The Legislative Yuan then passed revisions to a special resilience act in August, setting the stage for the NT$10,000 cash handout to all residents, which began last month. However, it might be different this year.
From January to last month, the government collected NT$3.58 trillion in tax revenue, 0.3 percent higher than the same period last year and representing 94.2 percent of its full-year budget.
However, that suggested a shortfall of NT$220.6 billion compared with the government’s target, the ministry said on Dec. 11. Preliminary estimates showed that full-year tax revenue could fail to meet the government’s target by between NT$30 billion and NT$50 billion, the first shortfall in five years, the ministry said, attributing the gap to sluggish car and housing markets, which resulted in substantial decreases in revenues from commodity, deed and land value increment taxes.
The ministry’s remarks raised questions from some people, as the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last month revised its economic growth forecast for this year to 7.37 percent — the highest in 15 years — about why there would be a tax revenue shortfall this year. Is this a sign of the nation’s deteriorating financial health?
It is natural for some people to have such questions, as they mistakenly believe that tax revenue surplus means the government has extra income, but that is not the case. Tax revenue surplus simply means that the tax collected by the government exceeds the amount it projected. It does not automatically mean a healthy treasury. By the same token, a shortfall in tax revenue does not indicate a worsening in the whole financial picture.
Judging from the central government debt ratio, Taiwan’s fiscal situation remains sound.
The central government’s long-term debt — outstanding debt with a maturity of more than one year — was NT$5.84 trillion as of the end of last month, which is equivalent to 24.27 percent of average GDP over the past three years, ministry data showed. It had estimated the government debt-to-GDP ratio this year could hit a 27-year low and fall far below the limit stipulated in the Public Debt Act (公共債務法) of 40.6 percent. Compared with other countries where debt ratios are often two or three times higher, Taiwan’s fiscal situation has continued to improve since 2012, when it posted a peak government debt-to-GDP ratio of about 39.2 percent, not to mention that the nation has hardly any external debt.
What is important for the nation is not the debt ratio, but whether the government’s spending budgets and the tax revenue it collects could drive economic growth and further national development effectively, which in turn would generate more tax revenue and put the government in a better position to repay its debt. Unfortunately, it does not appear that the ruling and opposition parties are on the same page on this issue, but have instead often accused each other of a lack of fiscal discipline in spending plans that run counter to their interest. What warrants the public’s attention is whether weak tax revenues and growing expenditures become the norm, potentially allowing the shortfall to evolve from short-term fluctuations to a long-term structural problem.
On the other hand, this year’s tax revenue shortfall might signal a correction in the structural inaccuracy of the government’s tax revenue forecasting model. In the past, the ministry and the DGBAS tended to adopt a highly conservative estimate when preparing budgets, deliberately lowering the tax revenue target. The result was that actual tax revenue consistently exceeded the expected amount, creating a structural, excess tax revenue trend that continued year after year.
If the discrepancy between estimated and actual revenue is only 1 to 2 percent this year and remains so over the following years, regardless of whether it is a revenue surplus or shortfall, it would mean that it is not a warning sign of worsening public finances or economy, but rather that the government is taking a more realistic approach in preparing budgets and that its fiscal governance is returning to the right track.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS